From siting principles to siting practices: A case study of discord among trust, equity and community participation

Journal of Environmental Planning and Management

Volumn 42, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 501-525

  Baxter, Jamie W ^a   Eyles, John D ^b   Elliott, Susan J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^b MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HAZARDOUS WASTE; LAND USE PLANNING; LOCAL PARTICIPATION; WASTE FACILITY; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; LANDFILL; METHODOLOGY; PARTICIPATORY APPROACH;

CANADA;

EID: 0033367114     PISSN: 09640568     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09640569911037     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Albrecht, S. Amey, R. & Sarit, A. (1996) The siting of radioactive waste facilities: what are the effects on communities?, Policy Studies Journal, 61(4), pp. 649-673.
2. Armour, A. (1992) The co-operative process: facility siting the democratic way, Plan Canada, March, pp. 29-34.
3. Arnstein, S. (1969) A ladder of citizen participation, Journal of the American Institution of Planners, 35, pp. 216-224.
4. Bailey, C., Faupel, C. & Holland, S, (1992) Hazardous wastes and differing perceptions of risk in Sumpter county, Alabama, Society & Natural Resources, 5, pp. 21-36.
5. Barber, B. (1983) The Logic and Limits of Trust (New Brunswick, NJ, Rutgers University Press).
6. Baxter, J. (1997) Exploring the meaning of risk and uncertainty in an environmentally sensitized community, PhD dissertation (Hamilton, Ontario, McMaster University, Department of Geography).
7. Baxter, J. & Eyles, J. (1997) Evaluating qualitative research in social geography: establishing 'rigour' in interview analysis, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 22(4), pp. 505-525.
8. Baxter, J. & Eyles, J. (1999) The utility of in-depth interviews for studying the meaning of environmental risk, Professional Geographer, 51(2), pp. 307-320.
9. Beck, U. (1992) Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity (Newbury Park, CA, Sage).
10. Bord, R. & O'Connor, R. (1992) Determinants of risk perceptions of a hazardous waste site, Risk Analysis, 12(3), pp. 411-416.
11. Bowen, W., Sailing, M., Haynes, K. & Cyran, E. (1995) Toward environmental justice: spatial equity in Ohio and Cleveland, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 85(4), pp. 641-63.
12. Bullard, R. (1990) Dumping in Dixie: Race, Class, and Environmental Quality (Boulder, CO, Westview).
13. Covello, V. (1996) Risk Perception and Communication: Tools and Techniques for Communicating Risk Information (New York, Columbia University Centre for Risk Communication).
14. Cutter, S. (1995) Race, class and environmental justice, Progress in Human Geography, 19(1), pp. 111-122.
15. Daniels, S., Lawrence, R. & Alig, R. (1996) Decision-making and ecosystem-based management: applying the Vroom-Yetton model to public participation strategy, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 16, pp. 13-30.
16. Denzin, N. & Lincoln, Y. (1994) Handbook of Qualitative Research (Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage).
17. Edelstein, M. (1988) Contaminated Communities: The Social and Psychological Impacts of Residential Toxic Exposure (Boulder, CO, Westview).
18. Elliott, S.J. (1998) A comparative analysis of public concern over solid waste incinerators, Waste Management & Research, 14(2), 16(4), pp. 351-364.
19. Elliott, S., Taylor, S.M., Walter, S., Stieb, D., Frank, J. & Eyles, J. (1993) Modeling, psychosocial effects of exposure to solid waste facilities, Social Science & Medicine, 37(6), pp. 791-804.
20. Eyles, J., Taylor, S.M., Johnson, N. & Baxter, J. (1993) Worrying about waste: living close to solid waste disposal facilities in Southern Ontario, Social Science & Medicine, 37(6), pp. 805-812.
21. Flynn, J., Burns, W., Mertz, C. & Slovic, P. (1992) Trust as a determinant of opposition to a high-level radioactive waste repository, analysis of a structural model, Risk Analysis, 12(3), pp. 417-429.
22. Frantzis, I. (1993) Methodology for municipal landfill sites selection, Waste Management & Research, 11, pp. 441-451.
23. Furuseth, O. (1990) Impacts of a sanitary landfill: spatial and non-spatial effects on the surrounding community, Journal of Environmental Management, 31, pp. 269-277.
24. Greenberg, M. & Anderson, R. (1984) Hazardous Waste Sites: The Credibility Gap (New Brunswick, NJ Center for Urban Policy Research).
25. Groothuis, P. & Miller, G. (1997) The role of social distrust in risk-benefit analysis: a study of the siting of a hazardous waste disposal facility, Journal of Risk & Uncertainty, 15, pp. 241-257.
26. Hadden, S. (1991) Public perception of hazardous waste, Risk Analysis, 11(1), pp. 47-57.
