Investigating allegations of research misconduct

BMJ

Volumn 321, Issue 7272, 2000, Pages 1345-

  Stephenson, Terence ^a   Henshall, Carl ^b   Henshall, Deborah ^b   Wilkinson, Andrew ^c   Rennie, Janet ^c   Wright, Teresa ^d   Lucking, Kate ^d   Hall, David ^e   Mellor, Penny ^f   Morgan, Brian ^f   Hey, Edmund ^g   Chalmers, Iain ^h  

^a NOTTINGHAM UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^b Newcastle under Lyme   (United Kingdom)

^c British Association of Perinatal Medicine   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF NORTH STAFFORDSHIRE   (United Kingdom)

^e ROYAL COLLEGE OF PAEDIATRICS AND CHILD HEALTH   (United Kingdom)

^f UK Cochrane Centre ^*  (United Kingdom)

^g University in Newcastle upon Tyne   (United Kingdom)

^h UK COCHRANE CENTRE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BRAIN INJURY; CHILD CARE; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; INFORMED CONSENT; LETTER; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL RESEARCH; METHODOLOGY; PEER REVIEW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SAFETY; WELFARE;

EID: 0034715930     PISSN: 09598138     EISSN: 14685833     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.321.7272.1345     Document Type: Letter

References (33)

1. Hey E, Chalmers I. Investigating allegations of research misconduct: the vital need for due process (with commentary by R Griffiths, TE Stacey, J Struthers). BMJ 2000; 321: 752–756. (23 September.)
2. Aynsley-Green A, Barker M, Burr S, Macfarlane A, Morgan J, Sibert J, et al. Who is speaking for children and adolescents and for their health at the policy level? BMJ 2000; 321: 229–232. (22 July.)
3. Department of Health. Research and development. Research governance framework for health and social care (draft) consultation paper. www.doh.gov.uk/research/announcements/researchgovernanceconsult.htm; accessed 15 November 2000.
4. Conroy S, McIntyre J, Choonara I, Stephenson TJ. Drug trials in children: problems and the way forward. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2000; 49: 93–97.
5. Anonymous. UK paediatric clinical research under threat. Arch Dis Child 1997; 76: 1–3.
6. Hey E, Chalmers I. Investigating allegations of research misconduct: the vital need for due process (with commentary by R Griffiths, TE Stacey, J Struthers). BMJ 2000; 321: 752–756. (23 September.)
7. Samuels MP, Raine J, Wright T, Alexander JA, Lockyer K, Spencer SA, et al. Continuous negative extrathoracic pressure in neonatal respiratory failure. Pediatrics 1996; 98: 1154–1160.
8. Palmer KS, Spencer SA, Wickramasinghe YA, Wright T, Southall DP, Rolfe P. Effects of positive and negative pressure ventilation on cerebral blood volume of newborn infants. Acta Paediatr 1995; 84: 132–139.
9. Raine J. Continuous negative extrathoracic pressure in the neonatal respiratory distress syndrome [MD thesis]. In: Manchester: John Rowlands University, 1993.
10. NHS Executive West Midlands Regional Office. Report of a review of the research framework in North Staffordshire Hospital NHS Trust (Griffiths report). In: Leeds: NHS Executive, 2000. (www.doh.gov.uk/wmro/northstaffs.htm, updated 8 May 2000.)
11. Hey E, Chalmers I. Investigating allegations of research misconduct: the vital need for due process (with commentary by R Griffiths, TE Stacey, J Struthers). BMJ 2000; 321: 752–756. (23 September.)
12. Smith R. Inquiring into inquiries. BMJ 2000; 321: 715–716. (23 September.)
13. Smith R. Babies and consent: yet another NHS scandal. BMJ 2000; 320: 1285–1286.
14. Samuels MP, Raine J, Wright T, Alexander JA, Lockyer K, Spencer SA, et al. Continuous negative extrathoracic pressure in neonatal respiratory failure. Pediatrics 1996; 98: 1154–1160.
15. NHS Executive West Midlands Regional Office. Report of a review of the research framework in North Staffordshire Hospital NHS Trust (Griffiths report). Leeds: NHS Executive, 2000. (www.doh.gov.uk/wmro/northstaffs.htm, updated 8 May 2000.)
16. Hey E, Chalmers I. Investigating allegations of research misconduct: the vital need for due process (with commentary by R Griffiths, TE Stacey, J Struthers). BMJ 2000; 321: 752–756. (23 September.)
17. Marcovitch H. Diagnose and be damned. BMJ 1999; 319: 1376. (20 November.)
18. Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health. http://www.rcpch.ac.uk/; accessed 15 November 2000.
19. Hey E, Chalmers I. Investigating allegations of research misconduct: the vital need for due process (with commentary by R Griffiths, TE Stacey, J Struthers). BMJ 2000; 321: 752–756. (23 September.)
20. Hey E, Chalmers I. The Griffiths inquiry into research in Stoke on Trent failed to use due process. Electronic response to: Investigating allegations of research misconduct. bmj.com 2000;321 (www.bmj.com/cgi/eletters/321/7263/752#EL58; accessed 15 November 2000).
21. Hey E, Chalmers I. Investigating allegations of research misconduct: the vital need for due process (with commentary by R Griffiths, TE Stacey, J Struthers). BMJ 2000; 321: 752–756. (23 September.)
22. Ho JJ, Subramaniam P, Henderson-Smart DJ, Davis PG. Continuous distending pressure for respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants (Cochrane review). In: Cochrane Library. Issue 4. Oxford: Update Software, 2000.
23. Rowlands I. Competence of the Griffiths review. Electronic response to: Investigating allegations of research misconduct. bmj.com 2000;321 (www.bmj.com/cgi/eletters/321/7263/752#EL38; accessed 15 November).
24. Marcovitch H. Diagnose and be damned. BMJ 1999; 319: 1376. (20 November.)
25. Henshall C, Henshall D. Investigating allegations of research misconduct. Electronic response to: Investigating allegations of research misconduct. 2000;321 (www.bmj.com/cgi/eletters/321/7263/752#EL1; accessed 15 November).
26. Samuels MP, Southall DP. Negative extrathoracic pressure in treatment of respiratory failure in infants and young children. BMJ 1989; 299: 1253–1257.
27. Smith R. Inquiring into inquiries. BMJ 2000; 321: 715–716. (23 September.)
28. Tarnow-Mordi W, Mitra A. Postnatal dexamethasone in preterm infants. BMJ 1999; 319: 1385–1386.
29. Laurance J. Top doctors hit back at “witch hunt” inquiries. Independent 2000 Sept 22: 10.
30. Griffiths R, Stacey T, Struthers J. Commentary: Response from members of the Griffiths inquiry. BMJ 2000; 321: 755–756. (23 September.)
31. North Staffordshire NHS Trust. Oral questions and answers. Hansard. 10 October 2000. Column 150.
32. Blackhurst D. Southall criticised by CNEP report author. Sentinel 2000 23 Sep: 9.
33. Begg C, Cho M, Eastwood C, Horton R, Moher D, Olkin I, et al. Improving the quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials. The CONSORT statement. JAMA 1996; 276: 637–639.