Psychometric properties of the OLQ-13 scale to measure Sense of Coherence in a community-dwelling older population

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

Volumn 9, Issue , 2011, Pages

  Naaldenberg, Jenneken ^a   Tobi, Hilde ^a   van den Esker, Franciska ^a   Vaandrager, Lenneke ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

13 ITEM ORIENTATION TO LIFE QUESTIONNAIRE; AGED; AGING; ARTICLE; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; ELDERLY CARE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; MALE; MEASUREMENT; PSYCHOMETRY; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RELIABILITY; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; GERIATRIC ASSESSMENT; METHODOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL RATING SCALE; REPRODUCIBILITY; SELF CONCEPT; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; STATISTICS; VALIDATION STUDY;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; AGED; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; GERIATRIC ASSESSMENT; HUMANS; PSYCHIATRIC STATUS RATING SCALES; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SELF EFFICACY; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT;

EID: 79956216836     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14777525     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1477-7525-9-37     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Antonovsky A. Unraveling the mystery of health 1987, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
2. Antonovsky A. The structure and properties of the sense of coherence scale. Soc Sci Med 1993, 36:725-733. 10.1016/0277-9536(93)90033-Z, 8480217.
3. Antonovsky A. The salutogenic model as a theory to guide health promotion. Health Promot Int 1996, 11:11-18.
4. Eriksson M, Lindström B. Validity of Antonovsky's sense of coherence scale: a systematic review. J Epidemiol Community Health 2005, 59:460-466. 10.1136/jech.2003.018085, 1757043, 15911640.
5. Lindström B, Eriksson M. Salutogenesis. J Epidemiol Community Health 2005, 59:440-442. 10.1136/jech.2005.034777, 1757059, 15911636.
6. Eriksson M, Lindstrom B. A salutogenic interpretation of the Ottawa Charter. Health Promot Int 2008, 23:190-199. 10.1093/heapro/dan014, 18356285.
7. Eriksson M. Unravelling the mystery of salutogenesis, the evidence base of the salutogenic research as measured by Antonovski's Sense of Coherence scale. Helsinki: Folkhälsan Research Centre 2007,
8. Gana K. Is sense of coherence a mediator between adversity and psychological well-being in adults?. Stress and Health 2001, 17:77-83.
9. Frenz AW, Carey MP, Jorgensen RS. Psychometric evaluation of Antonovsky's Sense of Coherence Scale. Psychol Assess 1993, 5:145-153.
10. Feldt T, Leskinen E, Kinnunen U, Mauno S. Longitudinal factor analysis models in the assessment of the stability of sense of coherence. Pers and Individ Dif 2000, 28:239-257.
11. Larsson G, Kallenberg K. Dimensional analysis of sense of coherence using structural equation modelling. Eur J of Pers 1999, 13:51-61.
12. Germano D, Misajon R, Cummins RA. Quality of Life and Sense of Coherence in People with Arthritis. J Clin Psychol Med Settings 2001, 8:253-261.
13. Feldt T, Lintula H, Suominen S, Koskenvuo M, Vahtera J, Kivimäki M. Structural validity and temporal stability of the 13-item sense of coherence scale: Prospective evidence from the population-based HeSSup study. Qual Life Res 2007, 16:483-493. 10.1007/s11136-006-9130-z, 17091360.
14. Feldt T, Rasku A. The structure of Antonovsky's Orientation to Life Questionnaire. Pers Individ Dif 1998, 25:505-516.
15. Sandell R, Blomberg J, Lazar A. The factor structure of Antonovsky's sense of coherence scale in Swedish clinical and nonclinical samples. Pers Indvid Dif 1998, 24:701-711.
16. Naaldenberg J, Vaandrager L, Koelen M, Leeuwis C. Ageing populations'everyday life perspectives on healthy ageing, new insights for policy and strategies at the local level. Appl gerontology 2011,
17. Lezwijn J, Vaandrager L, Naaldenberg J, Wagemakers A, Koelen M, Van Woerkum C. Healthy ageing in a salutogenic way: building the HP 2.0 framework. Health Soc Care Com 2010,
