Property specifications for workflow modelling

Science of Computer Programming

Volumn 76, Issue 10, 2011, Pages 942-967

  Wong, Peter Y H ^a   Gibbons, Jeremy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Compatibility; CSP; Linear temporal logic; Property specification patterns; Workflow specification; Workflow verification

Indexed keywords

COMPATIBILITY; CSP; LINEAR TEMPORAL LOGIC; PROPERTY SPECIFICATION PATTERNS; WORKFLOW SPECIFICATION; WORKFLOW VERIFICATION;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; SEMANTICS; SPECIFICATION LANGUAGES; SPECIFICATIONS; TRANSLATION (LANGUAGES);

TEMPORAL LOGIC;

EID: 79956369890     PISSN: 01676423     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.scico.2010.09.007     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Unified modelling language: superstructure, Technical report, Object Management Group, 2004. Available at www.omg.org.
2. F. Arbab Reo: a channel-based coordination model for component composition Mathematical Structures in Computer Science 14 03 2004
3. F. Arbab, N. Kokash, and M. Sun Towards using reo for compliance-aware business process modelling Proceedings of the International Symposium on Leveraging Applications of Formal Methods, Verification and Validation CCIS vol. 17 2008 Springer
4. Business Process Execution Language for Web Services, Version 1.1., May 2003. http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/library/ws-bpel.
5. Mario Bravetti, Gianluigi Zavattaro, Towards a unifying theory for choreography conformance and contract compliance, in: Proc. of 6th International Symposium on Software Composition, SC'07, 2007.
6. R.M. Dijkman, M. Dumas, and C. Ouyang Semantics and analysis of business process models in BPMN Information and Software Technology 2008
7. Matthew B. Dwyer, George S. Avrunin, James C. Corbett, Patterns in property specifications for finite-state verification, in: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Software Engineering, 1999.
8. Formal Systems (Europe) Ltd., Failures-Divergences Refinement, FDR2 User Manual, 1998. www.fsel.com.
9. H. Foster, S. Uchitel, J. Magee, J. Kramer, Model-based analysis of obligations in web service choreography, in: IEEE International Conference on Internet and Web Applications and Services, 2006.
10. Howard Foster, Sebastian Uchitel, Jeff Magee, Jeff Kramer, Compatibility verification for web service choreography, in: IEEE International Conference on Web Services, 2004.
11. A. Hinton, M. Kwiatkowska, G. Norman, and D. Parker Prism: a tool for automatic verification of probabilistic systems Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems LNCS vol. 3920 2006
12. Dexter Kozen Results on the propositional mu-calculus Theoretical Computer Science 27 3 1983
13. A. Lapadula, R. Pugliese, and F. Tiezzi Calculus for orchestration of web services Programming Languages and Systems LNCS vol. 4421 2007
14. Michael Leuschel, Thierry Massart, Andrew Currie, How to make FDR Spin LTL model checking of CSP by refinement, in: FME, 2001, pp. 99118. (Pubitemid 36332795)
15. LOTOSA formal description technique based on the temporal ordering of observational behaviour, Technical Report Technical Report 8807, International Standards Organisation, 1989.
16. Gavin Lowe Specification of communicating processes: temporal logic versus refusals-based refinement Formal Aspects of Computing 20 3 2008
17. J. Magee, and J. Kramer ConcurrencyState Models and Java Programs 1999 John Wiley
18. Zohar Manna, and Amir Pnueli The Temporal Logic of Reactive and Concurrent Systems 1992 Springer-Verlag
19. Mario Bravetti, Gianluigi Zavattaro, A theory for strong service compliance, in: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Coordination Models and Languages, 2007.
20. Message Sequence Charts, Technical Report Recommendation Z.120, International Telecommunications Union, 1996.
21. Abida Mukarram, A refusal testing model for CSP, D. Phil thesis, University of Oxford, 1992.
22. Object Management Group. Business Process Modeling Notation (BPMN) Specification, February 2006. www.bpmn.org.
23. Daniel Plagge, and Michael Leuschel Seven at one stroke: LTL model checking for high-level specifications in B, Z, CSP, and more STTT 12 1 2010 9 21
24. D. Prandi, P. Quaglia, and N. Zannone Formal analysis of bpmn via a translation into cows Coordination Models and Languages LNCS vol. 5052 2008
25. J.N. Reed, J.E. Sinclair, and A.W. Roscoe Responsiveness of interoperating components Formal Aspects of Computing 16 4 2004 394 411
26. A.W. Roscoe The Theory and Practice of Concurrency 1998 Prentice-Hall
27. G. Salan, and T. Bultan Realizability of choreographies using process algebra encodings Proceedings of 7th International Conference on Integrated Formal Methods LNCS vol. 5423 2009
28. Spec patterns. http://patterns.projects.cis.ksu.edu/.
29. Jun Sun, Yang Liu, Jin Song Dong, and Jing Sun Bounded model checking of compositional processes Proceedings of the Second IEEE International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Software Engineering 2008 IEEE 23 30
30. W3C. Web service choreography interface (WSCI) 1.0, November 2002. www.w3.org/TR/wsci.
31. Peter.Y. H. Wong, Model checking BPMN. http://www.comlab.ox.ac.uk/peter. wong/bpmn/.
32. Peter Y.H. Wong, Formalisations and application of business process modelling notation, D. Phil thesis, University of Oxford, 2010. Draft available at http://www.comlab.ox.ac.uk/peter.wong/pub/thesis.pdf.
33. Peter Y.H. Wong, and Jeremy Gibbons A process semantics for BPMN Proceedings of 10th International Conference on Formal Engineering Methods LNCS vol. 5256 2008 Extended version available at http://www.comlab.ox.ac.uk/peter. wong/pub/bpmnsem.pdf
34. Peter Y.H. Wong, and Jeremy Gibbons A relative-timed semantics for BPMN Proceedings of 7th International Workshop on the Foundations of Coordination Languages and Software Architectures 2008 ENTCS Available at http://www.comlab.ox.ac.uk/peter.wong/pub/foclasa08.pdf
35. Peter Y.H. Wong, and Jeremy Gibbons Verifying business process compatibility Proceedings of 8th International Conference on Quality Software 2008 IEEE Computer Society 126 131