Potential allelopathic effects of jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus) leaf tissues

Weed Technology

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 378-385

  Tesio, Franco ^a   Weston, Leslie A ^b,c   Vidotto, Francesco ^a   Ferrero, Aldo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURIN   (Italy)

^b Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

^c CHARLES STURT UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

crop rotation; Phytotoxicity; plant invasion; residue degradation

Indexed keywords

AGRONOMY; ALLELOPATHY; BIODEGRADATION; BIOFUEL; BIOLOGICAL INVASION; BIOMASS; CEREAL; CROP ROTATION; CULTIVATION; ETHANOL; FRUIT; FUNCTIONAL MORPHOLOGY; GERMINATION; HERB; LEAFY VEGETABLE; NUMERICAL MODEL; PHYTOTOXICITY; POPULATION STRUCTURE; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SPECIES DIVERSITY; WEED CONTROL; WILD POPULATION;

SOUTHERN EUROPE;

AMARANTHUS; AMARANTHUS RETROFLEXUS; CHENOPODIUM ALBUM; CUCURBITA PEPO; CUCURBITA PEPO VAR. MELOPEPO; DIGITARIA SANGUINALIS; ECHINOCHLOA; ECHINOCHLOA CRUS-GALLI; HELIANTHUS TUBEROSUS; LACTUCA; LACTUCA SATIVA; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; ORYZA SATIVA; PISUM SATIVUM; PORTULACA OLERACEA; PORTULACACEAE; SOLANUM NIGRUM; TRITICUM AESTIVUM; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 77956865435     PISSN: 0890037X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1614/WT-D-09-00065.1     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Azania, A.A.P.M., et al. 2003. Allelopathic plants. 7. Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Allel. J. 11:1-20.
2. Bertholdsson, N. O. 2004. Variation in allelopathic activity over 100 years of barley selection and breeding. Weed Res. (Oxford) 44:78-86.
3. Brown, S. N. and K. Stewartson. 1983. On an integral equation of marginal separation. Siam J. Appl. Math. 43:1119-1126.
4. Burden, R. and J. Faires, eds. 1988. Numerical Analysis. 4th ed. Boston: PWS Publishing.
5. Callaway, R. M., S. C. Pennings, and C. L. Richards. 2003. Phenotypic plasticity and interactions among plants. Ecology 84:1115-1128.
6. DongZhi, L., E. Tsuzuki, Y. Sugimoto, D. YanJun, M. Matsuo, and H. Terao. 2004a. Allelopathic effects of aqueous Aloe vera leaf extracts on selected crops. Allel. J. 13:67-74.
7. DongZhi, L., E. Tsuzuki, D. YanJun, H. Terao, and T. D. Xuan. 2004b. Potential biological control of weeds in rice fields by allelopathy of dwarf lilyturf plants. BioControl 49:187-196.
8. Fehér, A. 2007. Historical reconstruction of expansion of non-native plants in the Nitra river basin (sw Slovakia). Kanitzia 15:47-62.
9. Harper, J. L. 1964. The nature and consequence of interference among plants. Pages 465-481 in Proccedings of the 11th International Conference of Genetics. The Hague, the Netherlands.
10. Hong, N. H., T. D. Xuan, E. Tsuzuki, H. Terao, M. Matsuo, and T. D. Khanh. 2004. Weed control of four higher plant species in paddy rice fields in Southeast Asia. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 190:59-64.
11. Hua, S., P. ShaoLin, W. XiaoYi, Z. DeQing, and Z. Chi. 2005. Potential allelochemicals from an invasive weed Mikania micrantha H.B.K. J. Chem. Ecol. 31:1657-1668.
12. Khanh, T. D., N. H. Hong, T. D. Xuan, and I. M. Chung. 2005. Paddy weed control by medicinal and leguminous plants from Southeast Asia. Crop Prot. 24:421-431.
13. Leather, G. R. 1983. Sunflowers (Helianthus annus) are allelopathic to weeds. Weed Sci. 31:37-42.
14. Macías, F. A., A. Oliveros-Bastidas, D. Marín, D. Castellano, A. M. Simonet, and J.M.G. Molinillo. 2004. Degradation studies on benzoxazinoids. Soil degradation dynamics of 2,4-dihydroxy-7-methoxy-(2H)-1,4- benzoxazin- 3(4H)-one (DIMBOA) and its degradation products, phytotoxic allelochemicals from Gramineae. J. Agric. Food Chem. 52:6402-6413.
15. Molisch, H. 1937. Der einfluss einer pflanze auf die andere-allelopathie. Jena, Germany: Gustav Fischer Verlag Jena. 106p.
