Decentralized damage identification using wavelet signal analysis embedded on wireless smart sensors

Engineering Structures

Volumn 33, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 2162-2172

  Yun, Gun Jin ^a   Lee, Soon Gie ^a   Carletta, Joan ^a   Nagayama, Tomonori ^b  

^a University of Akron   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

Author keywords

Damage detection; Structural health monitoring; Wavelet entropy; Wavelet transform; Wireless smart sensor

Indexed keywords

BASIS FUNCTIONS; DAMAGE IDENTIFICATION; DISCRETE WAVELETS; EXPERIMENTAL TEST; FOURIER; SHEAR BUILDINGS; SPATIAL LOCATION; TRANSFORM METHODS; TRUSS BRIDGE; WAVELET COEFFICIENTS; WAVELET ENTROPIES; WAVELET-BASED APPROACH; WIRED SENSORS; WIRELESS SENSOR; WIRELESS SMART SENSOR; WIRELESS SMART SENSORS;

ENTROPY; FOURIER TRANSFORMS; SIGNAL ANALYSIS; SIGNAL DETECTION; SMART SENSORS; STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING; TRUSSES; WAVELET TRANSFORMS;

DAMAGE DETECTION;

DAMAGE; DETECTION METHOD; FOURIER TRANSFORM; HEALTH MONITORING; IDENTIFICATION METHOD; MULTISTOREY BUILDING; SENSOR; SIGNAL PROCESSING; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS; WAVELET ANALYSIS;

EID: 79956318737     PISSN: 01410296     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.03.007     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Wang Y., Lynch J.P., Law K.H. A wireless structural health monitoring system with multithreaded sensing devices: design and validation. Struct Infrastruct Eng 2007, 3(2):103-120.
2. Gao Y., Spencer B.F., Ruiz-Sandoval M. Distributed computing strategy for structural health monitoring. Struct Control Health Monit 2006, 13(1):488-507.
3. Nagayama T., Spencer B.F., Mechitov K.A., Agha G.A. Middleware services for structural health monitoring using smart sensors. Smart Struct Syst 2009, 5(2):119-137.
4. Weng J.H., Loh C.H., Lynch J.P., Lu K.C., Lin P.Y., Wang Y. Output-only modal identification of a cable-stayed bridge using wireless monitoring systems. Eng Struct 2008, 30(7):1820-1830.
5. Lynch J.P., Wang Y., Loh K.J., Yi J.H., Yun C.B. Performance monitoring of the Geumdang Bridge using a dense network of high-resolution wireless sensors. Smart Mater Struct 2006, 15(6):1561-1575.
6. Chung HC, Enotomo T, Loh K, Shinozuka M. Real-time visualization of bridge structural response through wireless MEMS sensors. In: Proc. SPIE-the int. society for optical engineering. 2004.
7. Stubbs N, Kim JT, Topole K. An efficient and robust algorithm for damage localization in offshore platforms. In: Proceedings of the ASCE 10th structures congress. San Antonio (TX). 1992.
8. Newland D.E. Random vibrations, spectral and wavelet analysis 1993, Harlow and John Wiley, New York. 3rd ed.
9. Sun Z., Chang C.C. Structural damage assessment based on wavelet packet transform. J Struct Eng-ASCE 2002, 128(10):1354-1361.
10. Wang Q., Deng X.M. Damage detection with spatial wavelets. Internat J Solids Structures 1999, 36(23):3443-3468.
11. Kim H.S., Melhem H. Damage detection of structures by wavelet analysis. Eng Struct 2004, 26(3):347-362.
12. Rosso O.A., Martin M.T., Figliola A., Keller K., Plastino A. EEG analysis using wavelet-based information tools. J Neurosci Methods 2006, 153(2):163-182.
13. Ren W.X., Sun Z.S. Structural damage identification by using wavelet entropy. Eng Struct 2008, 30(10):2840-2849.
14. Poudel U.P., Fu G.K., Ye H. Wavelet transformation of mode shape difference function for structural damage location identification. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 2007, 36(8):1089-1107.
15. Pakrashi V., O'Connor A., Basu B. A study on the effects of damage models and wavelet bases for damage identification and calibration in beams. Computer-Aided Civil Infrastruct. Eng. 2007, 22(8):555-569.
16. Messina A, Jones IA, Williams EJ. Damage detection and localisation using natural frequency changes. In: Proceedings conference identification in engineering systems. Swansea (UK). 1996.
17. Castaneda NE, Sun F, Dyke SJ, Lu C, Hope A, Nagayama T. Implementation of a correlation-based decentralized damage detection method using wireless sensors. In: The 8th international conference on advances in structural engineering and mechanics. Jeju (South Korea). 2008.
18. Nagayama T, Spencer BF. Structural health monitoring using smart sensors. In: NSEL report, series 001. Urbana: University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign; 2007. https://www.ideals.uiuc.edu/handle/2142/3521.
19. ISHMP, Illinois structural health monitoring project. Accessed on February 6 2009. http://shm.cs.uiuc.edu/ishmpstart.html.
20. Rice JA, Spencer BF. Structural health monitoring sensor development for the Imote2 platform. In: Proceedings SPIE smart structures/NDE. San Diego (CA). 2008.
21. Castaneda NE. In-situ wireless sensing for distributed structural health monitoring. Department of mechanical, aerospace and structural engineering, Washington University in St. Louis; 2008.
22. Peairs DM, Park G, Inman DJ. Sensing area analysis for actuator placement with model of impedance-based SHM. In: Proceedings of 5th international workshop on structural health monitoring. Stanford (CA). September 12-14, 2005.
23. Liberatore S, Carman GP. Damage detection of structures based on spectral methods using piezoelectric materials. In: Proceedings of international workshop on structural health monitoring. Stanford (CA). September 12-14, 2003.
24. Shang S, Yun GJ, Lee SG, Caicedo JM, Narasimhan S. Development of a benchmark laboratory structure for finite element model updating. In: The 5th international conference on bridge maintenance, safety and management. Philadelphia (PA). 2010.