A statewide analysis of bicycling in New Jersey

International Journal of Sustainable Transportation

Volumn 5, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 251-269

  Noland, Robert B ^a   Deka, Devajyoti ^a   Walia, Ranjit ^a  

^a The State University of New Jersey   (United States)

Author keywords

Bicycle use survey; Binary logit; Leisure and recreation; Ordered probit; Physical activity; Travel behavior

Indexed keywords

BINARY LOGIT; LEISURE AND RECREATION; ORDERED PROBIT; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; TRAVEL BEHAVIOR;

MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PARKS; POPULATION STATISTICS; SURVEYS;

BICYCLES;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; NUMERICAL MODEL; RECREATIONAL ACTIVITY; RECREATIONAL FACILITY; TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE; TRANSPORTATION MODE; TRAVEL BEHAVIOR;

NEW JERSEY; UNITED STATES;

EID: 79957443229     PISSN: 15568318     EISSN: 15568334     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15568318.2010.501482     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Anable J, Gatersleben B. 2005. All work and no play? The role of instrumental and affective factors in work and leisure journeys by different travel modes. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 39(2-3):163-181.
2. Cervero R, Duncan M. 2003. Walking, bicycling, and urban landscapes: Evidence from the San Francisco Bay Area. American Journal of Public Health 93(9):1478-1483.
3. Dickinson JE, Kingham S, Copsey S, Hougie DJP. 2003. Employer travel plans, cycling and gender: Will travel plan measures improve the outlook for cycling to work in the UK? Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 8(1):53-67.
4. Dill J. 2009. Bicycling for transportation and health: The role of infrastructure. Journal of Public Health Policy S95-S110.
5. Dill J, Carr T. 2003. Bicycle commuting and facilities in major U.S. cities: If you build them, commuters will use them. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1828:116-123.
6. Dill J, Voros K. 2007. Factors affecting bicycling demand: Initial survey findings from the Portland, Oregon, region. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2031:9-17.
7. Douma F, Cleaveland F. 2008. The impact of bicycling facilities on commute mode share. Report No. MN=RC 2008-33 edn, Minnesota Department of Transportation, St. Paul, Minnesota.
8. Frank LD, Engelke PO. 2001. The built environment and human activity patterns: Exploring the impacts of urban form on public health. Journal of Planning Literature 16(2):202.
9. Garrard J, Rose G, Lo SK. 2008. Promoting transportation cycling for women: The role of bicycle infrastructure. Preventive Medicine 46(1):55-59.
10. Gatersleben B, Haddad H. 2010. Who is the typical bicyclist? Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 13(1):41-48.
11. Heinen E, Van Wee B, Maat K. 2010. Commuting by bicycle: An overview of the literature. Transport Reviews 30(1):59-96.
12. Hopkinson M. 1996. Evaluating the demand for new cycle facilities. Transport Policy 3(4):241-249.
13. Hunt JD, Abraham JE. 2007. Influences on bicycle use. Transportation 34(4):453-470.
14. Krizek KJ. 2005. Estimating the economic benefits of bicycling and bicycle facilities: An interpretive review and proposed methods. In: P. Coto-Millán, Inglada V (eds.). London: Springer, pp. 219-248.
15. Krizek KJ, Handy SL, Forsyth A. 2009. Explaining changes in walking and bicycling behavior: Challenges for transportation research. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 36(4):725-740.
16. Krizek KJ, Johnson PJ. 2006. Proximity to trails and retail: Effects on urban cycling and walking. Journal of the American Planning Association 72(1):33-42.
17. Moudon AV, Lee C, Cheadle AD, Collier CW, Johnson D, Schmid TL, Weather RD. 2005. Cycling and the built environment, a U.S. perspective. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 10(3):245-261.
18. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. 2008. National survey of bicyclist and pedestrian attitudes and behavior: Volume 1 - Summary report, final report, The Gallup Organization, Washington, DC.
19. Noland RB, Kunreuther H. 1995. Short-run and long-run policies for increasing bicycle transportation for daily commuter trips. Transport Policy 2(1):67-79.
20. North Jersey Transportation Planning Authority 2007. Regional Transportation Needs. Newark, NJ.
21. Pikora T, Giles-Corti B, Bull F, Jamrozik K, Donovan R. 2003. Developing a framework for assessment of the environmental determinants of walking and cycling. Social Science & Medicine 56(8):1693-1703.
22. Pucher J, Buehler R. 2008. Cycling for everyone: Lessons from Europe. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2074:58-65.
23. Pucher J, Dill J, Handy SL. 2010. Infrastructure, programs, and policies to increase bicycling: An international review. Preventive Medicine 50(S1):S106-S125.
24. Stinson MA, Bhat CR. 2004. Frequency of bicycle commuting: Internet-based survey analysis. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1878(1):122-130.
25. U.S. Census Bureau. 2004. 2000 Census of population and housing: Population and housing unit counts. PHC-3-1, United States Summary, Washington, DC.
26. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 1996. Physical activity and health: A report of the Surgeon General, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
27. Xing Y, Handy SL, Mokhtarian PL. 2009. Factors associated with proportions and miles of bicycling for transportation and recreation in six small U.S. cities. Transportation Research Part D 15(2):73-81.