Current use and barriers and facilitators for implementation of standardised measures in physical therapy in the Netherlands

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Volumn 12, Issue , 2011, Pages

  Swinkels, Raymond A H M ^a   Van Peppen, Roland P S ^b   Wittink, Harriet ^b   Custers, Jan W H ^c,d   Beurskens, Anna J H M ^a  

^a ZUYD UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^c AMSTERDAM UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Netherlands)

^d Royal Dutch Society for Physiotherapy   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; NETHERLANDS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PHYSIOTHERAPIST; PHYSIOTHERAPY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; SCORING SYSTEM; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; STANDARDIZATION; ADULT; ARTHROMETRY; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; DISABILITY; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; EXERCISE TEST; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH CARE SURVEY; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; INTERNET; INTERVIEW; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PAIN ASSESSMENT; QUESTIONNAIRE; REVIEW; STANDARD; WORKLOAD;

ADULT; ARTHROMETRY, ARTICULAR; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; DISABILITY EVALUATION; EFFICIENCY, ORGANIZATIONAL; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; EXERCISE TEST; FEMALE; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; HEALTH CARE SURVEYS; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HUMANS; INTERNET; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NETHERLANDS; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PHYSICAL THERAPY MODALITIES; PHYSICAL THERAPY SPECIALTY; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); QUESTIONNAIRES; WORKLOAD;

