Forensic science-A true science?

Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences

Volumn 43, Issue 2-3, 2011, Pages 157-176

  Crispino, Frank ^a   Ribaux, Olivier ^b   Houck, Max ^c   Margot, Pierre ^a  

^a Gendarmerie Criminal Investigation Department   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LAUSANNE   (Switzerland)

^c WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

epistemology; forensics; philosophy; principle; recognition; science

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EPISTEMOLOGY; FORENSIC SCIENCE; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PHILOSOPHY;

EID: 79957453369     PISSN: 00450618     EISSN: 1834562X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00450618.2011.555416     Document Type: Article

References (156)

1. Kirk PL. The ontogeny of criminalistics. J Crim Law, Crim Police Sci. 1963;54:235-238.
2. Saks MJ. Implications of the Daubert test for forensic identification science. Shepard's Exp Sci Evid Quart. 1994;1(3):427-434.
3. Saks MJ, Faigman DL. Failed forensics: how forensic science lost its way and how it might yet find it. Ann Rev Law Soc Sci. 2008;4:149-171.
4. Evett IW. Expert evidence and forensic misconceptions of the nature of exact science. Sci Justice. 1996;36(2):118-122. (Pubitemid 26160009)
5. Cole SA. Forensics without uniqueness, conclusions without individualization: the new epistemology of forensic identification. Law Prob Risk. 2009;8:233-255.
6. Inman K, Rudin N. Principles and practice of criminalistics-the profession of forensic science. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2001.
7. Popper KR. La logique de la decouverte scientifique. Paris: Bibliotheque scientifique Payot, 1973.
8. Kaye DH. On 'Falsification' and 'Falsifiability': the first DaubertFactor and the philosophy of science. Jurimetrics J. 2005;45:473-481.
9. Cole SA. Where the rubber meets the road: thinking about expert evidence as expert testimony. Villanova Law Rev. 2007;52(4). 2007.
10. Sagan C. Demon haunted world. New York: Random House, 1997. p. 223.
11. Millen P. Is crime scene investigation forensic science? Are crime scene investigators forensic scientists? Sci Justice. 2000;40(2):125-126.
12. Caddy B. Educating and training the forensic practitioner for the new millennium. Sci Justice. 2000;40(2):143-146.
13. Harrison K. Is crime scene examination science, and does it matter anyway? Sci Justice. 2006;46(2):65-68. (Pubitemid 44412460)
14. Crispino F. Nature and place of crime scene management within forensic sciences. Sci Justice. 2008;48(1):24-28. (Pubitemid 351766711)
15. Gross H. Handbuch fur Untersuchungsrichter als System der Kriminalistik. Graz, 1893.
16. Gialamas DM. Criminalistics in the forensic sciences. In: Siegel JA, Saukko PJ, Knupfer GC, editors. Encyclopedia of forensic sciences. Academic Press, London, UK & San Diego, USA, 2000. 471-477.
17. Mathyer J. Photographie et police. Revue internationale de criminologie et de police technique RICPT. 1986;2:223-252.
18. Tuthill H. Individualization: principles and procedures in criminalistics. Lightning Powder, Salem, Oregon, USA, 1994.
19. Locard E. L'enquete criminelle et les methodes scientifiques. Paris: Flammarion, 1920.
20. Locard E. La police et les methodes scientifiques. Paris: Editions Ridier, Bibliotheque generale illustree, 1934.
21. National Academy of Science. Committee on Identifying the Needs of the Forensic Sciences Community. Strengthening forensic science in the United States: a path forward. National Research Council, 2009. ISBN: 0-309-13131-6.
22. Siegel JA, Saukko PJ, Knupfer GC. editors. Encyclopedia of forensic sciences, Volume one. London: Academic Press, 2000. Glossary; p. xiii.
