Tsunami run-up height forecasting by using artificial neural networks

Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 165-181

  Günaydin, Kemal ^a   Günaydin, Ayten ^a  

^a ESKISEHIR OSMANGAZI UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Artificial neural networks; Earthquake; Run up height; Tsunami

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; CALIFORNIA; EARTHQUAKE SOURCE; FEED-FORWARD BACK PROPAGATION; FORECASTING PERFORMANCE; GROUND MOTIONS; INPUT LAYERS; MOMENT MAGNITUDES; REGRESSION NEURAL NETWORKS; RUN-UP HEIGHT; RUN-UP HEIGHTS; WASHINGTON;

EARTHQUAKES; FORECASTING; MODEL STRUCTURES; TSUNAMIS;

NEURAL NETWORKS;

ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; EARTHQUAKE MAGNITUDE; SEISMIC MOMENT; TSUNAMI; WAVE HEIGHT; WAVE RUNUP;

CALIFORNIA; OREGON; UNITED STATES; WASHINGTON [UNITED STATES];

EID: 79956205356     PISSN: 10286608     EISSN: 10290249     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10286608.2010.526703     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Altun, F., Kişi, Ö., Aydin, K., 2008. Predicting the compressive strength of steel fiber added lightweight concrete using neural network. Computational Materials Science, 42 (2), 259-265.
2. Andrade, C., Borges, P., Freitas, M.C., 2006. Historical tsunami in the Azores archipelago (Portugal). Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 156 (1-2), 172-185.
3. Atwater, B.F., 1987. Evidence for Holocene earthquakes along the auter coast of Washington state. Science, 236 (4804), 942-944.
4. Atwater, B.F., Hemphill-Haley, E., 1997. Recurrence intervals for great earthquakes of the past 3,500 years at northeastern Willapa Bay, Washington (USGS Professional Paper 1576). Reston, VA: United States Geological Survey.
5. Atwater, B.F., et al., 1995. Summary of geologic evidence for past great earthquakes at the Cascadia subduction zone. Earthquake Spectra, 11 (1), 1-18.
6. Barman, R., et al., 2006. Tsunami travel time prediction using neural networks. Geophysical Research Letters, 33 (16),L16612 (6 pages).
7. Beltrami, G.M, 2008. An ANN algorithm for automatic, real-time tsunami detection in deep-sea level measurements. Ocean Engineering, 35 (5-6), 572-587.
8. Bishop, C.M., Hinton, G., 1995. Neural networks for pattern recognition. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
9. Briggs, et al., 1995. Large scale three dimensional experiments of tsunami indundation. In:Y. Tsuchiya and N. Shuto, eds. Tsunami: progress in prediction, disaster prevention and warning. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publisher, 129-149.
10. Bryant, E., 2008. Tsunami: the underrated hazard. 2nd ed. New York: Springer.
11. Carrier, G.F., Wu, T.T., andYeh, H., 2003. Tsunami run-up and draw-down on a plane beach. Journal of Fluid Mechanics,475, 79-99.
12. Casey, K., Lim, A., Dozier, G., 2006. Evolving general regression neural networks for tsunami detection and response. In: Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE congress on evolutionary computations, Vancouver, Canada, 2451-2458.
13. Chatterjee, A., 2000. An introduction to the proper orthogonal decomposition. Current Science, 78 (7), 808-817.
14. Dao, M.H., Tkalich, P., and Chan, E.S., 2008. Tsunami forecasting using proper orthogonal decomposition method. Journal of Geophysical Research, 113, C06019(17 pages), doi:10.1029/2007JC004583.
15. Dawson, A.G. and Stewart, I., 2007. Tsunami deposits in the geological record. Sedimentary Geology, 200 (3-4), 166-183.
16. De Lange, W.P. and Healy, T.R., 2001. Tsunami hazard for the Auckland region and Hauraki Gulf, New Zealand. NaturalHazards, 24 (3), 267-284.
17. Fuhrman, D.R. and Madsen, P.A., 2008. Simulation of nonlinear wave run-up with a high-order Boussinesq model. Coastal Engineering, 55 (2), 139-154.
18. Geist, E., 2005. Local tsunami hazards in the Pacific Northwest from Cascadia subduction zone earthquakes (USGS professional paper 1661-B). Reston, VA: US Geological Survey.
19. Ghosh, A.K., 2008. Assessment of earthquake-induced tsunami hazard at a power plant site. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 238 (7), 1743-1749.
20. Grilli, S.T., et al., 1994. Shoaling of solitary waves on plane beaches. Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal and Ocean Engineering, 120 (6), 609-628.
