Estimating the impact of new generation antifoulings on ship performance: The presence of slime

Proceedings of the Institute of Marine Engineering, Science and Technology Part A: Journal of Marine Engineering and Technology

Volumn , Issue 2, 2003, Pages 13-20

  Candries, M ^a   Atlar, M ^a,c,d   Anderson, C D ^b  

^a NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b International Coatings Limited   (United Kingdom)

^c Emerson Cavitation Tunnel   (United Kingdom)

^d International Towing Tank Conference ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTI-FOULINGS; ANTIFOULING; INTERNATIONAL MARITIME ORGANIZATIONS; LITERATURE REVIEWS; SHIP PERFORMANCE; UNIVERSITY OF NEWCASTLE;

COATINGS; MARINE ENGINEERING; SHIPS; TIN;

DRAG;

EID: 79956294512     PISSN: 14761548     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. International Maritime Organization, (2001). International Convention on Control of Harmful Anti-fouling systems on Ships, 25 October 2001.
2. Evans, SM, Birchenough, AC, and Brancato, MS, (2000). The TBT ban: out of the frying pan into the fire? Marine Pollution Bulletin, Vol 40, pp 204-211. (Pubitemid 30122289)
3. Turley, PA, Fenn, RJ, and Ritter, JC, (2000). Pyrithiones as antifoulants: environmental chemistry and preliminary risk assessment, Biofouling, Vol 15, pp 175-182. (Pubitemid 30448435)
4. Anderson, CD, and Hunter, JE, (2000). Whither antifouling paints after TBT? NAV 2000 International Conference on Ship and Shipping Research, 13th Congress, Paper 3.7. Venice, Italy, 19-22 September 2000.
5. Wahl, M, (1989). Marine epibiosis. I: Fouling and antifouling: some basic aspects. Mar Ecol Prog Ser, Vol. 58, pp. 175-189.
6. Brady, RF, andSinger, IL, (2000). Mechanicalfactorsfavoring release from fouling release coatings. Biofouling, 15, pp 73-81.
7. Baier, RE, (1970). Surface properties influencing biological adhesion. In: Adhesion in Biological Systems, RS Manly (Ed), Academic Press, pp 15-48.
8. Meyer, AE, Baier, RE, and King, RW, (1988). Initialfouling of nontoxic coatings in fresh, brackish and sea water. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 66, pp 55-62. (Pubitemid 18591103)
9. Kovach, BS, and Swain, GF, (1998). A boat mounted foil to measure the drag properties of antifouling coatings applied to static immersion panels. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Sea water Drag Reduction, pp 169-173, Newport.
10. Millett, J, and Anderson, CD, (1997). Fighting fast ferry fouling. Fast '97, Conference Papers, Vol 1, pp 493-495.
11. Candries, M, (2001). Drag, Boundary-Layer and Roughness Characteristics of Marine Surfaces Coated with Antifoulings, PhD Thesis, Department of Marine Technology, University of Newcasde upon Tyne.
12. Candries, M, Atlar, M, Guerrero, A, and Anderson, CD, (2001). Lower frictional resistance characteristics offoul-release systems, Proceedings of the Eight International Symposium on the Practical Design of Ships and Other Floating Structures (PRADS 2001), Vol 1, pp 517-523, Elsevier, Amsterdam.
13. th International Congress on Marine Corrosion and Fouling (to be published in a Supplement to Biofouling, February 2003), San Diego, 21-26 July 2002.
14. th International Congress on Marine Corrosion and Fouling, (to be published in a Supplement to Biofouling, February 2003) San Diego, 21-26 July 2002.
15. Gad-el-Hak, M, and Bandyopadhyay, PR, (1994). Reynolds number effects in wall-bounded turbulent flows. Applied Mechanics Review, Vol 49, pp 307-365.
16. Grigson, CWB, (1982).The drag coefficients of arange of ship surfaces II. Trans RINA, Vol 124, pp 183-198.
17. Musker, AJ, (1977). Turbulent shearflows near irregularly rough surfaces with particular reference to ships' hulls, PhD Thesis, University of Liverpool, Liverpool.