23. Ribaux O, Margot P. La trace materielle, vecteur d'information au service du renseignement. Traite de securite interieure. Lausanne: Presses polytechniques et Universitaires Romandes, sous la direction de Maurice Cusson, 2007. 300-321.
24. Crispino F. L'interpretation des donnees de la scene de crime: une simple requete judiciaire? Revue internationale de criminologie et de police technique et scientifique RICPTS. 2009;1(9):105-118.
25. Houck MM, Crispino F Locard's exchange..principle? Theory? Law? An exploration of forensic science's foundational principle. Paper presented on 8 October 2008, at the 19th Australian New Zealand Forensic Science Society Symposium in Melbourne6-9 October.
26. Locard E. Policiers de roman et policiers de laboratoire. Paris: Payot, 1924.
27. Poincare H. La science et l'hypothese. Paris: Flammarion, 1902. edn. 1991.
28. Reiss RA. Manuel de police scientifique (technique). I-Vols et homicides. Paris: Payot, 1911.
29. Whewell W. Remarks on mathematical reasoning and on the logic of induction. In: Butts RE, editors. Theory of scientific method. Indianapolis, USA: Hackett Publishing; 1989. 1837.
30. Locard E. The analysis of dust traces. Am J Police Sci. 1930;1:276-297.
31. Burns DC. When used in the criminal legal process forensic science shows a bias in favour of the prosecution discussion. Sci Justice. 2001;41(4):271.
32. Kind SS, Overman M. Science against crime. London: Aldus Books, 1972.
33. Kirk PL. Crime investigation: physical evidence and the police laboratory. New York: Interscience, 1953.
34. Goddefroy E. Manuel de police technique. Bruxelles: Lancier, 1931.
35. Svensson A, Wendel O, Fisher B. Techniques of crime scene investigation. New York: Elsevier, 1987. 4th edn.
36. Freckelton Selby, editors. Expert evidence. Sydney, Australia: The Law Book Company, 1999. 8-7351.
37. Stoney DA. Transfer Evidence. In: the use of statistics in forensic science. Chichester, UK: Ellis Horwood, 1991. 107-138.
38. Nickolls LC. The scientific investigation of crime. Belfast: Butterworth, 1956. p. 39.
39. Knupfer GC. Crime-scene sciences. In: Encyclopedia of forensic sciences. New York: Academic Press, 2000. Vol. 3. p. 1048.
40. Nordby JJ. Dead reckoning. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2000. p. 22, 189.
41. Wickenheiser RA. Trace DNA: a review, discussion of theory, and application of the transfer of trace quantities of DNA through skin contact. J Forensic Sci. 2002;47(3): 442-450. (Pubitemid 34552985)
42. Klasen L. Photography and digital imaging/overview. In: Encyclopedia of forensic sciences. New York: Academic Press, 2000. Vol. 3. p. 1254.
43. Melchior P. In: Doutremepuich C, editor. La scene de crime de A a Z. Du prelevement a l'identification. Paris: IHESI, 2000.
44. Poincare H. La valeur de la science. Paris: Flammarion, 1905.
45. Hume D. Enquete sur l'entendement humain. Paris: GF Flammarion, 1758. 1983.
46. Kwan QY. Inference of identity of source. Dissertation. CA, USA. Thesis for the Doctorate in Criminology, Berkeley University, 1976.
47. Thornton JI. The snowflake paradigm. J Forensic Sci. 1986;31(2): 399-401.
48. Saks MJ, Koehler JJ. The individualization fallacy in forensic science evidence. Vanderbilt Law Rev. 2008;61(1):199-219.
49. Kaye DH. Probability, individualization and uniqueness in forensic science evidence: listening to the academies. Brooklyn Law Rev. Forthcoming, available from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract-id%14;1261970 [accessed 10 January 2009].
