Allelochemicals identified from Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) residues and their potential inhibitory activity in the field and laboratory

Scientia Horticulturae

Volumn 129, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 361-368

  Tesio, Franco ^a   Weston, Leslie A ^b   Ferrero, Aldo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURIN   (Italy)

^b CHARLES STURT UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Helianthus tuberosus; Phenolics; Phytotoxicity; Plant invasion; Residue degradation

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL PRACTICE; ALLELOPATHY; AQUEOUS SOLUTION; BIOCONTROL AGENT; BIOLOGICAL CONTROL; BIOLOGICAL INVASION; CULTIVAR; DICOTYLEDON; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; GROWTH RATE; HERBICIDE; INHIBITOR; PESTICIDE APPLICATION; PESTICIDE RESIDUE; PHENOLIC COMPOUND; PHYTOTOXICITY; WEED CONTROL;

EUROPE;

CYNARA SCOLYMUS; HELIANTHUS TUBEROSUS; LACTUCA;

EID: 79956337556     PISSN: 03044238     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2011.04.003     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Azania A.A.P.M., Azania C.A.M., Alves P.L.C.A., Palaniraj R., Kadian H.S., Sati S.C., Rawat L.S., Dahiya D.S., Narwal S.S. Allelopathic plants. 7. Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Allelopathy J. 2003, 11:1-20.
2. Batish D.R., Singh H.P., Kohli R.K., Kaur S. Crop allelopathy and its role in ecological agriculture. Allelopathy in Agroecosistems 2001, 121-161. Haworth Press, New York. R.K. Kohli, H.P. Singh, D.R. Batish (Eds.).
3. Ben-Hammouda M., Kremer R.J., Minor H.C., Sarwar M. A chemical basis for differential allelopathic potential of sorghum hybrids on wheat. J. Chem. Ecol. 1995, 21:775-786.
4. Bertin C., Senesac A.F., Rossi F.S., DiTommaso A., Weston L. Evaluation of selected fine-leaf fescue cultivars for their turfgrass quality and weed suppressive ability in field settings. HortTechnology 2009, 19:660-668.
5. Blum U., Shafer S.R., Lehman M.E. Evidence for inhibitory allelopathic interactions involving phenolic acids in field soils: concepts vs. experimental model. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 1999, 18:673-693.
6. Cassells A.C., Walsh M. Screening for Sclerotinia resistance in Helianthus tuberosus L. (Jerusalem artichoke) varieties, lines and somaclones, in the field and in vitro. Plant Pathol. 1995, 44:428-437.
7. Cedergreen N., Ritz C., Streibig J.C. Improved empirical models describing hormesis. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2005, 24:3166-3172.
8. Chon S.U., Kim Y.M., Lee J.C. Herbicidal potential and quantifications of causative allelochemicals from several Compositae weeds. Weed Res. 2003, 43:444-450.
9. Duke S.O., Dayan F.E., Romagni J.G., Rimando A.M. Natural products as sources of herbicides: current status and future trends. Weed Res. 2000, 40:99-111.
10. Follis F., Tesio F., Crivellari A., Vidotto F., Ferrero A. Evaluation of allelopathic potential of Helianthus tuberosus L. root exudates. EWRS 15th Symposium 2010, 100. A.C.B. Ltd (Ed.).
11. Haig T.J., Haig T.J., Seal A.N., Pratley J.E., An M., Wu H. Lavender as a source of novel plant compounds for the development of a natural herbicide. J. Chem. Ecol. 2009, 35:1129-1136.
12. Hall A.B., Blum U., Fites R.C. Stress modification of allelopathy of Helianthus annuus L. debris on seed germination. Am. J. Bot. 1982, 69:776-783.
13. Inderjit Plant phenolics in allelopathy. Bot. Rev. 1996, 62:186-202.
14. Jung V., Olsson E., Caspersen S., Asp H., Jensén P., Alsanius B.W. Response of young hydroponically grown tomato plants to phenolic acids. Sci. Hortic. 2004, 100:23-37.
15. Kong C., Xu X., Hu F., Chen X., Ling B., Tan Z. Using specific secondary metabolites as markers to evaluate allelopathic potentials of rice varieties and individual plants. Chin. Sci. Bull. 2002, 47:839-843.
16. Patterson D.T. Effects of allelopathic chemicals on growth and physiological responses of soybean (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 1981, 29:53-59.
17. Petchey O.L. Integrating methods that investigate how complementarity influences ecosystem functioning. Oikos 2003, 101:323-330.