18. Townsin, RL, and Dey, SK/1990). The correlation of roughness drag with surface characteristics. International Workshop on Marine Roughness and Drag, RINA, London.
19. ITTC, (1990), Report of the Powering Performance Committee, Proceedings of the 19th International Towing Tank Conference, pp 235-287, Madrid.
20. Chuah, KB, Dey, SK, Thomas, TR, and Townsin, RL, (1990). A digital hull roughness analyser. International Workshop on Marine Roughness and Drag, Paper No 3, RINA, London.
21. Fitzsimmons, PA, and Ellis, J, (1990). A two-parameter roughness analyser and performance monitoring software. International Workshop on Marine Roughness and Drag, Paper No 4, RlNA, London.
22. th International Congress on Marine Corrosion and Fouling (to be published in a Supplement to Biofouling, February 2003), San Diego, 21-26 July 2002.
23. Egan, B, (1987). Marine microbial adhesion and its consequences. In: Microbes in the Sea, MA Sleigh (Ed), Ellis Horwood Ltd.
24. Fletcher, RL, and Chamberlain, AHL, (1975). Marine fouling algae. In: Microbial Aspects of the Deterioration of Materials, R Gilbert and DW Lovelock (Ed), pp 59-81, London, Academic Press Inc.
25. Fischer, EC, Castelli, VJ, Rodgers, SD, and Bleile, HR, (1984). Technology for control of marine biofouling - a review. In: Marine Biodeterioration: An Interdisciplinary Study, JD Gosdow and R C Tipper (Ed), Maryland, USA, Naval Institute Press.
26. Palmer, RJ. and White, DC, (1997). Developmental biology of biofilms: implications for treatment and control. Trends in Microbiology, Vol 5, pp 435-440.
27. Swain G, Anil, AC, Baier, RE, Chia, F-S, Conte E, Cook, A, Hadfield, M, Haslbeck, E, Holm, E, Kavangh, C, Kohrs, D, Kovach, B, Lee, C, Mazzella, L, Meyer, AE, Qian, P-Y, Sawant, SS, Schultz, M, Sigurdsson, J, Smith, C, Soo, L, Terilizzi, A, Wagh, A, Zimmerman, R, and Zupo, V, (2000). Biofouling and barnacle adhesion dataforfouling-release coatings subjected to static immersion at seven marine sites, Biofouling, Vol 16, pp 331-344.
28. McEntee, W, (1915). Variation of frictional resistance of ships with condition of wetted surface. Trans SNAME, Vol 24, pp 37-42.
29. Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (1952). Marine Foulingand its Prevention. Annapolis, Maryland, US Naval Institute.
30. Denny, ME, (1951). BSRA resistance experiments on the 'LucyAshton': Part 1. Fullscale measurements. Trans RlNA, Vol 93, pp 40-57.
31. Watanabe, S, Nagamatsu, N, Yokoo, K, and Kawakami, Y, (1969). The augmentation infrictional resistance due to slime, (BSRA Translation No 3454). Journal of the Kansai Society of Naval Architects, Vol 131, pp 45.
32. Todd, FH, (1951). Skin friction resistance and the effects of surface roughness. Trans SNAME, Vol 59, pp 315-374.
33. Loeb, GI, Laster, D, and Gracik, T, (1984). Theinfluence of microbial fouling films on hydrodynamic drag of rotating disks. In: Marine Biodeterioration: An Interdisciplinary Study, JD Gostlow and RC Tipper (Ed), Maryland, USA, Naval Institute Press.
34. Lewkowicz, AK, and Das, PK, (1986). Turbulent boundary layers on rough surfaces with and without a pliable overlayer. a simulation of marine fouling, International Shipbuilding Progress, Vol 33, pp 174-186. (Pubitemid 17482957)
35. El-Labbad, AF, (1987). Techno-economic Analysis of the Problems of the Bottom Maintenance of Ships, MPhil Thesis, Department of Marine Technology, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne.
36. Picologlou, BF, Zelver, N, and Characklis, WG, (1980). Biofilm growth and hydraulic performance, Journal of the Hydraulics Division, Proceedings of the American Society of Civil Engineers, Vol 106, pp 733-746.
37. Stoodley, P, Boyle, J, Cunningham AB, Dodds, I, Lappin-Scott, HM, and Lewandowski, Z, (1999). Biofilm structure and influence on biofouling under laminar and turbulent flows. In: CW Keevil, A Godfree, D Holt, and C Dow, (Eds), Biofilms in the Aquatic Environment, The Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, UK, pp 13-24.
