Context, cultural bias, and health risk perception: The "Everyday" nature of pesticide policy preferences in London, Calgary, and Halifax

Risk Analysis

Volumn 31, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 847-865

  Hirsch, Rachel A ^a   Baxter, Jamie ^b  

^a YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Cultural theory; Lawn aesthetics; Pesticide policy preference; Risk perception

Indexed keywords

ALBERTA; BELIEF SYSTEMS; CALGARY; CHEMICAL PESTICIDES; CULTURAL BIAS; CULTURAL THEORY; HALIFAX; LAWN AESTHETICS; LOGISTIC REGRESSIONS; NOVA SCOTIA; ONTARIO; POLICY MAKING; RELATIVE IMPORTANCE; RISK FACTORS; SOCIAL FACTOR;

HEALTH; PESTICIDES; RISK ANALYSIS; RISK PERCEPTION;

HEALTH RISKS;

PESTICIDE;

DECISION MAKING; ESTHETICS; HEALTH RISK; LOGISTICS; PERCEPTION; PESTICIDE; PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSE; QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

ARTICLE; CANADA; CULTURAL FACTOR; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; HUMAN; RISK ASSESSMENT;

ALBERTA; CULTURAL CHARACTERISTICS; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; HUMANS; NOVA SCOTIA; ONTARIO; PESTICIDES; RISK ASSESSMENT;

CANADA;

