Growth and photosynthetic characteristics of blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum cv. Bluecrop) under various shade levels

Scientia Horticulturae

Volumn 129, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 486-492

  Kim, Su Jin ^a   Yu, Duk Jun ^a   Kim, Tae Choon ^b   Lee, Hee Jae ^a  

^a Seoul National University   (South Korea)

^b Wonkwang University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Blueberry; Chlorophyll fluorescence; Photosynthesis; Shade; Stoma

Indexed keywords

ACCLIMATION; CHLOROPHYLL; DICOTYLEDON; ELECTRON; FRUIT; GROWTH RATE; PHOTOCHEMISTRY; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; PHOTOSYNTHETICALLY ACTIVE RADIATION; SHADE TOLERANCE; SHOOT GROWTH; STOMATAL CONDUCTANCE;

VACCINIUM; VACCINIUM CORYMBOSUM;

EID: 79956355818     PISSN: 03044238     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2011.04.022     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Bertamini M., Nedunchezhian N. Photoinhibition and recovery of photosystem II in grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) leaves grown under field conditions. Photosynthetica 2004, 41:611-617.
2. Beyschlag W., Eckstein J. Towards a causal analysis of stomatal patchiness: the role of stomatal size variability and hydrological heterogeneity. Acta Oecol. 2001, 22:161-173.
3. Bilger W., Björkman O. Role of the xanthophyll cycle in photoprotection elucidated by measurements of light-induced absorbance changes, fluorescence and photosynthesis in leaves of Hedera canariensis. Photosynth. Res. 1990, 25:173-185.
4. Constable G.A., Rawson H.M. Carbon production and utilization in cotton: inferences from a carbon budget. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 1980, 7:539-553.
5. Dai Y., Shen Z., Liu Y., Wang L., Hannaway D., Lu H. Effects of shade treatments on the photosynthetic capacity, chlorophyll fluorescence and chlorophyll content of Tetrastigma hemsleyanum Diels and Gilg. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2009, 65:177-182.
6. Delagrange S., Montpied P., Dreyer E., Messier C., Sinoquet H. Does shade improve light interception efficiency? A comparison among seedlings from shade-tolerant and -intolerant temperate deciduous tree species. New Phytol. 2006, 172:293-304.
7. Demmig-Adams B., Adams W.W. Photoprotection in an ecological context: the remarkable complexity of thermal energy dissipation. New Phytol. 2006, 172:11-21.
8. Demmig-Adams B., Adams W.W., Barker D.H., Logan B.A., Bowling D.R., Verhoeven A.S. Using chlorophyll fluorescence to assess the fraction of absorbed light allocated to thermal dissipation of excess excitation. Physiol. Plant. 1996, 98:253-264.
9. Eckstein J., Beyschlag W., Mott K.A., Ryel R.J. Changes in photon flux can induce stomatal patchiness. Plant Cell Environ. 1996, 19:1066-1074.
10. Eensalu E., Kupper P., Sellin A., Rahi M., Sahi M.A., Kull O. Do stomata operate at the same relative opening range along a canopy profile of Betula pendula?. Funct. Plant Biol. 2008, 35:103-110.
11. Genty B., Briantais J.M., Baker N.R. The relationship between the quantum yield of photosynthetic electron transport and quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1989, 990:87-92.
12. Haldimann P., Feller U. Inhibition of photosynthesis by high temperature in oak (Quercus pubescens) leaves grown under natural conditions closely correlates with a reversible heat-dependent reduction of the activation state of ribulose-1, 5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase. Plant Cell Environ. 2004, 27:1169-1183.
13. Hansen U., Schneiderheinze J., Rank B. Is the lower shade tolerance of Scots pine, relative to pendunculate oak related to the composition of photosynthetic pigments?. Photosynthetica 2002, 40:369-374.
14. Hoagland D.R., Arnon D.I. The Water Culture Method for Growing Plants without Soil 1950, Calif. Agric. Exp. Sta. Cir., 347.
15. Holland N., Richardson A.D. Stomatal length correlates with elevation of growth in four temperate species. J. Sustain. For. 2009, 28:63-73.
16. Hou G., Chen D., Liu B. The microclimatic and eco-physiological effects of shading and pruning of sweet pepper. Acta Hortic. Sin. 1987, 14:251-256.