50. Kirk PL. Crime investigation. New York: Wiley, 1974. 2nd edn. p. 9-10.
51. Wittgenstein LW. Tractacus logico-philosophicus. Tel 311. Paris: Gallimard, 1922. 1993. p. 88.
52. Popper KR. Conjectures et refutations-La croissance du savoir scientifique. Paris: Payot, 1985.
53. Thornton J. Ensembles of class characteristics in physical evidence examination. J Forensic Sci. 1986;31(2):501-503. (Pubitemid 16016369)
54. Houck MM. Playing fast and loose with time and space: statistics and forensic science. Presented at the Joint Statistical Meetings. Seattle, WA: American Statistical Association, 2006
55. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharm. Inc., 509 U.S. 579. (1993).
56. Aitken CGG, Stoney DA. The use of statistics in forensic science. Chichester, UK: Ellis Horwood; 1991.
57. Robertson B, Vignaux BA. Interpreting evidence. Evaluating forensic science in the courtroom. New York: Wiley, 1995.
58. Aitken CGG, Taroni F. Statistics and the evaluation of evidence for forensic scientists. New York: Wiley, 2004. 2nd edn.
59. Lucy D. Introduction to statistics for forensic scientists. Chichester, UK: Wiley; 2005.
60. Evett IW. Criminalistics: the future of expertise. Sci Justice. 1993;33(3):173-178. (Pubitemid 23299712)
61. Rosenkrantz RD. Inference, method and decision: towards a Bayesian philosophy of science. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1977.
62. Horwich P. Probability and evidence. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press, 1982.
63. Howson C, Urbach P. Scientific reasoning: the Bayesian approach. La Salle, IL: Open Court; 1989.
64. Earman J. Bayes or bust. A critical examination of Bayesian confirmation theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1992.
65. Weiss C. Expressing scientific uncertainty. Law Prob Risk. 2003;2:25-46.
66. Taroni F, Aitken CGG, Garbolino P, Biedermann A. Bayesian networks and probabilistic inference in forensic science. Wiley, 2006. ISBN 0-470-09173-8.
67. Curran JM, Triggs CM, Buckleton JS, Walsh KAJ, Hicks T. Assessing transfer probabilities in a Bayesian interpretation of forensic glass evidence. Sci Justice. 1998;38(1):15-21. (Pubitemid 28045521)
68. Grieve MC. Back to the future-40 years of fibre examinations in forensic science. Sci Justice. 2000;40(2):93-99.
69. Biedermann A, Bozza S, Taroni F. Probabilistic evidential assessment of gunshot residue particle evidence (Part I): likelihood ratio calculation and case pre-assessment using Bayesian networks. Forensic Sci Int. 2009;191(1-3):24-35.
70. Carter JF, Sleeman R, Parry J. The distribution of controlled drugs on banknotes via counting machines. Forensic Sci Int. 2003;132:106-112. (Pubitemid 36438697)
71. McDermott SD, Willis SM. A survey of the evidential value of paint transfer evidence. J Forensic Sci. 1997;42(6):1012-1018. (Pubitemid 27495819)
72. Lowe A, Murray C, Whitaker J, Tully G, Gill P. The propensity of individuals to deposit DNA and secondary transfer of low level DNA from individuals to inert surfaces. Forensic Sci Int. 2002;129(1):25-34. (Pubitemid 35291880)
73. Wickenheiser RA. Trace DNA: a review, discussion of theory, and application of the transfer of trace quantities of DNA through skin contact. J Forensic Sci. 2002;47(3): 442-450. (Pubitemid 34552985)
74. Phipps M, Petricevic S. The tendency of individuals to transfer DNA to handled items. Forensic Sci Int. 2007;168(2-3):162-168. (Pubitemid 46617847)
75. Pounds CA, Smalldon KW. The transfer of fibres between clothing materials during simulated contacts and their persistence during wear. Part I-fibre transference. J Forensic Sci Soc. 1975;15:17-28.
76. Pounds CA, Smalldon KW. The transfer of fibres between clothing materials during simulated contacts and their persistence during wear. Part II-fibre persistence. J Forensic Sci Soc. 1975;15:29-38.