18. Wiesmann U, Hannich HJ. A salutogenic view on subjective well-being in active elderly persons. Aging Ment Health 2008, 12:56-65. 10.1080/13607860701365998, 18297479.
19. Billings J, Hashem F. literature review Salutogenesis and the promotion of positive mental health in older people. Mental health and well-being in older people-making it happen; Madrid 2009, European Communities.
20. Forbes DA. Enhancing mastery and sense of coherence: Important determinants of health in older adults. Geriatr Nurs 2001, 22:29-32. 10.1067/mgn.2001.113532, 11223794.
21. Drageset J, Nygaard H, Eide G, Bondevik M, Nortvedt M, Natvig G. Sense of coherence as a resource in relation to health-related quality of life among mentally intact nursing home residents - a questionnaire study. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2008, 6:85. 10.1186/1477-7525-6-85, 2607268, 18940001.
22. de Vlaming R, Haveman-Nies A, van't Veer P, de Groot L. Evaluation design for a complex intervention program targeting loneliness in non-institutionalized elderly Dutch people. BMC Public Health 2010, 10:552. 10.1186/1471-2458-10-552, 2945949, 20836840.
23. Jellesma F, Meerum Terwogt M, Rieffe C. Nederlandstalige Sense of Coherence vragenlijst voor kinderen. [the Dutch sense of coherence questionaire for children]. Gedrag & Gezondheid [Behavior & Health] 2006, 34:18-26.
24. Allen SJ, Hubbard R. Regression equations for the latent roots of random data correlation matrices with unities on the diagonal. Multivariate Behav Res 1986, 21:393-398.
25. Garson D. Statnotes: Topics in Multivariate Analysis, Cluster analysis. Acces date 10-21-2010., http://faculty.chass.ncsu.edu/garson/pa765/statnote.htm
26. Coffey A, Atkinson P. Making sense of qualitative data: complementary research strategies 1996, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
27. Silverman D. Interpreting Qualitative Data Methods for Analyzing Talk Text and Interaction 2006, London: Sage Publications, Third.
28. Schumaker R, Lomax R. A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling 2004, New York: Taylor & Francis Group LLC.
29. Hittner JB. Factorial invariance of the 13-item sense of coherence scale across gender. J Health Psychol 2007, 12:273-280. 10.1177/1359105307074256, 17284491.
30. Bernabé E, Tsakos G, Watt R, Suominen-Taipale A, Uutela A, Vahtera J, Kivimäki M. Structure of the sense of coherence scale in a nationally representative sample: the Finnish Health 2000 survey. Qual Life Res 2009, 18:629-636. 10.1007/s11136-009-9469-z, 19326255.
31. Eriksson M, Lindstrom B, Lilja J. A sense of coherence and health, Salutogenesis in a societal context: Aland, a special case?. J Epidemiol Community Health 2007, 61:684-688. 10.1136/jech.2006.047498, 2652992, 17630366.
32. Flannery RB, Perry CJ, Penk WE, Flannery GJ. Validating Antonovsky's sense of Coherence scale. J Clin Psychol 1994, 50:575-577. 10.1002/1097-4679(199407)50:4<575::AID-JCLP2270500412>3.0.CO;2-8, 7983205.
33. Muller Y, Rothman S. Sense of coherence and employees' perceptions of helping and restraining factors in an organisation. SA J Industrial Psychol 2009, 35:89-98.
34. Blom EH, Serlachius E, Larsson JO, Theorell T, Ingvar M. Low Sense of Coherence (SOC) is a mirror of general anxiety and persistent depressive symptoms in adolescent girls - a cross-sectional study of a clinical and a non-clinical cohort. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2010, 8:58. 10.1186/1477-7525-8-58, 2906444, 20537185.
35. Harkness JA, Braun M, Edwards B, Johnson T, Lijberg L, Mohler P, Pennell B, Smith T. Survey methods in multinational, multiregional and multicultural contexts 2010, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
36. CBS statline. , http://statline.cbs.nl/StatWeb/publication/?DM=SLNL&PA=03759ned&D1=1-2&D2=125-128,l&D3=296-297,901&D4=20&HDR=T&STB=G2,G1,G3&VW=T] access date 18 April 2011
37. Olsson M, Gassne J, Hansson K. Do different scales measure the same construct? Three ense of Coherence scales. J Epidemiol Community Health 2009, 63:166-167.