EID: 79956216411     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712474     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-106     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. AR Feinstein, Clinimetrics New Haven: Yale University Press 1987
2. Monitoring in chronic disease: a rational approach. P Glasziou L Irwig D Mant, BMJ 2005 330 644 8 10.1136/bmj.330.7492.644 15774996 (Pubitemid 40444763)
3. The use of outcome measures in physical medicine and rehabilitation within Europe. R Haigh A Tennant F Biering-Sorensen G Grimby C Marincek S Phillips H Ring L Tesio JL Thonnard, J Rehabil Med 2001 33 273 8 10.1080/165019701753236464 11766957 (Pubitemid 33103912)
4. Evidence-based practice: beliefs, attitudes, knowledge, and behaviors of physical therapists. DU Jette K Bacon C Batty M Carlson A Ferland RD Hemingway JC Hill L Ogilvie D Volk, Phys Ther 2003 83 786 805 12940766 (Pubitemid 37243538)
5. Multifaceted strategies may increase implementation of physiotherapy clinical guidelines: a systematic review. PJ van der Wees G Jamtvedt T Rebbeck RA de Bie J Dekker EJ Hendriks, Aust J Physiother 2008 54 233 41 19025503
6. Physiotherapy management of low back pain: does practice match the Dutch guidelines? IC Swinkels CH van Den Ende BW van den J Dekker RH Wimmers, Aust J Physiother 2005 51 35 41 10.1016/S0004-9514(05)70051-9 15748123 (Pubitemid 40392783)
7. Outcome measures in physiotherapy management of patients with stroke: a survey into self-reported use, and barriers to and facilitators for use. RP Van Peppen FJ Maissan FR Van Genderen DR Van NL van Meeteren, Physiother Res Int 2008 13 255 70 10.1002/pri.417 18972323
8. Het gebruik van meetinstrumenten in de fysiotherapiepraktijk: een positieve attitude, maar het gebruik valt tegen. MF Pisters C Leemrijse, Ned Tijdschr Fysioth 2007 117 175 80
9. Monitormoment: komt een vrouw bij de fysiotherapeut. CJM Schenkeveld, Fysiopraxis 2007 16 29
10. A qualitative application of the diffusion of innovations theory to examine determinants of guideline adherence among physical therapists. J Harting GM Rutten ST Rutten SP Kremers, Physical Therapy 2009 89 221 32 10.2522/ptj.20080185 19168713
11. Implementation of measurement instruments in physical therapist practice: development of a tailored strategy. JG Stevens AJ Beurskens, Phys Ther 2010 90 953 61 10.2522/ptj.20090105 20413576
12. Use of standardized outcome measures in physical therapist practice: perceptions and applications. DU Jette J Halbert C Iverson E Miceli P Shah, Phys Ther 2009 89 125 35 10.2522/ptj.20080234 19074618
13. Factors influencing the use of outcome measures for patients with low back pain: a survey of New Zealand physical therapists. JM Copeland WJ Taylor SG Dean, Phys Ther 2008 88 1492 505 10.2522/ptj.20080083 18849478
14. Promoting the use of measurement tools in practice: a mixed-methods study of the activities and experiences of physical therapist knowledge brokers. LM Rivard DJ Russell L Roxborough M Ketelaar DJ Bartlett P Rosenbaum, Phys Ther 2010 90 1580 90 10.2522/ptj.20090408 20813819
15. Using knowledge brokers to facilitate the uptake of pediatric measurement tools into clinical practice: a before-after intervention study. DJ Russell LM Rivard SD Walter PL Rosenbaum L Roxborough D Cameron J Darrah DJ Bartlett SE Hanna LM Avery, et al. Implement Sci 2010 5 92 10.1186/1748-5908-5-92 21092283
16. Use of outcome measures in physiotherapy practice in Ireland from 1998 to 2003 and comparison to canadian trends. EK Stokes D O'Neill, Physiother Can 2008 60 109 16 10.3138/physio.60.2.109 20145774
17. How far have we come since 1992? A comparative survey of physiotherapist's use of outcome measures. T Kay AM Myers M Huijbregts, Physiother Can 2001 2001 268 81
18. The challenge of moving evidence-based measures into clinical practice: lessons in knowledge translation. M Ketelaar DJ Russell JW Gorter, Phys Occup Ther Pediatr 2008 28 191 206 10.1080/01942630802192610 18846897
19. Effective implementation: A model. R Grol M Wensing, Improving patient care: the implementation of change in clinical practice London: Elsevier, Grol R, Wensing M, Eccles M, 2005
20. Gaps between knowing and doing: understanding and assessing the barriers to optimal health care. LJ Cochrane CA Olson S Murray M Dupuis T Tooman S Hayes, J Contin Educ Health Prof 2007 27 94 102 10.1002/chp.106 17576625
21. Monitoring the change: current trends in outcome measure usage in physiotherapy. D Abrams M Davidson J Harrick P Harcourt M Zylinski J Clancy, Man Ther 2006 11 46 53 10.1016/j.math.2005.02.003 15886046 (Pubitemid 43121507)
22. Monitoring in chronic disease: a rational approach. P Glasziou L Irwig D Mant, BMJ 2005 330 644 8 10.1136/bmj.330.7492.644 15774996 (Pubitemid 40444763)
23. Responsiveness of functional status in low back pain: a comparison of different instruments. AJHM Beurskens HCWd Vet A Koke, Pain 1996 65 71 6 10.1016/0304-3959(95)00149-2 8826492 (Pubitemid 26227690)
24. Development and initial validation of the back pain functional scale. PW Stratford JM Binkley DL Riddle, Spine 2000 25 2095 102 10.1097/00007632- 200008150-00015 10954642 (Pubitemid 30662963)
25. Assessing disability and change on individual patients: a report of a patient specific measure. PW Stratford C Gill MD Westaway J Binkley, Physiother Can 1995 47 263
26. The patient-specific functional scale: validation of its use in persons with neck dysfunction. MD Westaway PW Stratford JM Binkley, J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1998 27 331 8 9580892 (Pubitemid 28194475)
27. Outcome measures used in therapy departments in Scotland. R Chesson M Macleod S Massie, Physiotherapy 1996 82 673 9 10.1016/S0031-9406(05)66375-4 (Pubitemid 27007426)
28. International Classification of Functioning, Disabilities and Health Problems. World Health Organization, Geneva, World Health Organization 2001
29. Attitudes toward standardized data collection. L Russek M Wooden S Ekedahl A Bush, Phys Ther 1997 77 714 29 9225843 (Pubitemid 27342316)
30. Physiotherapy Registration System. RJ Kenens L Hingstman, Utrecht., NIVEL 2006