Adaptive attribute selection for configurator design via Shapley value

Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing: AIEDAM

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 185-195

  Wang, Yue ^a   Tseng, Mitchell M ^a  

^a HONG KONG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Attribute Selection; Configurator; Probability Ranking Principle; Shapley Value

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL RESULTS; ATTRIBUTE SELECTION; ATTRIBUTE VALUES; CONFIGURATION PROCESS; CONFIGURATOR; INFORMATION CONTENTS; INTERACTIVE PROCESS; NUMERICAL EXAMPLE; PRODUCT CONFIGURATION; PRODUCT RECOMMENDATION; QUERY SEQUENCE; SELECTION OF ATTRIBUTES; SHAPLEY VALUE;

CUSTOMER SATISFACTION; GAME THEORY; LAKES; NUMERICAL METHODS; SALES; USER INTERFACES;

PRODUCT DESIGN;

EID: 79956133853     PISSN: 08900604     EISSN: 14691760     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0890060410000624     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (44)

1. Birmingham, W., Brennan, A., & Siewiorek, D. (1988). MICON: A single board computer synthesis tool. IEEE Circuits and Devices Magazine 4(1), 37-46. (Pubitemid 18611960)
2. Burke, R. (2002). Interactive critiquing for catalog navigation in E-Commerce. Artificial Intelligence Review 18(3-4), 245-267. (Pubitemid 35350519)
3. Burke, R., Hammond, K.,& Young, B. (1996). Knowledge-based navigation of complex information spaces. Proc. 13th National Conf. Artificial Intelligence, pp. 462-468. Portland, OR: AAAI Press/MIT Press.
4. Burke, R., Hammond, K., & Young, B. (1997). The FindMe approach to assisted browsing. Journal of IEEE Expert 12(4), 32-40. (Pubitemid 127786037)
5. Cohen, S., Dror, G., & Ruppin, E. (2007). Feature selection via coalitional game theory. Neural Computation 19, 1939-1961.
6. Cox, D.R. (1970). The Analysis of Binary Data. London: Methuen.
7. Darr, T., & Birmingham,W. (2000). Part-selection triptych: A representation, problem properties and problem definition, and problem-solving method. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 14(1), 39-51.
8. Durrett, R. (2003). Probability: Theory and Examples, 3rd ed. New York: Thomson Learning/Brooks-Cole.
9. Efron, B. (1979). Bootstrap methods: Another look at the jackknife. Annals of Statistics 7(1), 1-26.
10. Elturky, F., & Nordin, R. (1986). BLADES: An expert system for analog circuit design. Proc. IEEE Symp. Circuit and System, pp. 552-555, San Jose, CA. (Pubitemid 16628069)
11. Enos, L. (2001). Report: Five keys for e-tail success. E-Commerce Times. Accessed at http://www.ecommercetimes.com/story/7743.html
12. Frayman, F., & Mittal, S. (1987). Cossack: A constraint based expert system for configuration task. In Knowledge-Based Expert Systems in Engineering: Planning and Design (Sriram, D., & Adey, R., Eds.), pp. 143-166. Boston: Computational Mechanics Publication.
13. Gelle, E., & Faltings, B. (2003). Solving mixed and conditional constraint satisfaction problems. Constraint 8(2), 107-141.
14. Hüllermeier, E. (1997). Case-based search techniques for solving configuration problems. Accessed at http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/old/79018.html
15. Kamakura,W.A., &Wedel, M. (1995). Life-style segmentation with tailored interviewing. Journal of Marketing Research 32, 308-317.
16. Keinan, A., Sandbank, B., Hilgetag, C., Meilijson, I., & Ruppin, E. (2004). Fair attribution of functional contribution in artificial and biological networks. Neural Computation 16(9), 1887-1915. (Pubitemid 38939227)
17. Kurniawan, S., Tseng, M., & So, R. (2003). Consumer decision making process in mass customization. Proc. 2003 World Congress on Mass Customization and Personalization, p. 38, Munich.
18. Lilien, G., Kotler, P., & Moorthy, K. (1992). Marketing Model. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
19. Löckenhoff, C., & Messer, T. (1994). Configuration. In CommonKADS Library for Expertise Modelling (Breuker, J., & Van de Velde, W., Eds.), pp. 197-212. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
20. Mailharro, D. (1998). A classification and constraint-based framework for configuration. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 12(4), 383-397. (Pubitemid 128508222)
