Does Choice of College Textbook Make a Difference in Students' Comprehension?

College Teaching

Volumn 56, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 28-34

  Durwin, Cheryl Cisero ^a   Sherman, William M ^a  

^a SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

comprehension; student preferences; textbook selection

Indexed keywords

EID: 79956140953     PISSN: 87567555     EISSN: 19308299     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3200/CTCH.56.1.28-34     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Alexander, P. A., J. M. Kulikowich, and S. K. Schulze, 1994. The influence of topic knowledge, domain knowledge, and interest on the comprehension of scientific exposition. Learning and Individual Differences 6 (4): 379-97.
2. Anderson. R. C., 1982. Allocation of attention during reading. In Discourse processing, ed. A. Flammer and W. Kintsch, 292-305. New York: North-Holland.
3. Anderson. R. C., and J. W. Pichert, 1978. Recall of previously unrecallable information following a shift in perspective. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 17:1-12.
4. Anderson. R. C., J. W. Pichert, and L. L. Shirey, 1983. Effects of the reader's schema at different points in time. Journal of Educational Psychology 75:271-79.
5. Baillet, S. D., and J. M. Keenan, 1986. The role of encoding and retrieval processes in the recall of text. Discourse Processes 9:247-68.
6. Bamber, R. T., 1974. The impossible dream: How to out-science physics. Teaching of Psychology 1 (1): 28-29.
7. Beck, I. L., M. G. McKeown, and E. W. Gromoll, 1989. Learning from social studies texts. Cognition and Instruction 6:99-158.
8. Beck, I. L., M. G. McKeown, R. C. Omanson, and M. Pople, 1984. Improving the comprehensibility of stories: The effects of revisions that improve coherence. Reading Research Quarterly 19:263-77.
9. Beck, I. L., M. G. McKeown, G. M. Sinatra, and J. A. Loxterman, 1991. Revising social studies text from a text-processing perspective: Evidence of improved comprehensibility. Reading Research Quarterly 26:251-76.
10. Beck, I. L., M. G. McKeown, and J. Worthy, 1995. Giving a text voice can improve students' understanding. Reading Research Quarterly 30:220-38.
11. Beck, I. L., R. C. Omanson, and M. G. McKeown, 1982. An instructional redesign of reading lessons: Effects on comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly 17:462-81.
12. Borland, R. and A. Flammer, 1985. Encoding and retrieval processes in memory for prose. Discourse Processes 8:305-17.
13. Borland, R., A. Flammer, and A. J. Wearing, 1987. Text memory: Recalling twice, using different perspectives. European Journal of Psychology of Education 2:209-17.
14. Britton, B. K., L. Van Dusen, S. Gülgöz, S. M. Glynn, and L. Sharp, 1991. Accuracy of learnability judgments for instructional texts. Journal of Educational Psychology 83 (1): 43-47.
15. Brown, A. L., J. D. Bransford, R. A. Ferrera, and J. C. Campione, 1983. Learning, remembering, and understanding. In Carmichael's manual of child psychology, vol. 1, ed. J. H. Flavell and E. M. Markman, 77-166. New York: John Wiley.
16. Cernak, L. S., and F. I. M. Craik, 1979. Levels of processing in human memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
17. Davidson, A. and G. M. Green, eds. 1988. Linguistic complexity and text comprehension: Readability issues reconsidered. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. Davison, A. and R. Kantor, 1982. On the failure of readability formulas to define readable texts: A case study from adaptations. Reading Research Quarterly 17:187-209.
19. diSibio, M., 1982. Memory for connected discourse: A constructivist review. Review of Educational Research 52:149-74.
20. Duffy, T. M., L. Higgins, B. Mehlenbacher, C. Cochran, D. Wallace, C. Hill, D. Haugen, et al, 1989. Models for the design of instructional text. Reading Research Quarterly 24:434-57.
21. Duffy, T. M., and P. Kabance, 1982. Testing a readable writing approach to text revision. Journal of Educational Psychology 74:733-48.
22. Fernald, L. D., 1989. Tales in a textbook: Learning in the traditional and narrative modes. Teaching of Psychology 16 (3): 121-24.
23. Goetz, E. T., D. L. Schallert, R. E. Reynolds, and D. I. Radin, 1983. Reading in perspective: What real cops and pretend burglars look for in a story. Journal of Educational Psychology 75:500-10.
24. Gorenflo, D. W., and J. V. McConnell, 1991. The most frequently cited journal articles and authors in introductory psychology textbooks. Teaching of Psychology 18:8-12.
25. Grabe, M., 1979. Reader imposed structure and prose retention. Contemporary Educational Psychology 4:162-71.
26. Greisinger, W. S., and R. R. Klene, 1984. Readability of introductory psychology textbooks: Flesch versus student ratings. Teaching of Psychology 11 (2): 90-91.
27. Griggs, R. A., 1999. Introductory psychology textbooks: Assessing levels of difficulty. Teaching of Psychology 26:248-53.
28. Griggs, R. A., and P. Marek, 2001. Similarity of introductory psychology textbooks: Reality or illusion? Teaching of Psychology 28 (4): 254-56.
29. Haenggi, D., and C. A. Perfetti, 1994. Processing components of college-level reading comprehension. Discourse Processes 17 (1): 83-104.
30. Jackson, S. L., R. A. Griggs, C. S. Koenig, A. N. Christopher, and P. Marek, 2000. A compendium of introductory psychology texts: 1997-2000.http://www.lemoyne.edu/OTRP
31. Just, M. A., and P. A. Carpenter, 1992. A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review 99:122-49.
32. Kaakinen. J. K., J. Hyönä, and J. M. Keenan, 2001. Perspective effects on on-line text processing. Discourse Processes 33:159-73.
33. Kardash. C. A., J. M. Royer, and B. A. Greene, 1988. Effects of schemata on both encoding and retrieval of information from prose. Journal of Educational Psychology 80:324-29.
