Fusing research into practice: The role of research methods education

Library and Information Science Research

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 191-201

  Luo, Lili ^a  

^a SAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79956312183     PISSN: 07408188     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.lisr.2010.12.001     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Aryee, M. (2002). Measures of association. Unpublished manuscript.
2. Babbie E. The practice of social research 2009, Wadsworth Publishing, Florence, KY.
3. Balslev J. A working librarian's experience with library research. Scandinavian Public Library Quarterly 1989, 4:4-9.
4. Basker J. What librarians need from researchers. New Library World 1985, 86:147-148.
5. Blick A.R. Information science research versus the practitioner. Representation and exchange of knowledge as a basis of information processes 1984, 231-244. North-Holland, Amsterdam. H.J. Dietschmann (Ed.).
6. Bodi S. How can we bridge the gap between what we teach and what they do? Some thoughts on the place of questions in the process of research. Journal of Academic Librarianship 2002, 28:109-114.
7. Crowley B. Spanning the theory-practice divide in library and information science 2005, Scarecrow Press, Oxford, UK.
8. DeVinney G., Tegler P. Preparation for academic librarianship: A survey. College and Research Libraries 1983, 44:223-227.
9. Fister B. The research processes of undergraduate students. Journal of Academic Librarianship 1992, 18:42-43.
10. Fister B. Teaching the rhetorical dimensions of research. Research Strategies 1993, 11:211-219.
11. Haddow G., Klobas J.E. Communication of research to practice in library and information science: Closing the gap. Library & Information Science Research 2004, 26:29-43.
12. Hernon P. Components of the research process: Where do we need to focus attention?. Journal of Academic Librarianship 2001, 27(2):81-89.
13. Hernon P., Schwartz C. Can research be assimilated into the soul of library and information science?. Library & Information Science Research 1995, 17:101-103.
14. Houser L., Schrader A.M. The search for a scientific profession: Library science education in the United States and Canada 1978, Scarecrow Press, Metuchen, NJ.
15. Jarvis P. The practitioner-researcher: Developing theory from practice 1999, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.
16. Lenox M.F. The importance of using research for decision making. Top of the News 1985, 41(3):301-302.
17. Lynam P., Slater M., Walker R. Research and practitioner: Dissemination of research results within the library-information profession 1982, Aslib, London.
18. Maguire C. Problems of research in librarianship. Australian Library Journal 1975, 24:290-296.
19. McClure C. Increasing the usefulness of research for library managers: Propositions, issues and strategies. Library Trends 1989, 38(2):280-294.
20. McClure C.R., Bishop A. The status of research in library and information science: Guarded optimism. College and Research Libraries 1989, 50:127-143.
21. McKechnie L., Julien H., Oliphant T. Communicating research findings to library and information science practitioners: A study of ISIC papers from 1996 to 2000. Information Research 2008, 13(4). Retrieved from. http://informationr.net/ir/13-4/paper375.html.
22. Molholt P. Structuring models of research for information science: Attitudes, perceptions and values. Samuel Lazerow Memorial Lecture presented at the University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 1998.
23. Perkins G.H., Helbig T. The value of LIS schools' research topics to library authors' professional work. Journal of Academic Librarianship 2008, 34(6):513-519.
24. Powell R.R. Basic research methods for librarians 1997, Ablex, Greenwich, CT. 3rd ed.
25. Powell R.R., Baker L.M., Mika J.J. Library and information science practitioners and research. Library & Information Science Research 2002, 24:49-72.
26. Rayward W.B. Library and information sciences: Disciplinary differentiation, competition and convergence. The study of information: Interdisciplinary messages 1983, 343-363. Wiley, New York. F. Machlup, U. Mansfield (Eds.).
27. Riggs D.E. Losing the foundation of understanding. American Libraries 1994, 25:449.
28. Smith N.M., Adams I. Characteristics of research courses in library schools. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science 1992, 33:75-78.
29. Staples G.M. Perceptions of BYU library school research courses and their applications 1982, (Publication No. ED 254232). Retrieved from Education Resources Information Center. http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/custom/portlets/recordDetails/detailmini.jsp?_nfpb=true&_&ERICExtSearch_SearchValue_0=ED254232&ERICExtSearch_SearchType_0=no&accno=ED254232.
30. Stephenson M.S. Teaching research methods in library and information studies programs. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science 1990, 31:49-65.
31. Stoan S.K. Research and library skills: An analysis and interpretation. College and Research Libraries 1984, 45:99-109.
32. Swisher R. Focus on research. Top of the News 1986, 42:175-177.
33. Turner, K. J. (2002, August). Do information professionals use research published in LIS journals? Paper presented at the 68th IFLA Council and General Conference, August 18-24, 2002, Glasgow.
34. Waldhart T.J. Editorial. Library Research 1980, 2:105-106.
35. Watson-Boone R. Academic librarians as practitioner-researchers. Journal of Academic Librarianship 2000, 26(2):85-93.