Liberal internationalism: From ideology to empirical theory – and back again

International Theory

Volumn 1, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 409-438

  Jahn, Beate ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

ideology; liberal internationalism; Locke; positivism

Indexed keywords

EID: 79956255050     PISSN: 17529719     EISSN: 17529727     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1752971909000141     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Althusser L. (1984), Essays on Ideology, London, UK: Verso.
2. Anderson M.S. (1961), Europe in the Eighteenth Century 1713–1783, London, UK: Longmans.
3. Armitage D. (2004), ‘John Locke, Carolina, and the “Two Treatise of Government” ’, Political Theory 32(5): 602–627.
4. Arneil B. (1996), John Locke and America. The Defence of English Colonialism, Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
5. Bacon F. (1996), Francis Bacon. A Critical Edition of the Major Works, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
6. Boucher D. (2006), ‘Property and propriety in international relations: the case of John Locke’, in B. Jahn (ed.), Classical Theory in International Relations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 156–177.
7. Castoriadis C. (1998), The Imaginary Institution of Society, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. Doyle M.W. (1997), Ways of War and Peace, New York, USA: W.W. Norton and Company.
9. Dunn J. (1969), The Political Thought of John Locke. A Historical Account of the Arguments of the ‘Two Treatise of Government’, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Freeden M. (1996), Ideologies and Political Theory. A Conceptual Approach, Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
11. Gramsci A. (1971), Selections from the Prison Notebooks, ed. by Q. Hoare and G.N. Smith, New York, USA: International Publishers.
12. Gray J. (1986), Liberalism, Minneapolis, USA: University of Minnesota Press.
13. Hoffmann S. (1995), ‘The crisis of liberal internationalism’, Foreign Policy 98: 159–177.
14. Ivison D. (2003), ‘Locke, liberalism and empire’, in P.R. Anstey (ed.), The Philosophy of John Locke: New Perspectives, London, UK: Routledge, pp. 86–105.
15. Jahn B. (2007a), ‘The tragedy of liberal diplomacy: democratization, intervention, statebuilding I’, Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 1(1): 88–106.
16. Jahn B. (2007b), ‘The tragedy of liberal diplomacy: democratization, intervention, statebuilding II’, Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 1(2): 211–229.
17. Laslett P. (1994), ‘Introduction’, in P. Laslett (ed.), John Locke, Two Treatise of Government, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–133.
18. Lebovics H. (1986), ‘The uses of America in Locke's second treatise of government’, Journal of the History of Ideas 47(4): 567–581.
19. Locke J. (1959), An Essay Concerning Human Understanding (2 Vols., collated and annotated by Alexander Campbell Fraser), New York, USA: Dover.
20. Locke J. (1994), Two Treatise of Government, ed. by P. Laslett, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21. Long D. (1995), ‘The Harvard School of liberal international theory: a case for closure’, Millennium 24(3): 489–505.
22. MacPherson C.B. (1962), The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism: Hobbes to Locke, Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
23. Mannheim K. (1960), Ideology and Utopia, London, UK: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
24. Marks R.B. (2007), The Origins of the Modern World. Fate and Fortune in the Rise of the West, Lanham, USA: Rowman and Littlefield.
25. Marx K., Engels F. (1970), The German Ideology, ed. by C.J. Arthur, London, UK: Lawrence and Wishart.
26. McNally D. (1988), Political Economy and the Rise of Capitalism. A Reinterpretation, Berkeley, USA: University of California Press.
27. Montesquieu C.L. de S. (1949), The Spirit of the Laws, New York, USA: Hafner.
28. Moravcsik A. (1992), ‘Liberalism and International Relations Theory’, Center for International Affairs, Harvard University, Working Paper 92-6.
29. Moravcsik A. (1993), ‘Preferences and power in the European community: a liberal intergovernmentalist approach’, Journal of Common Market Studies 31(4): 473–524.
30. Moravcsik A. (1997), ‘Taking preferences seriously: a liberal theory of international politics’, International Organization 51(4): 513–553.
31. Perelman M. (2000), The Invention of Capitalism. Classical Political Economy and the Secret History of Primitive Accumulation, Durham: Duke University Press.
32. Rapaczynski A. (1987), Nature and Politics: Liberalism in the Philosophies of Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau, Ithaca, USA: Cornell University Press.
33. Richardson J.L. (1997), ‘Contending liberalisms: past and present’, European Journal of International Relations 3(1): 5–33.
34. Richardson J.L. (2001), Contending Liberalisms in World Politics. Ideology and Power, Boulder, USA: Lynne Rienner.
35. Smith M.J. (1992), ‘Liberalism and international reform’, in T. Nardin and D. Mapel (eds), Traditions of International Ethics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 201–224.
36. Tuck R. (1999), The Rights of War and Peace. Political Thought and the International Order from Grotius to Kant, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
37. Tully J. (1982), A Discourse on Property. John Locke and his Adversaries, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38. Tully J. (1993), An Approach to Political Philosophy: Locke in Contexts, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39. Waltz K. (1979), Theory of International Politics, New York, USA: McGraw-Hill.
40. Ward L. (2006), ‘Locke on the moral basis of international relations’, American Journal of Political Science 50(3): 691–705.
41. Washbrook D. (1997), ‘From comparative sociology to global history: Britain and India in the pre-history of modernity’, Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient 40(4): 410–443.
42. Wokler R. (2006), ‘Ideology and the origins of social science’, in M. Goldie and R. Wokler (eds), The Cambridge History of Eighteenth-Century Political Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 688–709.
43. Wyatt-Walter A. (1996), ‘Adam Smith and the liberal tradition in international relations’, Review of International Studies 22: 5–28.
44. Zacher M.W., Matthew R.A. (1995), ‘Liberal international theory: common threads, divergent strands’, in C.W. Kegley Jr (ed.), Controversies in International Relations Theory. Realism and the Neoliberal Challenge, New York, USA: St. Martin's Press, pp. 107–150.