The effect of the neonatal Continuous Negative Extrathoracic Pressure (CNEP) trial enquiries on research in the UK

Archives of Disease in Childhood

Volumn 96, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 500-504

  Modi, Neena ^a   McIntosh, Neil ^b  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CLINICAL RESEARCH; CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); CONTRACT; DRUG INDUSTRY; DRUG MANUFACTURE; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; FUNDING; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HOSPITAL DEPARTMENT; HOSPITAL POLICY; HUMAN; LICENCE; MEDICAL AUDIT; MEDICAL ETHICS; MOTIVATION; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; NETHERLANDS; NEWBORN; PATIENT SAFETY; PATIENT TRANSPORT; POLITICAL SYSTEM; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; REFUSAL TO PARTICIPATE; RESEARCH ETHICS; RESEARCH SUBJECT; REVIEW; UNITED KINGDOM;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; INFANT, PREMATURE; RESPIRATION, ARTIFICIAL; RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME, NEWBORN; VENTILATORS, NEGATIVE-PRESSURE;

EID: 79956293734     PISSN: 00039888     EISSN: 14682044     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/adc.2010.188243     Document Type: Review

References (35)

1. Department of Health Research Governance Framework for Health and Social Care 2001, 2nd edition April 2005; updated annex September 2008.
2. Department of Health (Research and Development Directorate) Best Research for Best Health: A New National Health Research Strategy 25 January 2006 http://www.dh.gov. uk/prod-consum-dh/groups/dh-digitalassets/@ dh/@en/documents/digitalasset/dh-4127152.pdf (accessed 9 October 2010).
3. Ramsay S. UK inquiry highlights urgent need for "research governance". Lancet 2000;355:1706.
4. Department of Health Report of a review of the research framework in North Staffordshire Hospital NHS Trust executive summary of the report and recommendations 22 August 2003 http://www.dh.gov.uk/dr-consum-dh/groups/dh- digitalassets/@dh/@en/documents/digitalasset/ dh-4014542.pdf (accessed 9 October 2010).
5. Stephenson T. Investigating allegations of research misconduct. Worst outcome of Griffiths report would be that research becomes increasingly difficult. BMJ 2000;321:1345;author reply 1348-9.
6. Al-Shahi Salman R, Brock TM, Dennis MS, et al. Research governance impediments to clinical trials: a retrospective survey. J R Soc Med 2007;100:101-4. (Pubitemid 46383920)
7. Hackshaw A, Farrant H, Bulley S, et al. Setting up non-commercial clinical trials takes too long in the UK: findings from a prospective study. J R Soc Med 2008;101:299-304.
8. Haynes R, Bowman L, Rahimi K, et al. How the NHS research governance procedures could be modified to greatly strengthen clinical research. Clin Med 2010;10:127-9.
9. Stewart PM, Stears A, Tomlinson JW, et al. Regulation-the real threat to clinical research. BMJ 2008;337:a1732.
10. Sheard L, Tompkins CN, Wright NM, et al. Non-commercial clinical trials of a medicinal product: can they survive the current process of research approvals in the UK? J Med Ethics 2006;32:430-4.
11. Thompson AG, France EF. One stop or full stop? The continuing challenges for researchers despite the new streamlined NHS research governance process. BMC Health Serv Res 2010;10:124.
12. Carr R, Brocklehurst P, Doré CJ, et al. Granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor administered as prophylaxis for reduction of sepsis in extremely preterm, small for gestational age neonates (the PROGRAMS trial): a single-blind, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2009;373:226-33.
13. Reaping the rewards: a vision for UK medical science Academy of Medical Sciences, 10 Carlton House Terrace London SW1Y 5AH, Jan 2010. www.acmedsci.ac.uk
14. Snowdon C, Elbourne D, Garcia J. Declining enrolment in a clinical trial and injurious misconceptions: is there a flipside to the therapeutic misconception? Clin Ethics 2007;2:193-200.
15. Griffiths R. On drinking from a poisoned chalice. BMJ 2008;337:a2347.
16. Grifffiths R. CNEP and research governance. Lancet 2006;367:1037-8.
17. Hey E, Chalmers I. Mis-investigating alleged research misconduct can cause widespread, unpredictable damage. J R Soc Med 2010;103:133-8.
18. Gornall J. The role of the media in the Stoke CNEP saga. J R Soc Med 2010;103:173-7.
19. Griffiths R. The Stoke CNEP Saga-the Government enquiry in retrospect. J R Soc Med 2010;103:226-30.
20. Wright T. The Stoke CNEP Saga-how it damaged all involved. J R Soc Med 2010;103:277-82.
21. Catto G. The Stoke CNEP saga-a view from the General Medical Council. J R Soc Med 2010;103:313-6.
22. Wells F. The Stoke CNEP saga-did it need to take so long? J R Soc Med 2010;103:352-6.
23. National Institute for Health Research implementation plans; Implementation plan 4 http://www.nihr.ac.uk/about/Pages/about-implementation- plans.aspx (accessed 8 October 2010).
24. Department of Health, Liberating the NHS: Report of the arms-length bodies review. 26 July 2010 http://www.dh.gov.uk/prod-consum-dh/groups/dh- digitalassets/@dh/@en/@ps/documents/ digitalasset/dh-118053.pdf (accessed 14 October 2010).
25. NRES Mission Statement, National Patient Safety Agency, National Research Ethics Service Year in Review 2008-09, http://www.nres.npsa.nhs. uk http://www.nres.npsa.nhs.uk/news-and-publications/ publications/general- publications/ (accessed 9 October 2010).
26. Samuels MP, Raine J, Wright T, et al. Continuous negative extrathoracic pressure in neonatal respiratory failure. Pediatrics 1996;98:1154-60. (Pubitemid 26399282)
27. Gornall J. Three doctors and a GMC prosecution. BMJ 2008;337:a907.
28. Mellor P. Investigating allegations of research misconduct. Nothing but the truth must emerge from these investigations. BMJ 2000;321:1347; author reply 1348-9.
29. Dyer C. Southall cleared of conducting trial without parents' consent. BMJ 2008;337:a707.
30. White C, Freeth R. Woman at centre of Southall case faces prison sentence. BMJ 2002;324:693.
31. Hey E, Chalmers I. Investigating allegations of research misconduct: the vital need for due process. BMJ 2000;321:752-5.
32. Whitelaw A. Collapse of GMC hearing into research misconduct. Lancet 2008;372:1283-4.
33. Dyer C. Child abuse experts are "astonished" that convicted doctors' critic is in guidance group. BMJ 2010;341:c3788.
34. Freer Y, McIntosh N, Teunisse S, et al. More information, less understanding: a randomized study on consent issues in neonatal research. Pediatrics 2009;123:1301-5.
35. Saugstad OD. Room air resuscitation-two decades of neonatal research. Early Hum Dev 2005;81:111-16. (Pubitemid 40221988)