Outcome measures in physiotherapy management of patients with stroke: A survey into self-reported use, and barriers to and facilitators for use

Physiotherapy Research International

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 255-270

  Van Peppen, Roland P S ^a,b   Maissan, Francois J F ^a,b   Van Genderen, Frank R ^b   Van Dolder, Rob ^a,b   Van Meeteren, Nico L U ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^b UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c TNO   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Cerebrovascular disorders; Guideline; Outcome measures; Physiotherapy; Survey

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NETHERLANDS; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PHYSIOTHERAPY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PSYCHOMETRY; STANDARD; STATISTICS; STROKE; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADULT; FEMALE; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NETHERLANDS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PHYSICAL THERAPY (SPECIALTY); PHYSICAL THERAPY MODALITIES; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; PSYCHOMETRICS; STROKE;

EID: 58049192947     PISSN: 13582267     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pri.417     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Abrams D, Davidson M, Harrick J, Harcourt P, Zylinski M, Clancy J. Monitoring the change: current trends in outcome measure usage in physiotherapy. Manual Therapy 2006; 11 (1): 46-53.
2. Akinpelu AO, Eluchie NC. Familiarity with, knowledge, and utilization of standardized outcome measures among physiotherapists in Nigeria. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice 2006; 22 (2): 61-72.
3. Albaum G. The likert scale revisited: an alternate version. Journal of Market Research Society 1997; 39 (2): 331-342.
4. Australian Physiotherapy Association. APA position statement - clinical justification and outcome measures (Available at https://apa.advsol.com.au/staticcontent/staticpages/position_statements/ public/ClinicalJustification&Outcome%20Measures.pdf) (Accessed December 27, 2007).
5. Berg K, Wood-Dauphinee S, Williams JI. The balance scale: reliability assessment with elderly residents and patients with an acute stroke. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 1995; 27 (1): 27-36.
6. Chesson R, Macleod M, Massie S. Outcome measures used in therapy departments in Scotland. Physiotherapy 1996; 82 (12): 673-679.
7. Collin C, Wade DT, Davies S, Horne V. The barthel ADL index: a reliability study. International Disability Studies 1988; 10 (2): 61-63.
8. Commissie CVA-Revalidatie. Rehabilitation After a Stroke, Guidelines and Recommendations for Health Care Professionals (in Dutch: Revalidatie na een beroerte: richtlijnen en aanbevelingen voor zorgverleners). Den Haag: Dutch Heart Foundation (in Dutch: Nederlandse Hartstichting), 2001.
9. Demeurisse G, Demol O, Robaye E. Motor evaluation in vascular hemiplegia. European Neurology 1980; 19 (6): 382-389.
10. Duckworth M. Outcome measurement selection and typology. Physiotherapy 1999; 85 (1): 21-27.
11. Field AP. Discovering Statistics using SPSS, Second Edition. London: SAGE Publications Ltd., 2005.
12. Franchignoni FP, Tesio L, Ricupero C, Martino MT. Trunk control test as an early predictor of stroke rehabilitation outcome. Stroke 1997; 28 (7): 1382-1385.
13. Geyh S, Cieza A, Schouten J, Dickson H, Frommelt P, Omar Z, Kostanjsek N, Ring H, Stucki G. ICF core sets for stroke. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 2004; 44 Suppl: 135-141.
14. Glasziou P, Irwig L, Mant D. Monitoring in chronic disease: a rational approach. British Medical Journal 2005; 330 (7492): 644-648.
15. Grol R, Grimshaw J. From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients' care. Lancet 2003; 362 (9391): 1225-1230.
16. Grol R, Wensing M, Eccles M. Improving Patient Care. The Implementation of Change in Clinical Practice. London: Elsevier Butterworth Heinemann, 2005.
17. Haigh R, Tennant A, Biering-Sorensen F, Grimby G, Marincek C, Phillips S, Ring H, Tesio L, Thonnard JL. The use of outcome measures in physical medicine and rehabilitation within Europe. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 2001; 33 (6): 273-278.