21. Haykin, S., 1999. Neural networks: a comprehensive foundation. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
22. Hsiao, S.C., et al., 2008. On the evolution and run-up of breaking solitary waves on a mild sloping beach. Coastal Engineering, 55 (12), 975-988.
23. Holder, L., 1985. Multiple regression in hydrology. Wallingford: Institute of Hydrology.
24. Hughes, S.A., 2004. Estimation of wave run-up on smooth, impermeable slopes using the wave momentum flux parameter. Coastal Engineering, 51 (11-12), 1085-1104.
25. Johnston, D., et al., 2005. Measuring tsunami preparedness in coastal Washington, United States. Natural Hazards, 35 (1), 173-184.
26. Kalra, R., et al., 2005. RBF network for spatial mapping of wave heights. Marine Structures, 18 (3), 289-300.
27. Kanoglu, U., 2004. Nonlinear evolution and runup-rundown of long waves over a sloping beach. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 513, 363-372.
28. Kanoglu, U. and Synolakis, C.E., 1998. Long wave runup on piecewise linear topographies. Journal of Fluid Mechanics,374, 1-28.
29. Karunanithi, N., et al., 1994. Neural network for river flow prediction. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 8 (2), 201-219.
30. Kim, D.H., Cho, Y.S., and Yi, Y.K., 2007. Propagation and run-up of nearshore tsunamis with HLLC approximate Riemann solver. Ocean Engineering, 34 (8-9), 1164-1173.
31. Kim, B., et al., 2004. Prediction of plasma etching using a randomized generalized regression neural network. Vacuum, 76 (1), 37-43.
32. Levenberg, K., 1944. A method for the solution of certain problems in least squares. Quarterly of Applied Mathematics, 2 (2), 164-168.
33. Li, Y. and Raichlen, F., 2001. Solitary wave runup on plane slopes. Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal and Ocean Engineering, 127 (1), 33-44.
34. Li, Y. and Raichlen, F., 2002. Non-breaking and breaking solitary wave run-up. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 456, 295-318.
35. Lin, P., Chang, K.-A., and Liu, P.L.-F., 1999. Run-up and run-down of solitary waves on sloping beaches. Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal and Ocean Engineering, 125 (5), 247-255.
36. Liu, P.L.-F., et al., 2005. Observations by the International Tsunami Survey Team in Sri Lanka. Science, 308 (5728), 1595.
37. Liu, P.L.-F., Wang, X., and Salisbury A.J., 2009. Tsunami hazard and early warning system in South China Sea. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 36 (1), 2-12.
38. Madsen, P.A. and Fuhrman, D.R., 2008. Run-up of tsunamis and long waves in terms of surf-similarity. Coastal Engineering, 55 (3), 209-223.
39. Maiti, S. and Sen, D., 1999. Computation of solitary waves during propagation and runup on a slope. Ocean Engineering, 26 (11), 1063-1083.
40. Marquardt, D., 1963.An algorithm for least-squares estimation of nonlinear parameters. Journal of Applied Mathematics, 11 (2), 431-441.
41. Nadaraya, E.A., 1964. On estimating regression. Theory of Probability and its Applications, 9 (1), 141-142.
42. Namekar, S., Yamazaki, Y., and Cheung, K.F., 2009. Neural network for tsunami and runup forecast. Geophysical Research Letters, 36, L08604(6 pages), doi:10.1029/2009GL037184.
43. Nelson, A.R., et al., 2008. Great-earthquake paleogeodesy and tsunamis of the past 2000 years at Alsea Bay, central Oregon coast, USA. Quaternary Science Reviews, 27 (7-8), 747-768.
44. Panizzo, A. and Briganti, R., 2007. Analysis of wave transmission behind low-crested breakwaters using neural networks. Coastal Engineering, 54 (9), 643-656.
45. Parzen, E., 1962. On estimation of a probability density function and mode. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 33(3), 1065-1076.
46. Pelinovsky, E., et al., 1999. Runup of tsunami waves on a vertical wall in a basin of complex topography. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth Part B-Hydrology Oceans and Atmosphere, 24 (5), 431-436.
47. Priest, G., 1995. Explanation of mapping methods and use of the tsunami hazard maps of the Oregon coast (DOGAMI open-file report O-95-67). Portland, OR: Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries.
48. Priest, G., et al., 2001. Tsunami hazard assessment in Oregon. In: Proceedings of the International Tsunami Symposium, National Tsunami Hazard Mitigation Program Review, Seattle, Washington, 55-65.