34. Kintsch, W., 1998. Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
35. Sources of coherence in reading Kintsch, W., and M. Franzke, 1995. The role of background knowledge in the recall of a news story. In, ed. R. F Lorch and E. J. O'Brien, 321-33. Hillsdale. NJ: Erlbaum.
36. Kintsch, W., and T. A. van Dijk, 1978. Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review 85:363-94.
37. Klare, G. R., 1985. How to write readable English. London: Hutchinson.
38. Marchant, H. M., J. M. Royer, and B. A. Greene, 1988. Superior reliability and validity for a new form of the Sentence Verification Technique for measuring comprehension. Educational and Psychological Measurement 48:827-34.
39. Marek, P., R. A. Griggs, and A. N. Christopher, 1999. Do college students' perceptions justify their prevalence? Teaching of Psychology 26 (1): 11-19.
40. McNamara, D. S., and W. Kintsch, 1996. Learning from texts: Effects of prior knowledge and text coherence. Discourse Processes 22:247-88.
41. Moravcsik, J. E., 1995. Writing quality, reading skills, and domain knowledge as factors in text comprehension. In Reading and language processing, ed. J. M. Henderson, M. Singer, and F. Ferreira. 232-46. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
42. Moravcsik, J. E., and W. Kintsch, 1993. Writing quality, reading skills, and domain knowledge as factors in text comprehension. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 47 (2): 360-74.
43. Nevid, J. S., 2002. Traditional versus modular format in presenting textual material in introductory psychology. Teaching of Psychology 29 (3): 237-38.
44. Olsen, L. A., and R. Johnson, 1989. A discourse-based approach to the assessment of readability. Linguistics and Education 1:207-31.
45. Ormrod, J. E., 2003. Educational psychology: Developing learners. 4th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
46. Perfetti, C. A., 1988. Verbal efficiency in reading ability. In Reading research: Advances in theory and practice, 6:109-43. New York: Academic.
47. Proctor, D. L., 2000. The language of introductory psychology. Poster session presented at the meeting of National Institute on the Teaching of Psychology, St. Petersburg Beach, FL.
48. Rasool, J. M., and J. M. Royer, 1986. Assessment of reading comprehension using the Sentence Verification Technique: Evidence from narrative and descriptive tests. Journal of Educational Research 79:180-84.
49. Reder, L. M., and J. R. Anderson, 1980. A comparison of texts and their summaries: Memorial consequences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 19:121-34.
50. Rothkopf, E. Z., and M. J. Billington, 1979. Goal-guided learning from text: Inferring a descriptive processing model from inspection times and eye movements. Journal of Educational Psychology 71:310-27.
51. Royer, J. M., W. A. Abranovic, and G. M. Sinatra, 1987. Using entering reading performance as a predictor of course performance in college classes. Journal of Educational Psychology 79:19-26.
52. Royer, J. M., M. S. Carlo, and C. A. Cisero, 1992. School-based uses for the Sentence Verification Technique for measuring listening and reading comprehension. Psychological Test Bulletin 5 (1): 5-19.
53. Royer, J. M., and D. J. Cunningham, 1981. On the theory and measurement or reading comprehension. Contemporary Educational Psychology 6:187-216.
54. Royer, J. M., C. N. Hastings, and C. Hook, 1979. A sentence verification technique for measuring reading comprehension. Journal of Reading Behavior 11:355-63.
55. Royer, J. M., R. W. Kulhavy, J. B. Lee, and S. E. Peterson, 1986. The Sentence Verification Technique as a measure of listening and reading comprehension. Educational and Psychological Research 6:299-314.
56. Royer, J. M., D. J. Lynch, R. K. Hambleton, and C. Bulgarelli, 1984. Using the Sentence Verification Technique to assess the comprehension of technical text as a function of subject matter expertise. American Educational Research Journal 21:839-69.
57. Royer, J. M., H. Marchant, G. Sinatra, and D. Lovejoy, 1990. The prediction of college course performance from reading comprehension performance: Evidence for general and specific factors. American Educational Research Journal 27:158-79.
58. Sadoski, M., E. T. Goetz, and J. B. Fritz, 1993. Impact of concreteness on comprehensibility, interest, and memory for text: Implications for dual coding theory and text design. Journal of Educational Psychology 85 (2): 291-304.
59. Stang, D. J., 1975. Student evaluations of twenty-eight social psychology texts. Teaching of Psychology 2 (1): 12-15.
60. Trabasso, T., 1981. Can we integrate research and instruction on reading comprehension. In Children's prose comprehension, ed. C. M. Santa and B.L. Hayes, 103-16. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
61. Tyler, S. W., H. Delaney, and M. Kinnucan, 1983. Specifying the nature of reading ability differences and advance organizer effects. Journal of Educational Psychology 75 (3): 359-73.
62. Voss, J., and L. N. Silfies, 1996. Learning from history text: The interaction of knowledge and comprehension skill with text structure. Cognition and Instruction 14:45-68.
63. Weiten, W., R. E. Guadagno, and C. A. Beck, 1996. Students' perceptions of textbook pedagogical aids. Teaching of Psychology 23 (2): 105-07.
64. Wharton, W. P., 1987-1988. Imagery and the comprehension of college history texts: Free response measure. Imagination, Cognition, and Personality 7 (4): 323-33.
65. Woolfolk, A., 2004. Educational psychology. 9th ed. Boston: Pearson.
66. Zechmeister, J. S., and E. B. Zechmeister, 2000. Introductory textbooks and psychology's core concepts. Teaching of Psychology 27:6-11.