18. Reigosa M.J., Sanchez-Moreiras A., Gonzales L. Ecophysiolocal approach in allelopathy. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 1999, 18:577-608.
19. Saggese E., Foglia T., Leather G., Thompson M., Bills D., Hoagland P. Fractionation of allelochemicals from oilseed sunflowers and Jerusalem Artichokes. The Chemistry of Allelopathy: Biochemical Interactions Among Plants 1985, 99-112. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC. A. Thompson (Ed.).
20. Schittenhelm S. Competition and control of volunteer Jerusalem artichoke in various crops. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 1996, 176:103-110.
21. Schnitzler A., Hale B.W., Alsum E.M. Examining native and exotic species diversity in European riparian forests. Biol. Conserv. 2007, 138:146-156.
22. Seiler G.J. Forage and tuber yields and digestibility of selected wild and cultivated genotypes of Jerusalem artichoke. Agron. J. 1993, 85:29-33.
23. Seiler G.J., Campbell L.G. Genetic variability for mineral element concentrations of wild Jerusalem artichoke forage. Crop Sci. 2004, 44:289-292.
24. Shettel N.L., Nelson E.B. Plant growth response to several allelopathic chemicals. Weed Sci. 1983, 31:293-298.
25. Ritz C., Streibig J.C. Bioassay analysis using R. J. Stat. Softw. 2005, 12:1-18.
26. Swanton C.J., Cavers P.B., Clements D.R., Moore M.J. The biology of Canadian weeds. 101. Helianthus tuberosus L. Can. J. Plant Sci. 1992, 72:1367-1382.
27. Tesio F., Ferrero A. Allelopathy, a chance for sustainable weed management. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. World Ecol. 2010, 17:377-389.
28. Tesio F., Vidotto F., Weston L.A., Ferrero A. Allelopathic effects of aqueous leaf extracts of Helianthus tuberosus L. Allelopathy J. 2008, 22:47-58.
29. Tesio F., Weston L.A., Vidotto F., Ferrero A. Potential allopathic effects of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus) leaf tissues. Weed Technol. 2010, 24:378-385.
30. Török K., Botta-Dukát Z., Dancza I., Németh I., Kiss J., Mihály B., Magyar D. Invasion gateways and corridors in the Carpathian basin: biological invasions in Hungary. Biol. Invasions 2003, 5:349-356.
31. Vidotto F., Tesio F., Ferrero A. Allelopathic effects of Helianthus tuberosus L. on germination and seedling growth of several crops and weeds. Biol. Agric. Hortic. 2008, 26:55-68.
32. Wadsworth R.A., Collingham Y.C., Willis S.G., Huntley B., Hulme P.E. Simulating the spread and management of alien riparian weeds: are they out of control?. J. Appl. Ecol. 2000, 37:28-38.
33. Wall D.A., Ferdinand A.K., Friesen G.H. Control of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus) in barley (Hordeum vulgare). Weed Sci. 1986, 34:761-764.
34. Weston L.A. Utilization of allelopathy for weed management in agroecosystems. Agronomy J. 1996, 88:860-866.
35. Weston L.A. History and current trends in the use of allelopathy for weed management. HortTechnology 2005, 15:529-534.
36. Weston L.A., Duke S.O. Weed and crop allelopathy. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2003, 22:367-389.
37. Weston L.A., Harmon R., Mueller S. Allelopathic potential of sorghum-sudangrass hybrid (sudex). J. Chem. Ecol. 1989, 15:1855-1865.
38. Whitehead D.C. Identification of p-hydroxybenzoic, vanillic, p-coumaric and ferulic acids in soils. Nature 1964, 202:417-418.
39. Wyse D.L., Young F.L. Jerusalem artichoke interference in corn [=maize] and soybeans. Proceedings North Central Weed Control Conference 1980, 1979.
40. Wyse D.L., Young F.L., Jones R.J. Influence of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus) density and duration of interference on soybean (Glycine max) growth and yield. Weed Sci. 1986, 34:243-247.
41. Xuan T.D., Shinkichi T., Khanh T.D., Min C.I. Biological control of weeds and plant pathogens in paddy rice by exploiting plant allelopahty: an overview. Crop Prot. 2005, 24:197-206.
42. Zaghi C. La nuova direttiva comunitaria sull'uso sostenibile dei prodotti fitosanitari: prospettive e criticità della sua applicazione. Protezione dei corpi idrici superficiali dall'inquinamento da agrofarmaci 2009, 1-5. Tipografia Fiordo s.r.l, Bologna, Italy. F. Vidotto, A. Ferrero (Eds.).