-
1
-
-
33644873415
-
Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia in labour
-
Issue 4, Art No.: CD000332; DOI:
-
Anim-Somuah M, Smyth R, Howell CJ. Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005; Issue 4, Art No.: CD000332; DOI:
-
(2005)
Cochrane Database Syst Rev
-
-
Anim-Somuah, M.1
Smyth, R.2
Howell, C.J.3
-
3
-
-
0032866213
-
A survey of epidural analgesia for labour in the United Kingdom
-
Burnstein R, Buckland R, Pickett J. A survey of epidural analgesia for labour in the United Kingdom. Anaesthesia 1999;54: 634-640.
-
(1999)
Anaesthesia
, vol.54
, pp. 634-640
-
-
Burnstein, R.1
Buckland, R.2
Pickett, J.3
-
4
-
-
0032583533
-
Effect of epidural vs parenteral opioid analgesia on the progress of labor
-
Halpern S, Leighton B, Ohlsson A, et al. Effect of epidural vs parenteral opioid analgesia on the progress of labor. JAMA 1998;280:2105-2110.
-
(1998)
JAMA
, vol.280
, pp. 2105-2110
-
-
Halpern, S.1
Leighton, B.2
Ohlsson, A.3
-
5
-
-
0036187331
-
Cesarean delivery, a randomized trial of epidural analgesia versus intravenous meperidine analgesia during labor in nulliparous women
-
Sharma S, Alexander J, Messick G, et al. Cesarean delivery, a randomized trial of epidural analgesia versus intravenous meperidine analgesia during labor in nulliparous women. Anesthesiology 2002;96:546-551.
-
(2002)
Anesthesiology
, vol.96
, pp. 546-551
-
-
Sharma, S.1
Alexander, J.2
Messick, G.3
-
6
-
-
0035822273
-
Effect of low-dose mobile versus traditional epidural techniques on mode of delivery: A randomised controlled trial
-
Comparative Obstetric Mobile Epidural Trial (COMET) Study Group UK,
-
Comparative Obstetric Mobile Epidural Trial (COMET) Study Group UK. Effect of low-dose mobile versus traditional epidural techniques on mode of delivery: A randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2001;358:19-23.
-
(2001)
Lancet
, vol.358
, pp. 19-23
-
-
-
7
-
-
18744386100
-
Randomized controlled trial comparing traditional with two "mobile" epidural techniques; anesthetic and analgesic efficacy
-
Comparative Obstetric Mobile Epidural Trial (COMET) Study Group UK,
-
Comparative Obstetric Mobile Epidural Trial (COMET) Study Group UK. Randomized controlled trial comparing traditional with two "mobile" epidural techniques; anesthetic and analgesic efficacy. Anesthesiology 2002;97:1567-1575.
-
(2002)
Anesthesiology
, vol.97
, pp. 1567-1575
-
-
-
8
-
-
0025334717
-
Epidural anaesthesia and long term backache after childbirth
-
MacArthur C, Lewis M, Knox E, Crawford J. Epidural anaesthesia and long term backache after childbirth. BMJ 1990;301:9-12.
-
(1990)
BMJ
, vol.301
, pp. 9-12
-
-
MacArthur, C.1
Lewis, M.2
Knox, E.3
Crawford, J.4
-
9
-
-
0027269528
-
Assessing long term backache after childbirth
-
Russell R, Groves P, Taub N, et al. Assessing long term backache after childbirth. BMJ 1993;306:1299-1303.
-
(1993)
BMJ
, vol.306
, pp. 1299-1303
-
-
Russell, R.1
Groves, P.2
Taub, N.3
-
11
-
-
13344292248
-
Natural history of post partum back pain and its relationship with epidural anesthesia
-
Groves P, Breen T, Ransil B, Oriol N. Natural history of post partum back pain and its relationship with epidural anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1994;81:A1167.
-
(1994)
Anesthesiology
, vol.81
-
-
Groves, P.1
Breen, T.2
Ransil, B.3
Oriol, N.4
-
13
-
-
0028820722
-
Epidural anaesthesia and low back pain after delivery: A prospective cohort study
-
Macarthur A, Macarthur C, Weeks S. Epidural anaesthesia and low back pain after delivery: A prospective cohort study. BMJ 1995;311:1336-1339.