EID: 79956153044     PISSN: 02724332     EISSN: 15396924     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01560.x     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Health Canada. Pest Management Regulatory Agency, 2009. Available at:, Accessed on May 19, 2009.
2. Health Canada. Re-evaluation Decision: (2, 4-Dichlorophenoxy) Acetic Acid [2, 4-D], 2008. Available at:, Accessed on February 11, 2010.
3. Government of Alberta: Environment. Alberta Bans Fertilizer-Herbicide Combination Products, 2010. Available at:, Accessed on February 10, 2010.
4. Pralle S. The "mouse that roared": Agenda setting in Canadian pesticides politics. Policy Studies Journal, 2006; 34(2):171-194.
5. Town of Hudson. Operational Bylaw N. 270: Concerning Pesticides, 1991. Available at:, Accessed on November 04, 2010.
6. Supreme Court of Canada. 114957 Canada Ltée (Spraytech, Société d'arrosage) v. Hudson (Town), 2001. Available at:, Accessed on May 19, 2009.
7. City of Halifax. Halifax Regional Municipality Bylaw P-800 Respecting the Regulation of Pesticides, Herbicides and Insecticides, 2000. Available at:, Accessed on May 19, 2009.
8. Christie M. Private Property Pesticide Bylaws in Canada, Population Statistics by Municipality, April 15 2009. Available at:, Accessed on February 10, 2010.
9. Government of Quebec. Pesticides Management Code, 2003. Available at:, Accessed on May 19, 2009.
10. Legislative Assembly of Ontario. Bill 64, Cosmetic Pesticides Ban Act, 2008. Available at:, Accessed on May 19, 2009.
11. Hirsch RA, Baxter J, Brown C. The importance of skillful community leaders: Understanding municipal pesticide policy change in Calgary and Halifax. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 2010; 53(6):743-757.
12. City of Calgary. Pesticide Bylaw: Introduction, 2009. Available at:, Accessed on February 10, 2010.
13. City of Calgary. Integrated Pest Management Plan, 1998. Available at:, Accessed on May 19, 2009.
14. Sandberg L, Foster J. Challenging lawn and order: Environmental discourse and lawn reform in Canada. Environmental Politics, 2005; 14(4):478-494.
15. Slovic P. Trust, emotion, sex, politics, and science: Surveying the risk-assessment battlefield. Risk Analysis, 1999; 19(4):689-701.
16. Krewski D, Lemyre L, Turner MC, Lee JEC, Dallaire C, Bouchard L, Brand K, Mercier P. Public perception of population health risks in Canada: Health hazards and sources of information. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 2006; 12:626-644.
17. Robbins P, Sharp JT. Producing and consuming chemicals: The moral economy of the American lawn. Economic Geography, 2003; 79(4):425-451.
18. Coppin DM, Eisenhauer BW, Krannich RS. Is pesticide use socially acceptable? A comparison between urban and rural settings. Social Science Quarterly, 2002; 83(1):379-394.
19. Hirsch R, Baxter J. The look of the lawn: Pesticide policy preference and health-risk perception in context. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 2009; 27:468-490.
20. City of Calgary. Integrated Pest Management, 2009. Available at:, Accessed on May 19, 2009.
21. Douglas M, Wildavsky A. Risk and Culture: An Essay on the Selection of Technical and Environmental Dangers. Los Angeles, CA University of California Press, 1982.
22. City of London. Bylaw to Regulate the Use of Pesticides: PH-14, 2006. Available at:, Accessed on May 19, 2009.
23. Statistics Canada. Community Profiles, Catalog Number 92-591-XWE, 2006. Available at:, Accessed on May 19, 2009.
24. Fischhoff B, Slovic P, Lichtenstein S. How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits. Policy Sciences, 1978; 9:127-152.
25. Boholm A. Comparative studies of risk perception: A review of twenty years of research. Journal of Risk Research, 1998; 1(2):135-163.
26. Sjöberg L. The methodology of risk perception research. Quality & Quantity, 2000; 34:407-418.
27. Slovic P. The Perception of Risk. London, UK Earthscan, 2000.
28. Siegrist M, Keller C, Kiers HAL. A new look at the psychometric paradigm of perception of hazards. Risk Analysis, 2005; 25(1):211-222.
29. Lloyd AJ. The extent of patients' understanding of the risk of treatments. Quality in Health Care, 2001; 10(I)::i14-i18.
30. Sjöberg L. Political decisions and public risk perception. Reliability Engineering and Systems Safety, 2001; 72:115-123.
31. Boholm A. The cultural nature of risk: Can there be an anthropology of uncertainty? Ethos, 2003; 68(2):159-178.
32. Litmanen T. Cultural approach to the perception of risk: Analyzing concern about the siting of a high-level nuclear waste facility in Finland. Waste Management Research, 1999; 17:212-219.
33. Sjöberg L. A discussion of the limitations of the psychometric and cultural theory approaches to risk perception. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 1996; 68(3(4):219-225.
34. Marris C, Langford IH, O'Riordan T. A quantitative test of the cultural theory of risk perceptions: Comparison with the psychometric paradigm. Risk Analysis, 1998; 18(5):635-647.
35. Flynn J, Slovic P, Mertz CK. Gender, race, and perception of environmental health risks. Risk Analysis, 1994; 14(6):1101-1108.
36. Brenot J, Bonnefous S, Marris C. Testing cultural theory of risk in France. Risk Analysis, 1998; 18(6):729-739.
37. Sjöberg L. Explaining risk perception: An empirical evaluation of cultural theory. Risk Decision and Policy, 1997; 2(2):113-130.
38. Douglas M. Being fair to hierarchists. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 2003; 151(4):1349-1370.