77. Pounds CA, Smalldon KW. The transfer of fibres between clothing materials during simulated contacts and their persistence during wear. Part III-a preliminary investigation of the mechanisms involved. J Forensic Sci Soc. 1975;15:197-207.
78. Robertson J, Kidd BM, Parkinson HMP. The persistence of textile fibres transferred during simulated contacts. J Forensic Sci Soc. 1982;22:353-360. (Pubitemid 13207389)
79. Cook R, Evett IW, Jackson G, Rogers M. A workshop approach to improving the understanding of the significance of fibres evidence. Sci Justice. 1993;33(3):149-152. (Pubitemid 23299707)
80. Roux C, Margot P. L'estimation de la valeur indiciale des fibres textiles decouvertes en relation avec une affaire criminelle-utopie ou realite? Revue internationale de police technique et scientifique. 1994;2:229-241.
81. Roux C, Langdon S, Waight D, Robertson J. The transfer and persistence of automotive carpet fibres on shoe soles. Sci Justice. 1999;39(4):239-251. (Pubitemid 29484154)
82. Grieve MC, Biermann TW. Wool fibres-transfer to vinyl and leather vehicle seats and some observations on their secondary transfer. Sci Justice. 1997;37(1):31-38. (Pubitemid 27050951)
83. Grieve MC. Back to the future-40 years of fibre examinations in forensic science. Sci. Justice. 2000;40(2):93-99.
84. Hoke F. Science in the courtroom: what evidence is admissible-and who decides? Scientist. 1994;8(12):4-5.
85. Saks MJ. Merlin and Solomon: lessons from the law's formative encounters with forensic identification science. Hastings Law J. 1998;49:1069-1141.
86. Faigman DL. The law's scientific revolution: reflections and ruminations on the law's use of experts in year 7 of the revolution. 57. Walsh & Lee L. Rev. 57; 2000. p. 662.
87. Denbeaux MP, Risinger DM. Kumho tire and expert reliability: how the question you ask gives the answer you get. Seton Hall Law Rev. 2003;34(15):15-75.
88. Risinger DM, Saks MJ. A house with no foundation. Iss Sci Technol. 2003;20(1): 35-39.
89. Moriarty JC, Saks MJ. Forensic science: grand goals, tragic flaws, and judicial gatekeeping. University of Akron Legal Studies Research Paper No. 06-19; 2006.
90. Schwartz A. A systemic challenge to the reliability and admissibility of firearms and toolmark identification. Sci Technol Law Rev. 2005;VI:1-42.
91. Cook R, Evett IW, Jackson G, Jones PJ, Lambert JA. A model for case assessment, interpretation. Sci Justice. 1998;38(3):151-156.
92. Cook R, Evett IW, Jackson G, Jones PJ, Lambert JA. A hierarchy of propositions: deciding which level to address in casework. Sci Justice. 1998;38(4):231-239. (Pubitemid 28499800)
93. Evett IW, Jackson G, Lambert JA. More on the hierarchy of propositions: exploring the distinction between explanations and propositions. Sci Justice. 2000;40(1):3-10. (Pubitemid 30195411)
94. Commission Appell, Darboux, Poincare, 1904. 2eme revision du proces Dreyfus. Paris: Rapport du 20 aout, 1904.
95. Taroni F, Champod C, Margot P. Forerunners of Bayesianism in early forensic science. Jurimetrics J. 1998;38:183-200.
96. Russell B. An essay on the foundations of geometry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1897. London: Routledge; 1996.
97. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/science [accessed 10 Jan 2010].
98. Henry J. Magic and science in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. In: Olby RC, Cantor GN, Christie JRR, Hodge MJS, editors. Companion to the history of modern science. London, UK: Routledge; 1996.583-596.
