Population-based determinants of radical prostatectomy surgical margin positivity

BJU International

Volumn 107, Issue 11, 2011, Pages 1734-1740

  Williams, Stephen B ^a   D'Amico, Anthony V ^a   Weinberg, Aaron C ^a   Gu, Xiangmei ^a   Lipsitz, Stuart R ^a   Hu, Jim C ^a,b,c  

^a BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c Division of Urology   (United States)

Author keywords

minimally invasive; outcomes; positive margins; prostatectomy; surgeon volume

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER STAGING; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CLINICAL FEATURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POPULATION BASED CASE CONTROL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATECTOMY; QUALITY CONTROL; SELF EVALUATION; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL RISK;

AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; BENCHMARKING; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; DATABASES, FACTUAL; DISEASE-FREE SURVIVAL; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; LAPAROSCOPY; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; NEOPLASM STAGING; ODDS RATIO; PROGNOSIS; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEER PROGRAM; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 79956345098     PISSN: 14644096     EISSN: 1464410X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09662.x     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Swindle P, Eastham JA, Ohori M, et al,. Do margins matter? The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens. J Urol 2005; 174: 903-7 (Pubitemid 41140626)
2. Van der Kwast TH, Bolla M, Van Poppel H, et al,. Identification of patients with prostate cancer who benefit from immediate postoperative radiotherapy: EORTC 22911. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25: 4178-86 (Pubitemid 47548556)
3. Thompson IM, Tangen CM, Paradelo J, et al,. Adjuvant radiotherapy for pathological T3N0M0 prostate cancer significantly reduces risk of metastases and improves survival: long-term followup of a randomized clinical trial. J Urol 2009; 181: 956-62
4. Hu JC, Wang Q, Pashos CL, Lipsitz SR, Keating NL,. Utilization and outcomes of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26: 2278-84
5. Smith JA Jr, Chan RC, Chang SS, et al,. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2007; 178: 2385-9; discussion 9-90
6. Ellis WJ, Lange PH,. Point: open radical prostatectomy should not be abandoned. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2007; 5: 685-8 (Pubitemid 47265561)
7. Ye M, Zhao Y, Norman VL, et al,. Antibiofilm phenylethanoid glycosides from Penstemon centranthifolius. Phytother Res 2010; 24: 778-81
8. Klabunde CN, Potosky AL, Legler JM, Warren JL,. Development of a comorbidity index using physician claims data. J Clin Epidemiol 2000; 53: 1258-67 (Pubitemid 32007842)
9. D'Amico AV, Whittington R, Malkowicz SB, et al,. Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. J Am Med Assoc 1998; 280: 969-74 (Pubitemid 28445094)
10. Cooperberg MR, Broering JM, Kantoff PW, Carroll PR,. Contemporary trends in low risk prostate cancer: risk assessment and treatment. J Urol 2007; 178: S14-19 (Pubitemid 47224952)
11. Hu JC, Gold KF, Pashos CL, Mehta SS, Litwin MS,. Role of surgeon volume in radical prostatectomy outcomes. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21: 401-5 (Pubitemid 46606466)
12. Begg CB, Riedel ER, Bach PB, et al,. Variations in morbidity after radical prostatectomy. N Engl J Med 2002; 346: 1138-44 (Pubitemid 34984605)
13. Rao JNK, Scott AJ,. The analysis of categorical data from complex surveys: chi-squared tests for goodness of fit and independence in two-way tables. J Am Stat Assoc 1981; 76: 221-30
14. Zeger SL, Liang KY,. Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes. Biometrics 1986; 42: 121-30
15. Wolfinger ROCM,. Generalized linear mixed models: a pseudo-likelihood approach. J Stat Comput Simul 1993; 4: 233-43
16. Carroll PR, Albertsen PC, Jr JAS, Howards SS,. Volume of major surgeries performed by recent and more senior graduates from North American urology training programs. J Urol 2006; 175: abstract 2
17. Mettlin C,. The American Cancer Society National Prostate Cancer Detection Project and National patterns of prostate cancer detection and treatment. CA Cancer J Clin 1997; 47: 265-72 (Pubitemid 27405932)
18. Agresti A,. Categorical Data Analysis, 2nd edn. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2002
19. Pires AM, Amado C,. Interval estimators for a binomial proportion: comparisons of twenty methods. REVSTAT Stat J 2008; 6: 165-97
20. Vickers AJ, Bianco FJ, Serio AM, et al. The surgical learning curve for prostate cancer control after radical prostatectomy. J Natl Cancer Inst 2007; 99: 1171-7 (Pubitemid 47233067)
21. Vickers AJ, Savage CJ, Hruza M, et al. The surgical learning curve for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol 2009; 10: 475-80
22. TM. Urol Oncol 2010; 28: 268-73
23. Walsh PC, Marschke P, Ricker D, Burnett AL,. Use of intraoperative video documentation to improve sexual function after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 2000; 55: 62-7 (Pubitemid 30050759)
24. Hu JC, Gold KF, Pashos CL, Mehta SS, Litwin MS,. Temporal trends in radical prostatectomy complications from 1991 to 1998. J Urol 2003; 169: 1443-8 (Pubitemid 36323804)
25. Walsh PC,. Anatomic radical prostatectomy: evolution of the surgical technique. J Urol 1998; 160: 2418-24
26. Lu-Yao GL, McLerran D, Wasson J, Wennberg JE,. An assessment of radical prostatectomy. Time trends, geographic variation, and outcomes. The Prostate Patient Outcomes Research Team. J Am Med Assoc 1993; 269: 2633-6
27. Cooperberg MR, Cowan J, Broering JM, Carroll PR,. High-risk prostate cancer in the United States, 1990-2007. World J Urol 2008; 26: 211-18
28. Walsh PC, DeWeese TL, Eisenberger MA,. Clinical practice. Localized prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 2007; 357: 2696-705
29. Eastham JA, Kattan MW, Riedel E, et al,. Variations among individual surgeons in the rate of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens. J Urol 2003; 170: 2292-5 (Pubitemid 37413978)
30. Chun FK, Briganti A, Antebi E, et al,. Surgical volume is related to the rate of positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy in European patients. BJU International 2006; 98: 1204-9 (Pubitemid 44721225)
31. Bianco FJ, Jr, Vickers AJ, Cronin AM, et al,. Variations among experienced surgeons in cancer control after open radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2010; 183: 977-82
32. Wieder JA, Soloway MS,. Incidence, etiology, location, prevention and treatment of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J Urol 1998; 160: 299-315 (Pubitemid 29476668)
33. Guru KA, Hussain A, Chandrasekhar R, et al,. Current status of robot-assisted surgery in urology: a multi-national survey of 297 urologic surgeons. Can J Urol 2009; 16: 4736-41; discussion 41