21. McCutcheon, D., Raturi, A., & Meredith, J. (1994). The customizationresponsiveness squeeze. Sloan Management Review 35(2), 89-99.
22. McDermott, J. (1980). R1: An expert in the computer systems domain. Proc. 1st Annual National Conf. Artificial Intelligence, pp. 269-271, Stanford University.
23. Mittal, S., & Falkenhainer, B. (1990). Dynamic constraint satisfaction problems. Proc. American Association for Artificial Intelligence, pp. 25-32, Boston.
24. Mittal, S., & Frayman, F. (1989). Towards a generic model of configuration task. Proc. Int. Joint Conf. Artificial Intelligence, pp. 1395-1401. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
25. Piller, F., & Moeslein, K. (2004). Does mass customization pay? An economic approach to evaluate customer integration. Production Planning & Control 15(4), 435-444.
26. Rahmer, J., & Voß, A. (1996). Case-based reasoning in the configuration of telecooperation systems, pp. 93-98, AAAI Technical Report FS-96-03. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.
27. Reilly, R., McCarthy, K., McGinty, L., & Smyth, B. (2004). Dynamic critiquing. Advances in Case-Based Reasoning, pp. 763-777. Berlin: Springer.
28. Sabin, D., & Freuder, E. (1996). Configuration as composite constraint satisfaction. Proc. 1st Artificial Intelligence and Manufacturing Research Planning Workshop, pp. 153-161. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.
29. Sabin, M., & Freuder, E. (1998). Detecting and resolving inconsistency and redundancy in conditional constraint satisfaction problems. Accessed at http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/sabin98detecting.html
30. Sabin, D., & Weigel, R. (1998). Product configuration frameworks-a survey. IEEE Intelligent Systems 13, 42-49. (Pubitemid 128574931)
31. Salvador, F., & Forza, C. (2004). Configuring products to address the customization-responsiveness squeeze: A survey of management issues and opportunities. International Journal of Production Economics 91(3), 273-291.
32. Schierholt, K. (2001). Process configuration: Combining the principles of product configuration and process planning. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 15(5), 411-424. (Pubitemid 34091546)
33. Schwartz, B. (2004). The Paradox of Choice: Why More Is Less. New York: ECCO.
34. Shannon, C.E. (1948). Amathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal 27(7), 379-423.
35. Shapley, L. (1953). Avalue for n-person games. In Contributions to the Theory of Games, Vol. 1 (Kuhn, H.W.,& Tucker, A.W., Eds.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
36. Simonson, I. (2005). Determinants of customers' responses to customized offers: Conceptual framework and research propositions. Journal of Marketing 69(1), 32-45. (Pubitemid 40195117)
37. Stumptner, M., Friedrich, G.,& Haselböck, A. (1998). Generative constraintbased configuration of large technical systems. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 12(4), 307-320. (Pubitemid 128508216)
38. Tseng, H., Chang, C., & Chang, S. (2005). Applying case-based reasoning for product configuration in mass customization environments. Expert Systems With Applications 29(4), 913-925. (Pubitemid 41394461)
39. Tseng, M., & Piller, F. (2003). New direction for mass customization. In The Customer Centric Enterprise (Piller, F., & Tseng, M., Eds.), pp. 519-535. Berlin: Springer.
40. van Rijsbergen, C.J. (1979). Information Retrieval. London: Butterworths.
41. Wang, Y., & Tseng, M.M. (2008). Incorporating probabilistic model of customers' preferences in concurrent engineering. Annals of the CIRP 58(1), 137-140.
42. Wang, Y., & Tseng, M.M. (2009). Attribute selection for configurator design based on Shapley value. Proc. ASME 2009 Int. Design Engineering Technical Conf., Computers and Information in Engineering Conf. (IDETC/CIE 2009), Paper No. DETC2009-86904.
43. Wielinga, B.,& Schreiber, G. (1997). Configuration-design problem solving IEEE Expert: Intelligent Systems and Their Applications 12(2), 49-56.
44. Yu, B., Skovgaard, H.. & Baan Frond Office Systems. (1998). A configuration tool to increase product competitiveness. IEEE Intelligent Systems 13(July/August), 34-41.