38. Stoodley, P, Boyle, JD, deBeer, D, and Lappin-Scott, HM, (1999). Evolving perspectives of biofilm structure, Biofouling, Vol 14, pp 75-90.
39. Schultz, MP, and Swain, GW, (1999). The effect of biofilms on turbulent boundary layers. Journal of Fluids Engineering, Vol 121, pp 44-51.
40. Lewthwaite, JC, Molland, AF, and Thomas, KW, (1985). An investigation into the variation of ship skin frictional resistance with fouling. Trans RINA, Vol 127, pp 269-284.
41. Bohlander, GS, (1991).Biofilm effects on drag: measurements on ships. Polymers in a Marine Environment. The Institute of Marine Engineers Third International Conference, Paper 16. London.
42. Hoyt, JW, and Soli, G, (1965). Algal cultures: ability to reduce turbulent friction inflow, Science, Vol 149, pp 1509.
43. Bamaby, KC, and Dorey, AL, (1965). A towing tank storm. Trans RINA, Vol 107, pp 265-272.
44. Emerson, A, (1965). Model experiments using dilute polymer solutions instead of water, Trans NEQES, Vol 81, pp 201-212.
45. Hawkridge, HRJ, and Gadd, GE, (1971). Investigation of drag reduction by certain algae, Nature, Vol 230, pp 253-255.
46. Rosen, MW, and Comford, NE, (1971). Fluidfriction of fish slimes. Nature, Vol 234, pp 49-51.
47. Hoyt, JW, (1990). Dragrerfuction by polymers and surfactants. In: Viscous Drag Reduction in Boundary Layers, DM Bushnell and JN Hefner (Eds), American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, pp 413-432, Washington, DC.
48. th European Drag Reduction Working Meeting, Z Chara and J Pollert, (Eds), Institute of Hydrodynamics, pp 21-22, Prague.
49. Canham, HJS, Catchpole, JP, and Long, RF, (1971). Boundary layer additives to reduce ship resistance. The Naval Architect, July 1971, pp 187-213.
50. Kowalski, T, (1998). Practical applications of dilute polymer additives for water craft. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Sea water Drag Reduction, pp 289-293, Newport.
51. American Standard for Testing and Materials (2000), Standard test method for measurement of bamacle adhesion strength in shear, D5618-94.
52. Terlizzi, A, Conte, E, Zupo, V, and Mazzella, L, (2000). Biological succession on silicone finding-release surfaces: long-term exposure tests in the harbour of Ischia, Italy. Biofouling, Vol 15, pp 327-342.
53. Denny, M, (1989). A limpet shell shape that reduces drag: laboratory demonstration of a lrydrodynamic meclianism andan explanation of its effectiveness in nature, Canadian Journal of Zoology, Vol 67, pp 2098-2106.
54. Walderhaug, H, (1986). Paint roughness effects on skin friction. International Shipbuilding Progress, Vol. 33, pp. 96-100.
55. White, FM, (1994). Fluid Mechanics, 3rd Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York, 736pp.
56. Manen, JDv, and Oossanen, Pv, (1988). Resistance. In: Principles of Naval Architecture, Second Revision, EV Lewis (Ed), SNAME, Vol 2, Chapter 5, p 58.
57. th International Congress on Marine Corrosion and Fouling (to be published in a Supplement to Biofouling, February 2003), San Diego, 21-26 July 2002.
58. Morgenroth, E, and Wilderer, PA, (2000). Influence of detachment mechanisms on competition in biofilms, Water Research, Vol 34, pp 417-426.
59. van Loosdrecht, MCM, Eikelboom, D, Gjaltema, A, Mulder, A, Tijhuis, L, and Heijnen, JJ, (1995), Biofilm structures, Water Science Technology, Vol 32, No 8, pp 35-43. (Pubitemid 26095883)
60. Klijnstra, JW, Overbeke, K, Sonke, H, Head, R, and Ferrari, GM, (2002). Critical speeds for fouling removal from a silicone coating. 11th International Congress on Marine Corrosion and Fouling, San Diego, 21-26 July 2002.
61. th International Congress on Marine Corrosion and Fouling, San Diego, 21-26 July 2002.