99. Chalmers AF. What is this thing called Science? Buckingham, UK: Open University Press; 1999. p. 1.
100. Rousseau P. Histoire de la science, Les grandes etudes historiques. Fayard: Librairie Artheme Fayard, 1945.
101. Molland AG. Aristotelian science. In: Olby RC, Cantor GN, Christie JRR, Hodge MJS, editors. Companion to the history of modern science. London: Routledge, 1996. 557-567.
102. Ravetz JR. The Copernican revolution. In: Olby RC, Cantor GN, Christie JRR, Hodge MJS, editors. Companion to the history of modern science. London: Routledge, 1996. 201-216.
103. Bacon F. The new Organon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1620, 2000.
104. Turner JRG. The history of science and the working scientist. In: Olby RC, Cantor GN, Christie JRR, Hodge MJS, editors. Companion to the history of modern science. London: Routledge, 1996. 23-31.
105. McMullin E. The development of philosophy of science, 1600-1900. In: Olby RC, Cantor GN, Christie JRR, Hodge MJS, editors. Companion to the history of modern science. London, UK: Routledge; 1996. 816-827.
106. Gabbey A. Newton and natural philosophy. In: Olby RC, Cantor GN, Christie JRR, Hodge MJS, editors. Companion to the history of modern science. London: Routledge, 1996. 243-262.
107. Schuster JA. The scientific revolution. In: Olby RC, Cantor GN, Christie JRR, Hodge MJS, editors. Companion to the history of modern science. London: Routledge, 1996. 217-242.
108. Salmon WC. The foundations of scientific inference. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press; 1967.
109. Kant E. Critique de la raison pure. Paris: GF Flammarion, 1781. 2001.
110. Reichenbach H. The rise of scientific philosophy. California: University of California Press, 1951.
111. Carnap R. An Introduction to the philosophy of science. New York: Dover Publications, 1966.
112. Russell B. Histoire de mes idees philosophiques. Paris: Gallimard, 1961. 2001.
113. Verdan A. Karl Popper ou la connaissance sans certitude. Lausanne: Presses Polytechniques et Universitaires Romandes, 1991.
114. Popper KR. La connaissance objective. Paris: Champs-Flammarion, 1991.
115. Duhem P. La theorie physique: son objet, sa structure. Vrin: Bibliotheque des textes philosophiques, 2007. 1906.
116. Quine WV. Two dogmas of empiricism. In: From a logical point of view: nine logico-philosophical essays. Harvard: Harvard University Press, 1980, 1951. 20-46.
117. Feyerabend P. Against method. London: Verso, 2000.
118. Feyerabend P. Farewell to reason. London: Verso, 2000.
119. Hodge MJS, Cantor GN. The development of philosophy of science since 1900. In: Olby RC, Cantor GN, Christie JRR, Hodge MJS, editors. Companion to the history of modern science. London UK: Routledge; 1996. 838-852.
120. Lakatos I, Musgrave A, editors. Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1999.
121. Bachelard G. La formation de l'esprit scientifique. Contribution a une analyse de la connaissance objective. Vrin. Paris: Librairie philosophique, 1938. 1960.
122. Gutting G. Continental philosophy and the history of science. In: Olby RC, Cantor GN, Christie JRR, Hodge MJS, editors. Companion to the history of modern science. London: Routledge, 1996. 127-147.
123. Pinch T. The sociology of the scientific community. In: Olby RC, Cantor GN, Christie JRR, Hodge MJS, editors. Companion to the history of modern science. London: Routledge, 1996. 87-99.
124. Polanyi M. Science, faith and society. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press; 1946.
125. Kuhn TS. La structure des revolutions scientifiques. Paris: Champs-Flammarion, 1970. Translated from the French.
126. Porter R. The history of science and the history of society. In: Olby RC, Cantor GN, Christie JRR, Hodge MJS, editors. Companion to the history of modern science. London, Routledge; 1996. 32-46.
