The subject of representation

Representation

Volumn 44, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 93-97

  Saward, Michael ^a  

^a OPEN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79956249532     PISSN: 00344893     EISSN: 17494001     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00344890802079433     Document Type: Editorial

References (11)

1. Dobson, Andrew. 1996. “Representative democracy and the environment.”. In Democracy and the Environment, Edited by:Lafferty, W. M, and Meadowcroft, J. Cheltenham, UK:Edward Elgar.
2. Dryzek, John S., 2006. Deliberative Global Politics, Cambridge:Polity Press.
3. Held, David. 1995. Democracy and the Global Order, Cambridge:Polity Press.
4. Lovenduski, Joni, and Norris, Pippa. 2003. Westminster women:the politics of presence. Political Studies, 51:84–102.
5. Mair, Peter. 2006. Ruling the void? The hollowing of western democracy. New Left Review, 42:22–51.
6. Mansbridge, Jane. 2003. Rethinking representation. American Political Science Review, 97(4):515–528.
7. Pitkin, Hanna F., 1967. The Concept of Representation, Berkeley, CA:University of California Press.
8. Saward, Michael. 2006. The representative claim. Contemporary Political Theory, 5(3):297–318.
9. Saward, Michael. 2008. Authorisation and authenticity:representation and the unelected. The Journal of Political Philosophy, forthcoming
10. Sawer, Marian. 2001. “Representing trees, acres, voters and non-voters:concepts of parliamentary representation in Australia.”. In Speaking for the People, Edited by:Sawer, M, and Zappala, G. 36–63. Melbourne:Melbourne University Press.
11. Van Biezen, Ingrid. 2003. The place of parties in contemporary democracies. West European Politics, 26(3):171–184.