Wettability versus roughness of engineering surfaces

Wear

Volumn 271, Issue 3-4, 2011, Pages 523-528

  Kubiak, K J ^a   Wilson, M C T ^a   Mathia, T G ^b   Carval, Ph ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^b LABORATOIRE DE TRIBOLOGIE ET DYNAMIQUE DES SYSTÈMES   (France)

^c ALTIMET SAS 1   (France)

Author keywords

Contact angle; Functional surfaces; Lubrication; Surface roughness; Wetting

Indexed keywords

ALUMINIUM ALLOYS; ANISOTROPIC SURFACES; ENGINEERING MATERIALS; ENGINEERING SURFACES; FUNCTIONAL SURFACES; LIQUID COATINGS; REAL ENGINEERING; REDUCING-FRICTION; ROUGHNESS PROFILE ANALYSIS; STATIC AND DYNAMIC;

ALUMINUM ALLOYS; ANGLE MEASUREMENT; CERIUM ALLOYS; CONTACT ANGLE; INDUSTRIAL APPLICATIONS; LUBRICATION; SURFACE MEASUREMENT; SURFACE PROPERTIES; SURFACES; TITANIUM; TITANIUM ALLOYS; WETTING;

SURFACE ROUGHNESS;

EID: 79957479622     PISSN: 00431648     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2010.03.029     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. de Gennes P.G. Wetting: statics and dynamics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 1985, 57(3):827.
2. Good Robert J. Contact angle, wetting, and adhesion: a critical review. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 1992, 6(12):1269.
3. Narayan Prabhu K., Fernades P., Kumar G. Mater. Des. 2009, 30(2):297-305.
4. Roucoules V., Gaillard F., Mathia T., Lanteri P. Hydrophobic mechanochemical treatment of metallic surfaces. Wettability measurements as means of assessing homogeneity. Adv. Colloids Interface Sci. 2002, 97(1-3):177-201.
5. Borruto A., Crivellone G., Marani F. Influence of surface wettability on friction and wear tests. Wear 1998, 222(1):57-65.
6. Genzer J., Efimenko K. Recent developments in superhydrophobic surfaces and their relevance to marine fouling: a review. Biofouling 2006, 22(5):339-360.
7. Hay K.M., Dragila M.I., Liburdy J. Theoretical model for the wetting of a rough surface. J. Colloids Interface Sci. 2008, 325:472-477.
8. Kubiak K.J., Mathia T.G., Wilson M.C.T. Methodology for metrology of wettability versus roughness of engineering surfaces. Proceedings of 14th Congrès International De Métrologie 2009.
9. Kubiak K.J., Mathia T.G. Influence of roughness on contact interface in fretting under dry and boundary lubricated sliding regimes. Wear 2009, 267:315-321.
10. Wenzel R.N. Ind. Eng. Chem. 1936, 28:988.
11. Cassie A.B.D., Baxter S. Trans. Faraday Soc. 1944, 40:546.
12. Chow T.S. Wetting of rough surfaces. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 1998, 10(27):L445.
13. Whyman G., Bormashenko E., Stein T. The rigorous derivation of Young, Cassie-Baxter and Wenzel equations. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2008, 450:355.
14. Extrand C.W., Kumagai Y. An experimental study of contact angle hysteresis. J. Colloids Interface Sci. 1997, 191:378-383.
15. Stout K.J., Blunt L., Dong W.P., Mainsah E., Luo N., Mathia T., Sullivan P.J., Zahouani H. Development of Methods for Characterisation of Roughness in Three Dimensions 2000, Butt.-Heinem.
16. Schwartz A., Minor F. Simplified thermodynamic approach to capillarity. Coll. Sci. 1959, 14:584.
17. Ponter A., Yekta-Fard M. The influence of environment on the drop size-contact angle relationship. Colloids Polym. Sci. 1985, 263:673-681.