49. Principe, J.C., Euliano, N.R., and Lefebvre, W.C., 1999. Neural and adaptive systems: fundamentals through simulation. NewYork: Wiley.
50. Romano, M., et al., 2009. Artificial neural network for tsunami forecasting. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 36 (1),29-37.
51. Rumelhard, D.E., Hinton, G.E., and Williams, R.J., 1986. Learning internal representation by error backpropagation, parallel distributed processing: explorations microstructure of cognition, vol. 1. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
52. Sanchez, A. and Cheung, K.F., 2007. Tsunami forecast using an adaptive inverse algorithm for the Peru-Chile source region. Geophysical Research Letters, 34 (13), L13605(6 pages), doi:10.1029/2007GL030158.
53. Schiøler, H. and Hartmann, U., 1992. Mapping neural network derived from the Parzen window estimator. Neural Networks, 5 (6), 903-909.
54. Sharda, R., 1994. Neural networks for the MS/OR analyst: An application bibliography. Interfaces, 24 (2), 116-130.
55. Specht, D.F., 1991. A general regression neural network. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 2 (6), 568-576.
56. Srivichai, M., Supharatid, S., and Imamura, F., 2006. Developing of forecasted tsunami database along Thailand Andaman coastline. Proceeding, Asia Oceania Geosciences Society 3rd Annual Meeting, Singapore, 138.
57. Synolakis, C.E., 1987. The runup of solitary waves. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 185, 523-545.
58. Synolakis, C.E., et al., 2008. Validation and verification of tsunami numerical models. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 165 (11-12), 2197-2228.
59. Tadepalli, S. and Synolakis, C.E., 1994. The run-up of N-waves on sloping beaches. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A- Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences, 445 (1923), 99-112.
60. Titov, V.V. and Synolakis, C.E., 1998. Numerical modeling of tidal wave runup. Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal and Ocean Engineering, 124 (4), 157-171.
61. Titov, V.V., et al., 2005. Real-time tsunami forecasting: challenges and solutions. Natural Hazards, 35 (1), 41-58.
62. Tomandl, D. and Schober, A., 2001.A modified general regression neural network (MGRNN) with new, efficient training algorithms as a robust 'black box'-tool for data analysis. Neural Networks, 14 (8), 1023-1034.
63. Ward, S.N., 2001. Landslide tsunami. Journal of Geophysical Research, 106 (B6), 11201-11215.
64. Ward, S.N., 2002. Tsunamis. In: R.A. Meyers, ed. Encyclopedia of physical science and technology, vol. 17. New York: Academic Press, 175-191.
65. Watson, G.S., 1964. Smooth regression analysis. Sankhya, Series A, 26 (4), 359-372.
66. Wei, Y., et al., 2003. Inverse algorithm for tsunami forecasts. Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal and Ocean Engineering,129 (2), 60-69.
67. Widrow, B., Rumelhart, D.E., and Lehr, M.A., 1994. Neural networks: applications in industry, business and science. Communications of the ACM, 37 (3), 93-105.
68. Wood, N., 2007. Variations in community exposure and sensitivity to tsunami hazards in Oregon (USGS scientific investigations report 2007-5283). Reston, VA: United States Geological Survey.
69. Wood, N. and Good, J., 2005. Perceptions of earthquake and tsunami issues in US Pacific Northwest port and harbor communities. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 23 (3), 103-138.
70. Wood, N. and Soulard, C., 2008. Variations in community exposure and sensitivity to tsunami hazards on the open-ocean and Strait of Juan de Fuca coasts of Washington (USGS scientific investigations report 2008-5004). Reston, VA: United States Geological Survey.
71. Wu, J.K., 1994. Neural networks and simulation methods. New York: Marcel Dekker.
72. Yamazaki, Y., et al., 2006. Forecast of tsunamis from the Japan-Kuril-Kamchatka source region. Natural Hazards, 38 (3), 411-435.
73. Zelt, J.A., 1991. The run-up of nonbreaking and breaking solitary waves. Coastal Engineering, 15 (3), 205-246.
74. Zhang, G., Patuwo, B.E., and Hu, M.Y., 1998. Forecasting with artificial neural networks: the state of the art. International Journal of Forecasting, 14 (1), 35-62.