27. Harvey, D. (1973) Social Justice and the City (Baltimore, MD, Johns Hopkins University Press).
28. Interim Waste Authority (1991) Draft Approach and Criteria (Toronto, Interim Waste Authority).
29. Johnson, B. & Covello, V. (1987) Social and Cultural Construction of Risk (Boston, Reidel).
30. Kasperson, R., Golding, D. & Tuler, S. (1992) Siting hazardous facilities and communicating risks under conditions of high social distrust, Journal of Social Issues, 48, pp. 161-167.
31. Krimsky, S. & Golding, D. (1992) Social Theories of Risk (Westport, CN, Praeger).
32. Kunreuther, H., Fitzgerald, K. & Aarts, T. (1993) Siting noxious facilities: a test of the facility siting credo, Risk Analysis, 13(3), pp. 301-315.
33. Laird, F. (1989) The decline of deference: The political context of risk communication, Risk Analysis, 9(4), pp. 543-50.
34. Lawrence, D. (1996) Approaches and methods of siting locally unwanted waste facilities, Journal of Environmental Planning & Management, 39(2), pp. 165-187.
35. Laws, D. (1996) The practice of fairness, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 16, pp. 65-70.
36. Leiss, W. (1996) Three phases in the evolution of risk communication practice, The Annals of the American Academy of Political & Social Science, May, pp. 116-125.
37. Lincoln, Y. & Guba, E. (1985) Naturalistic Inquiry (Beverly Hills, CA, Sage).
38. Lober, D. (1993) Beyond self-interest: a model of public attitudes towards waste facility siting, Journal of Environmental Planning & Management, 36(3), pp. 345-363.
39. Lober, D. (1995) Why protest?: public behavioral and attitudinal response to siting a waste disposal facility, Policy Studies Journal, 23(3), pp. 499-518.
40. Miles, M. & Huberman M. (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods, (Beverley Hills, CA, Sage).
41. Mitchell, R. & Carson R. (1986) Property rights, protest, and the siting of hazardous waste facilities, AMEA Papers & Proceedings, 76(2), pp. 285-290.
42. Mohai, P. & Bryant, B. (1992) Race and the Incidence of Environmental Hazards (Boulder, CO, Westview).
43. Murphree, D., Wright, S. & Ebaugh, H. (1996) Toxic waste siting and community resistance: how cooptation of local citizen opposition failed, Sociological Perspectives, 39(4), pp. 447-463.
44. Noble, G. (1992) Siting Landfills and Other LULUs (Lancaster, Technomic).
45. O'Hare, M. (1977) "Not on my block you don't": facility siting and the strategic importance of compensation, Public Policy, 25(4), pp. 471-487.
46. Perrow, C. (1984) Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies (New York, Basic Books).
47. Petts, J. (1994) Effective waste management: understanding and dealing with public concerns, Waste Management & Research, 12, pp. 207-222.
48. Petts, J. (1995) Waste management strategy development: a case study of community involvement and consensus-building in Hampshire, Journal of Environmental Planning & Management, 38(4), pp. 519-536.
49. Portney, K. (1991) Siting Hazardous Waste Treatment Facilities: The NIMBY Syndrome (New Nork, Auburn House).
50. Rabe, B. (1992) When siting works, Canada-style, Journal of Health Politics, Policy, & Law, 17(1), pp. 119-142.
51. Richards, L. & Richards, T. (1991) The NUDIST qualitative data analysis system, Qualitative Sociology, 14(4), pp. 307-324.
52. Ristoratore, M. (1985) Siting toxic waste disposal facilities in Canada and the United States: problems and prospects, Policy Studies Journal, 14(1), pp. 140-148.
53. Slovic, P., Flynn, J. & Gregory, R. (1994) Stigma happens: social problems in the siting of nuclear waste facilities, Risk Analysis, 14(5), pp. 773-777.
54. Takahashi, L. & Lord Gaber, S. (1998) Controversial facility siting in the urban environment: resident and planner perceptions in the United States, Environment & Behavior, 30(2), pp. 184-215.
55. United Church of Christ (1987) Toxic Wastes and Race in the United States: A National Report on the Racial and Socio-Economic Characteristics with Hazardous Waste Sites (New York, United Church of Christ Commission for Racial Justice).
56. United States Department of Environmental Protection (1979) Siting of Hazardous Waste Management Facilities and Public Opposition (Washington, DC, United States Government Printing Office).
57. Webler, T., Kastenholz, H. & Renn, O. (1995) Public participation in impact assessment: a social leaning perspective, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 15, pp. 443-463.
58. Zeiss, C. (1991) Community decision-making and impact management priorities for siting waste facilities, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 11, pp. 231-255.
59. Zeiss, C. & Lesfrud, L. (1996) Making or breaking waste facility siting successes with a siting framework, Environmental Management, 20(1), pp. 53-64.