Optimal response-adaptive allocation designs in phase III clinical trials: Incorporating ethics in optimality

Statistics and Probability Letters

Volumn 81, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 1155-1160

  Biswas, Atanu ^a   Bhattacharya, Rahul ^b  

^a INDIAN STATISTICAL INSTITUTE   (India)

^b WEST BENGAL STATE UNIVERSITY   (India)

Author keywords

Ethics; Optimality; Response adaptive allocation

Indexed keywords

EID: 79956192791     PISSN: 01677152     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.spl.2011.03.011     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Biswas A., Bhattacharya R. Optimal response-adaptive designs for normal responses. Biometrical Journal 2009, 51:193-202.
2. Biswas A., Bhattacharya R. An Optimal response-adaptive design with dual constraints. Statistics and Probability Letters 2010, 80:177-185.
3. Biswas A., Mandal S. Optimal adaptive designs in phase III clinical trials for continuous responses with covariates. MODa 7-Advances in Model-Oriented Design and Analysis 2004, 51-58. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg. A. Bucchianico, H. Lauter, H.P. Wynn (Eds.).
4. Hu F., Rosenberger W.F. The Theory of Response-Adaptive Randomization in Clinical Trials 2006, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
5. Kumar S., Jain S. Treatment of appendiceal mass: prospective, randomized clinical trial. Indian Journal of Gastroenterology 2004, 23:165-167.
6. Rosenberger W.F., Stallard N., Ivanova A., Harper C., Ricks M. Optimal adaptive designs for binary response trials. Biometrics 2001, 57:173-177.
7. Zhang L., Rosenberger W.F. Response-adaptive randomization for clinical trials with continuous outcomes. Biometrics 2006, 62:562-569.