17. Kalituho L., Beran K.C., Jahns P. The transiently generated non-photochemical quenching of excitation energy in Arabidopsis leaves is modulated by zeaxanthin. Plant Physiol. 2007, 143:1861-1870.
18. Karnovsky M.J. A formaldehyde-glutaraldehyde fixative of high osmolarlity for use in electron microscopy. J. Cell Biol. 1965, 27:137-138.
19. Lichtenthaler H.K., Babani F., Langsdorf G. Chlorophyll fluorescence imaging of photosynthetic activity in sun and shade leaves of trees. Photosynth. Res. 2007, 93:235-244.
20. Niinemets Ü., Kull O. Sensitivity of photosynthetic electron transport to photoinhibition in a temperate deciduous forest canopy: photosystem II center openness, non-radiative energy dissipation and excess irradiance under field conditions. Tree Physiol. 2001, 21:899-914.
21. Niinemets Ü., Kull O., Tenhunen J.D. An analysis of light effects on foliar morphology, physiology and light interception in temperate deciduous woody species of contrasting shade tolerance. Tree Physiol. 1998, 18:681-696.
22. Peri P.L., Moot D.J., Jarvis P., McNeil D.L., Lucas R.J. Morphological, anatomical and physiological changes of orchardgrass leaves grown under fluctuating light regimes. Agron. J. 2007, 99:1502-1513.
23. Sarijeva G., Knapp M., Lichtenthaler H.K. Differences in photosynthetic activity, chlorophyll and carotenoid levels, and in chlorophyll fluorescence parameters in green sun and shade leaves of Gingko and Fagus. J. Plant Physiol. 2007, 164:950-955.
24. Sims D.A., Gebauer R., Pearcy R.W. Scaling sun and shade photosynthetic acclimation of Alocasia macrorrhiza to whole plant performance. II. Simulation of carbon balance and growth at different photon flux densities. Plant Cell Environ. 1994, 17:889-900.
25. Smith H., Whitelam G.C. The shade avoidance syndrome: multiple responses mediated by multiple phytochromes. Plant Cell Environ. 1997, 20:840-844.
26. Soto-Pinto L., Perfecto I., Castillo-Hernandez J., Caballero-Nieto J. Shade effect on coffee production at the northern Tzeltal zone of the state of Chiapas, Mexico. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2000, 80:61-69.
27. Spurr A.R. A low-viscosity epoxy resin embedding medium for electron microscopy. J. Ultrastruct. Res. 1969, 26:31-43.
28. Stephan J., Sinoquet H., Donès N., Haddad N., Talhouk S., Lauri P.E. Light interception and partitioning between shoots in apple cultivars influenced by training. Tree Physiol. 2008, 28:331-342.
29. Syvertsen J.P., Lloyd J.J., McConchie C., Kriedemann P.E., Farquhar G.D. On the relationship between leaf anatomy and CO2 diffusion through the mesophyll of hypostomatous leaves. Plant Cell Environ. 1995, 18:149-157.
30. Takanashi S., Kosugi Y., Matsuo N., Tani M., Ohte N. Patchy stomatal behavior in broad-leaved trees grown in different habitats. Tree Physiol. 2006, 26:1565-1578.
31. Tateno M., Taneda H. Photosynthetically versatile thin shade leaves: a paradox of irradiance-response curves. Photosynthetica 2007, 45:299-302.
32. Terashima I., Hikosaka K. Comparative ecophysiology of leaf and canopy photosynthesis. Plant Cell Environ. 1995, 18:1111-1128.
33. Tichá I. Photosynthetic characteristics during ontogenesis of leaves. 7. Stomata density and sizes. Photosynthetica 1982, 16:375-471.
34. Tsukaya H. Leaf shape: genetic controls and environmental factors. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 2005, 49:547-555.
35. Valladares F., Niinemets Ü. Shade tolerance, a key plant feature of complex nature and consequences. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2008, 39:237-257.
36. Vogelmann T.C., Nishio J.N., Smith W.K. Leaves and light capture: light propagation and gradients of carbon fixation within leaves. Trends Plant Sci. 1996, 1:65-70.
37. Walters R.D. Towards an understanding of photosynthetic acclimation. J. Exp. Bot. 2005, 556:435-447.
38. Wang D., Wu Z., Zhi J. Effects of meteorological factors on the percentage of setting fruit of summer and autumn eggplants in Beijing district. Acta Hortic. Sin. 1980, 7:31-36.
39. Zhang J.Z., Shi L., Shi A.P., Zhang Q.X. Photosynthetic responses of four Hosta cultivars to shade treatments. Photosynthetica 2004, 42:213-218.