18. Hammond R. Evaluation of physiotherapy by measuring outcome. Physiotherapy 2000; 86 (4): 170-172.
19. Heller A, Wade DT, Wood VA, Sunderland A, Hewer RL, Ward E. Arm function after stroke: measurement and recovery over the first three months. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 1987; 50 (6): 714-719.
20. Holden MK, Gill KM, Magliozzi MR. Gait assessment for neurologically impaired patients. Standards for outcome assessment. Physical Therapy 1986; 66: 1530-1539.
21. Jette AM. Assessing disability in studies on physical activity. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2003; 25 (3) Suppl 2: 122-128.
22. Jette DU, Bacon K, Batty C, Carlson M, Ferland A, Hemingway RD, Hill JC, Ogilvie L, Volk D. Evidence-based practice: beliefs, attitudes, knowledge, and behaviors of physical therapists. Physical Therapy 2003; 83 (9): 786-805.
23. Kenens RJ, Hingstman L. Cijfers uit de registratie van fysiotherapeuten, peiling 1 Januari 2005. Utrecht: NIVEL, 2006.
24. Learner J, Goodman NW. Descriptions of correlation. Lancet 1996; 348 (9021): 199-200.
25. Lennon S. Physiotherapy practice in stroke rehabilitation: a survey. Disability and Rehabilitation 2003; 25 (9): 455-461.
26. Maher C, Williams M. Factors influencing the use of outcome measures in physiotherapy management of lung transplant patients in Australia and New Zealand. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice 2005; 21 (4): 201-217.
27. Nakayama H, Jorgensen HS, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS. Recovery of upper extremity function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen stroke study. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1994; 75 (4): 394-398.
28. Parker-Taillon D. CPA initiatives put the spotlight on evidence-based practice in physiotherapy. Physiotherapy Canada 2002; 24: 12-15.
29. Partridge CJ. The outcome of physiotherapy and its measurement. Physiotherapy 1982; 68 (11): 362-363.
30. Peters MAJ, Harmsen M, Laurant MGH, Wensing M. Room for Improvement? Barriers to and Opportunities for Improvement of Patient Care (in Dutch: Ruimte voor verandering? Knelpunten en mogelijkheden voor verbeteringen in de patientenzorg). Nijmegen, The Netherlands: Radbout University Medical Centre, 2003.
31. Pollock AS, Legg L, Langhorne P, Sellars C. Barriers to achieving evidence-based stroke rehabilitation. Clinical Rehabilitation 2000; 14 (6): 611-617.
32. Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to Practice, 2nd Edition. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 2000.
33. Rothstein JM, Echternach JL, Riddle DL. The Hypothesis-Oriented Algorithm for Clinicians II (HOAC II): a guide for patient management. Physical Therapy 2003; 83 (5): 455-470.
34. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use, Second Edition. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.
35. Turner-Stokes L, Turner-Stokes T. The use of standardized outcome measures in rehabilitation centres in the UK. Clinical Rehabilitation 1997; 11 (4): 306-313.
36. Van Peppen RPS, Hendriks HJM, Van Meeteren NLU, Helders PJM, Kwakkel G. The development of a clinical practice stroke guideline for physiotherapists in The Netherlands: a systematic review of available evidence. Disability and Rehabilitation 2007; 29 (10): 767-783.
37. Van Peppen RPS, Kwakkel G, Harmeling BC, Kollen BJ, Hobbelen JSM, Buurke JH, Halfens JHC, Wagenborg L, Vogel MJ, Berns M, Van Klaveren R, Hendriks HJM, Dekker J. KNGF Clinical Practice Guideline for Physical Therapy in patients with Stroke (in Dutch: KNGF-richtlijn Beroerte). Supplement to the Dutch Journal of Physical Therapy 2004; 114 (5): 3-248. September 2004, English version: April 2008.
38. Vugts CJ, Van der Velden LFJ, Hingstman L, Van der Velde F, Van der Windt W. Behoefteraming Fysiotherapeuten 2002-2015. Utrecht: NIVEL/ Prismant, 2003.
39. Wade DT. Measurements in Neurological Rehabilitation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992.
40. WHO. International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health. Geneve: ICF-introduction, 2001.