-
(1995)
BMJ
, vol.311
, pp. 1336-1339
-
-
Macarthur, A.1
Macarthur, C.2
Weeks, S.3
-
14
-
-
0029931101
-
Long term backache after childbirth: Prospective search for causative factors
-
Russell R, Dundas R, Reynolds F. Long term backache after childbirth: Prospective search for causative factors. BMJ 1996;312:1384-1388.
-
(1996)
BMJ
, vol.312
, pp. 1384-1388
-
-
Russell, R.1
Dundas, R.2
Reynolds, F.3
-
15
-
-
84937104952
-
Long term follow up of patients who received 10,098 spinal anesthetics
-
Vandam LD, Dripps RD. Long term follow up of patients who received 10, 098 spinal anesthetics. JAMA 1956;161:586-591.
-
(1956)
JAMA
, vol.161
, pp. 586-591
-
-
Vandam, L.D.1
Dripps, R.D.2
-
18
-
-
0028962194
-
Postnatal maternal morbidity: Extent, causes, prevention and treatment
-
Glazener CM, Abdalla M, Stroud P, et al. Postnatal maternal morbidity: Extent, causes, prevention and treatment. BJOG 1995;102:282-287.
-
(1995)
BJOG
, vol.102
, pp. 282-287
-
-
Glazener, C.M.1
Abdalla, M.2
Stroud, P.3
-
20
-
-
79956202215
-
-
® for Windows Version 16. St Andrew's House, UK: SPSS Ltd
-
® for Windows Version 16. St Andrew's House, UK: SPSS Ltd, 2008.
-
(2008)
-
-
-
21
-
-
0037125645
-
Randomised study of long term outcome after epidural versus non-epidural analgesia during labour
-
Howell C, Dean T, Lucking L, et al. Randomised study of long term outcome after epidural versus non-epidural analgesia during labour. BMJ 2002;325:357-359.
-
(2002)
BMJ
, vol.325
, pp. 357-359
-
-
Howell, C.1
Dean, T.2
Lucking, L.3
-
22
-
-
0036038175
-
Epidural analgesia and backache: A randomized controlled comparison with intramuscular meperidine for analgesia during labour
-
Loughman B, Carli F, Romney M, et al. Epidural analgesia and backache: A randomized controlled comparison with intramuscular meperidine for analgesia during labour. Br J Anaesth 2002; 89:466-472.
-
(2002)
Br J Anaesth
, vol.89
, pp. 466-472
-
-
Loughman, B.1
Carli, F.2
Romney, M.3
-
23
-
-
84871884933
-
Combined spinal-epidural versus epidural analgesia in labour
-
Issue 4, Art. No.: CD003401; DOI: 10-1002/14651858.CD003301.
-
Hughes D, Simmons SW, Brown J, Cyna AM. Combined spinal-epidural versus epidural analgesia in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003; Issue 4, Art. No.: CD003401; DOI: 10-1002/14651858.CD003301.
-
(2003)
Cochrane Database Syst Rev
-
-
Hughes, D.1
Simmons, S.W.2
Brown, J.3
Cyna, A.M.4
-
24
-
-
24344472287
-
Faecal incontinence and mode of first and subsequent delivery: A six-year longitudinal study
-
MacArthur C, Glazener C, Lancashire R, et al. Faecal incontinence and mode of first and subsequent delivery: A six-year longitudinal study. BJOG 2005;112:1075-1082.
-
(2005)
BJOG
, vol.112
, pp. 1075-1082
-
-
MacArthur, C.1
Glazener, C.2
Lancashire, R.3
-
25
-
-
0345549598
-
Urinary incontinence in the 12-month postpartum period
-
Burgio KL, Zyczynski H, Locher J, et al. Urinary incontinence in the 12-month postpartum period. Obstet Gynecol 2003;102: 1291-1298.
-
(2003)
Obstet Gynecol
, vol.102
, pp. 1291-1298
-
-
Burgio, K.L.1
Zyczynski, H.2
Locher, J.3
-
26
-
-
33644998806
-
Persistent urinary incontinence and delivery mode history: A six-year longitudinal study
-
MacArthur C, Glazener CMA, Wilson PD, et al. Persistent urinary incontinence and delivery mode history: A six-year longitudinal study. BJOG 2006;113:218-224.
-
(2006)
BJOG
, vol.113
, pp. 218-224
-
-
MacArthur, C.1
Glazener, C.M.A.2
Wilson, P.D.3
|