16. Orr, S. P., J. A. Rudgers, and K. Clay. 2005. Invasive plants can inhibit native tree seedlings: testing potential allelopathic mechanisms. Plant Ecol. 181:153-165.
17. Protopopova, V., M. Shevera, and S. Mosyakin. 2006. Deliberate and unintentional introduction of invasive weeds: a case study of the alien flora of Ukraine. Euphytica 148:17-33.
18. Putnam, A. R. and W. O. Duke. 1974. Biological suppression of weeds: evidence for allelopathy in accessions of cucumber. Science 185:370-372.
19. Reigosa, M. J., A. Sanchez-Moreiras, and L. Gonzales. 1999. Ecophysiolocal approach in allelopathy. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 18:577-608.
20. Schittenhelm, S. 1996. Competition and control of volunteer Jerusalem artichoke in various crops. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 176:103-110.
21. Saggese, E., T. Foglia, G. Leather, M. Thompson, D. Bills, and P. Hoagland. 1985. Fractionation of allelochemicals from oilseed sunflowers and Jerusalem artichokes. Pages 99-112 in A. Thompson, ed. The Chemistry of Allelopathy: Biochemical Interactions among Plants. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society.
22. Schnitzler, A., B. W. Hale, and E. M. Alsum. 2007. Examining native and exotic species diversity in European riparian forests. Biol. Conserv. 138:146-156.
23. Swanton, C. J. and P. B. Cavers. 1988. Regenerative capacity of rhizomes and tubers from two populations of Helianthus tuberosus L. (Jerusalem artichoke). Weed Res. 28:339-345.
24. Swanton, C. J., P. B. Cavers, D. R. Clements, and M. J. Moore. 1992. The biology of Canadian weeds. 101. Helianthus tuberosus L. Can. J. Plant Sci. 72:1367-1382.
25. Tesio, F., F. Vidotto, L. A. Weston, and A. Ferrero. 2008. Allelopathic effects of aqueous leaf extracts of Helianthus tuberosus L. Allel. J. 22:47-58.
26. Török, K., Z. Botta-Dukát, I. Dancza, I. Németh, J. Kiss, B. Mihály, and D. Magyar. 2003. Invasion gateways and corridors in the Carpathian basin: biological invasions in Hungary. Biol. Inv. 5:349-356.
27. Vendula, Š . 2008 Invasive plant species in riverbank vegetation of water courses in the basin of the Ploucnice River. GeoScape 3: 33-37.
28. Vidotto, F., F. Tesio, and A. Ferreo. 2008. Allelopathic effects of Helianthus tuberosus L. on germination and seedling growth of several crops and weeds. Biol. Agric. Hort. 26:55-68.
29. Vivanco, J. M., H. P. Bais, F. R. Stermitz, G. C. Thelen, and R. M. Callaway. 2004. Biogeographical variation in community response to root allelochemistry: novel weapons and exotic invasion. Ecol. Lett. 7:285-292.
30. Wadsworth, R. A., Y. C. Collingham, S. G. Willis, B. Huntley, and P. E. Hulme. 2000. Simulating the spread and management of alien riparian weeds: are they out of control? J. Appl. Ecol. 37:28-38.
31. Wall, D. A. and G. H. Friesen. 1989. Volunteer Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus) interference and control in barley (Hordeum vulgare). Weed Technol. 3:170-172.
32. Walter, J., F. Essl, T. Englisch, and M. Kiehn. 2005. Neophytes in Austria: habitat preferences and ecological effects. NEOBIOTA 6:13-25.
33. Weston, L. A. 1996. Utilization of allelopathy for weed management in agroecosystems. Agron. J. 88:860-866.
34. Weston, L. A. 2005. History and current trends in the use of allelopathy for weed management. HortTechnology 15:529-534.
35. Wyse, D. L. and F. L. Young. 1980. Jerusalem artichoke interference in corn [5maize] and soybeans. Pages 48 in Proceedings of the North Central Weed Control Conference. Milwaukee, WI: North Central Weed Science Society.
36. Wyse, D. L., F. L. Young, and R. J. Jones. 1986. Influence of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus) density and duration of interference on soybean (Glycine max) growth and yield. Weed Sci. 34:243-247.
37. Xuan, T. D., T. Eiji, T. Shinkichi, and T. D. Khanh. 2004. Methods to determine allelopathic potential of crop plants for weed control. Allel. J. 13:149-164.
38. Xuan, T. D. and E. Tsuzuki. 2004. Allelopathic plants: buckwheat (Fagopyrum spp.). Allel. J. 13:137-148.