127. Masterman M. The nature of a paradigm. In: Lakatos I, Musgrave A, editors. Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
128. Kuhn TS. The essential tension. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago; 1977.
129. Watkins J. Against 'normal science'. In: Lakatos I, Musgrave A, editors. Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press; 1999. p. 27.
130. Barnes B. Sociological theories of scientific knowledge. In: Olby RC, Cantor GN, Christie JRR, Hodge MJS, editors. Companion to the history of modern science. London: Routledge, 1996. 60-76.
131. Lakatos I. Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. UK: Cambridge University Press, 1968.
132. Motterlini M. editor. For and against method. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, 1999.
133. Kuhn TS. Logic of discovery or psychology of research. In: Lakatos I, Musgrave A, editors. Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press; 1999.
134. Habermas J. La technique et la science comme 'ideologie'. Paris: TEL Gallimard, 1973.
135. Giere RN. Explaining science: a cognitive approach (science and its conceptual foundations). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1990.
136. Cartwright N. How the laws of physics lie. New York: Oxford University Press, 1983.
137. Ackerman RJ. Data, instruments, and theory: a dialectical approach to understanding science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1985.
138. Franklin A. Experiment, right or wrong. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
139. Galison PL. How experiments end. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1992.
140. Mayo D. Error and the growth of experimental knowledge. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press; 1996.
141. Hacking GI. Representing and intervening. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press; 1983.
142. Esfeld M. Cours d'epistemologie des sciences, chapitre 4. Theorie et observation. Universite de Lausanne, ete, 2003.
143. Peirce CS. La philosophie et la conduite de la vie. In: Le raisonnement et la logique des choses. Paris: Editions du Cerf, 19951898.151-171.
144. Ginzburg C. Clues: Morelli, Freud, Sherlock Holmes. In: Eco U, Sebeok TA, editors. Dupin, Holmes, Peirce, the sign of three. Indiana: Indiana University Press, First Midland Book Edition, 1988. 81-118.
145. Earman J. Bayes or bust. A critical examination of Bayesian confirmation theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1992.
146. De Finetti B. Probability: beware of falsifications!. In: Kyburg JrHE, Smokler HE, editors. Studies in subjective probability. Huntington, NewYork: Robert E. Krieger; 1980, 1977. p. 199.
147. Briskman L. Rationality, science and history. In: Olby RC, Cantor GN, Christie JRR, Hodge MJS, editors. Companion to the history of modern science. London: Routledge, 1996. p. 171.
148. Fisher RA. On the 'probable error' of a coefficient of correlation deduced from a small sample. Metron. 1921. 3-32.
149. Fisher RA. Statistical methods for research workers. New York: Oxford University Press, 1990. 1925.
150. Nerlove M. The likelihood principle. 1999. Chapter 1. www.arec.umd.edu [accessed 15 Aug 2003].
151. Zeipen B. Les exigences professionnelles des laboratoires de police technique et scientifique de la police federale. Police technique et scientifique, les exigences d'une preuve fiable. Bruxelles: CEP, Politeia, 2005. 41-56.
152. Gallagher J. Crime scene examination. The weakest link-the human element. J Forensic Sci. Service, 1992.
153. Sebeok TA, Umiker-Sebeok J. 'You know my method': a juxtaposition of Charles S. Pierce and Sherlock Holmes. In: Eco U, Sebeok TA, editors. Dupin, Holmes, Peirce, the sign of three. Indiana: Indiana University Press, First Midland Book Edition, 1988. 11-54; p. 22.
154. Hubert PW. Galileo's revenge-junk science in the courtroom. BasicBooks, New York, USA, 1991.
155. Mauskopf SH. Marginal science. In: Olby RC, Cantor GN, Christie JRR, Hodge MJS, editors. Companion to the history of modern science. London: Routledge, 1996. 869-885.
156. Cole SA. Toward evidence-based evidence: supporting forensic knowledge claims in the post-Daubert era. Tulsa Law Rev. 2007;43(2):101-121.