Development of a benchmark laboratory structure for finite-element model updating

Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization - Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Bridge Maintenance, Safety and Management

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 285-291

  Shang, S ^a   Yun, G J ^a   Lee, S G ^a   Caicedo, J ^b   Narasimhan, S ^c  

^a University of Akron   (United States)

^b The Department of Mechanical Engineering   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL METHOD; BENCH-MARK PROBLEMS; BENCHMARK PROGRAMS; BENCHMARK STRUCTURE; BRIDGE STRUCTURES; DYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS; EIGEN-STRUCTURE; FINITE ELEMENT MODELS; FINITE-ELEMENT MODEL UPDATING; JOINT STIFFNESS; MODE SHAPES; MODEL UPDATING; MODEL UPDATING TECHNIQUES; NUMERICAL MODELS; PERFORMANCE INDICES; RECONFIGURABLE STRUCTURE; RESEARCH EFFORTS; STEEL TRUSS BRIDGE;

IMPACT TESTING; MAINTAINABILITY; STEEL BRIDGES;

FINITE ELEMENT METHOD;

EID: 84863032130     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Agrawal, A., and Nagarajaiah, S. 2009. Benchmark structural control problem for a seismically excited highway bridge: Phase I and II STRUCTURAL CONTROL & HEALTH MONITORING, 16(5): 503-508.
2. Arora, V., Singh, S. P., and Kundra, T. K. 2009. Finite element model updating with damping identification Journal of Sound and Vibration, 324(3-5): 1111-1123.
3. Beck, J. L., and Katafygiotis, L. S. 1998. Updating Models and Their Uncertainties. I: Bayesian Statistical Framework %J Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 124(4): 455-461.
4. Belouchrani, A., AbedMeraim, K., Cardoso, J. F., and Moulines, E. 1997. A blind source separation technique using second-order statistics IEEE Trans. Signal Process., 45(2): 434-444.
5. Caicedo, J. M., Catbas, F. N., Gul, M., Zaurin, R., and Dyke, S. J. 2006. Benchmark Problem for Bridge Health Monitoring: Definition Paper. Proceedings of the World Conference on Structural Control and Monitoring, San Diego, California.
6. Caicedo, J. M., Dyke, S. J., and Johnson, E. A. 2004. Natural excitation technique and eigensystem realization algorithm for phase I of the IASC-ASCE benchmark problem: Simulated data Journal of Engineering Mechanics-ASCE, 130(1): 49-60.
7. Caicedo, J. M., Dyke, S. J., Moon, S. J., Bergman, L. A., Turan, G., and Hague, S. 2003. Phase II Benchmark Control Algorithm Problem for Seismic Response of Cable-Stayed Bridges Journal of Structural Control, 10: 137∼168.
8. Catbas, F. N., Caicedo, J. M., and Dyke, S. J. 2006. Development of a Benchmark Problem for Bridge Health Monitoring. Proceedings of the International Conference on Bridge Maintenance, Safety and Management (IABMAS), Porto, Portugal.
9. Dyke, S. J., Caicedo, J. M., Turan, G., Bergman, L. A., and Hague, S. (2002). "Introduction Phase I of the Benchmark Problem on the Seismic Response Control of Cable-Stayed Bridges." In: 7th US National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Boston, Massachusetts.
10. Dyke, S. J., Caicedo, J. M., Turan, G., Bergman, L. A., and Hague, S. 2003. Phase I benchmark control problem for seismic response of cable-stayed bridges Journal of Structural Engineering-ASCE, 129(7): 857-872.
11. Fritzen, C. P., and Zhu, S. 1991. Updating of Finite-Element Models by Means of Measured Information. Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd, 475-486.
12. Hemez, F. M., and Farhat, C. 1995. Structural Damage Detection Via A Finite Element Model Updating Methodology Modal Analysis-the International Journal of Analytical and Experimental Modal Analysis, 10(3): 152-166.
13. James, G. H., Carne, T. G., and Lauffer, J. P. (1993). "The Natural Excitation Technique (NExT) for Modal Parameter Extraction From Operating Wind Turbines." SAND92-1666, Sandia National Laboratory.
14. Katafygiotis, L. S., and Beck, J. L. 1998. Updating Models and Their Uncertainties. II: Model Identifiability %J Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 124(4): 463-467.
15. Ladeveze, P., Nedjar, D., and Reynier, M. 1994. UPDATING OF FINITE-ELEMENT MODELS USING VIBRATION TESTS AIAA Journal, 32(7): 1485-1491.
16. Levin, R. I., and Lieven, N. A. J. 1998. Dynamic finite element model updating using simulated annealing and genetic algorithms Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 12(1): 91-120.
17. Marwala, T. 2002. Finite element model updating using wavelet data and genetic algorithm Journal of Aircraft, 39(4): 709-711.
18. Mottershead, J. E., and Friswell, M. I. 1993. Model Updating in Structural Dynamics:A Survey Journal of Sound and Vibration, 167(2): 347∼375.
19. Nagarajaiah, S., and Narasimhan, S. 2006. Smart baseisolated benchmark building. Part II: phase I sample controllers for linear isolation systems Structural Control & Health Monitoring, 13(2-3): 589-604.
20. Spencer, B. F., Dyke, S. J., and Deoskar, H. S. 1998a. Benchmark problems in structural control: Part I - Active mass driver system Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 27(11): 1127-1139.
21. Spencer, B. F., Dyke, S. J., and Deoskar, H. S. 1998b. Benchmark problems in structural control: Part II - Active tendon system Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 27(11): 1141-1147.
22. Titurus, B., Friswell, M. I., and Starek, L. 2003. Damage detection using generic elements: Part I. Model updating Computers & Structures, 81(24-25): 2273-2286.
23. Van Overschee, P., and De Moor, B. L. 1996. Subspace Identification for Linear System: Theory-Implementation-Applications, 1st Ed., Springer.
24. Yun, G. J., Ogorzalek, K. A., Dyke, S. J., and Song, W. 2008. A Two-Stage Damage Detection Approach based on Subset of Damage Parameters and Genetic Algorithms Smart Structures and Systems, 5(1): 1∼21.