39. Lima ML, Castro P. Cultural theory meets the community: Worldviews and local issues. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2005; 25:23-35.
40. Tansey J, O'Riordan T. Cultural theory and risk: A review. Health, Risk and Society, 1999; 1(1):71-90.
41. Tansey J. Risk as politics, culture as power. Journal of Risk Research, 2004; 1:17-32.
42. O'Connor RE, Bord RJ, Fisher A. Rating threat mitigators: Faith in experts, governments, and individuals themselves to create a safer world. Risk Analysis, 1998; 18(5):547-556.
43. Peters E, Slovic, P. The role of affect and worldviews as orienting dispositions in the perception and acceptance of nuclear power. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1996; 26(16):1427-1453.
44. Dake K. Myths of nature: Culture and the social construction of risk. Journal of Social Issues, 1992; 48(4):21-37.
45. Fath BD, Beck MB. Elucidating public perceptions of environmental behavior: A case study of Lake Lanier. Environmental Modeling & Software, 2005; 20:485-498.
46. Boholm A. Risk perception and social anthropology: Critique of cultural theory. Ethos, 1996; 61(1-2):64-84.
47. Rippl S. Cultural theory and risk perception: A proposal for a better measurement. Journal of Risk Research, 2002; 5(2):147-165.
48. Sjöberg L. Distal factors in risk perception. Journal of Risk Research, 2003; 6(3):187-211.
49. Poortinga W, Steg L, Vlek C. Environmental risk concern and preferences for energy-saving measures. Environment and Behavior, 2002; 34(4):455-478.
50. Steg L, Sievers I. Cultural theory and individual perceptions of environmental risks. Environment and Behavior, 2000; 32(2):250-269.
51. Brenot J, Bonnefous S, Mays C. Cultural theory and risk perception: Validity and utility explored in the French context. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 1996; 68(3-4):239-243.
52. Carlisle J, Smith E. Postmaterialism vs. egalitarianism as predictors of energy-related attitudes. Environmental Politics, 2005; 14(4):527-540.
53. Meader N, Uzzell D, Gatersleben B. Cultural theory and quality of life. Revue européenne de psychologie appliquée, 2006; 56:61-69.
54. Mamadouh V. Grid-group cultural theory: An introduction. GeoJournal, 1999; 47:395-409.
55. Till KE. Political landscapes. In Duncan JS, Johnson NC, Schein RH (eds). A Companion to Cultural Geography. Malden, MA Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2004.
56. Feagan RB, Ripmeester M. Contesting natural(ized) lawns: A geography of private green space in the Niagara Region. Urban Geography, 1999; 20(7):617-634.
57. Feagan R, Ripmeester M. Reading private green space: Competing geographic identities at the level of the lawn. Philosophy & Geography, 2001; 4(1):79-95.
58. Kearns A, Parkinson M. The significance of neighborhood. Urban Studies, 2001; 38(12):2103-2110.
59. Coppin D, Eisenhauer B, Krannich R. Is pesticide use socially acceptable? A comparison between urban and rural settings. Social Science Quarterly, 2002; 83(1):379-394.
60. Jenkins V. The Lawn: A History of an American Obsession. Washington, DC Smithsonian Institution Press, 1994.
61. Starr C. Social benefit versus technological risk. Science, 1969; 165(3899):1232-1238.
62. Public Health Agency of Canada. West Nile Virus Monitor, 2008. Available at:, Accessed on May 19, 2009.
63. Finucane ML, Alhakami A, Slovic P, Johnson SM. The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 2000; 13(1):1-17.
64. Grendstad G. Grid-group theory and political orientations: Effects of cultural bias in Norway in the 1990s. Scandinavian Political Studies, 2000; 23(3):217-244.
65. Peters E, Slovic P. The role of affect and worldviews as orienting dispositions in the perception and acceptance of nuclear power. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1996; 26(16), 1427-1453.
66. Manski CF. Identification problems in the social sciences. Sociological Methodology, 1993; 23:1-56.
67. Statistics Canada. Community Profiles, Catalog Number 93F0053XIE, 2001. Available at:, Accessed on May 19, 2009.
68. Wrigley N. Categorical Data Analysis for Geographers and Environmental Scientists. New York Longman, 1985.
69. Crichton N. Information point: Odds rations. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 2001; 10(2):268-269.
70. Hirsch RA. Pesticide policy preference and risk perception: A case comparison in the neighbourhood context [dissertation]. [ London ( ON )]: University of Western Ontario; 2010.
71. Baxter J, Lee D. Understanding expressed low concern and latent concern near a hazardous waste treatment facility. Journal of Risk Research, 2004; 7(7(8):705-729.
72. Sjöberg L. Risk perception by the public and experts: A dilemma in risk management. Human Ecology Review, 1999; 6(2):1-9.
73. Knight AJ, Warland R. Determinants of food safety risks: A multi-disciplinary approach. Rural Sociology, 2005; 70(2):253-275.
74. Wildavsky A, Dake K. Theories of risk perception: Who fears what and why? Daedalus, 1990; 119(4):41-60.
75. Baxter J, Eyles J, Elliott S. From siting principles to siting practices: A case study of discord among trust, equity and community participation. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 1999; 42(4):501-525.
76. Oberholzer-Gee F, Bohnet I, Frey BS. Fairness and competence in democratic decisions. Public Choice, 1997; 91:89-105.
77. Baxter J, Eyles J, Elliott S. "Something happened": The relevance of the risk society for describing the siting process for a municipal landfill. Geografiska Annaler, 1999; 18:91-109.