Reexamining relative advantage and perceived usefulness: An empirical study

International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 46-59

  Wang, Youwei ^a   Meister, Darren ^b   Wang, Yinglei ^c  

^a FUDAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

^c ACADIA UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Comparable ICT applications; ICT adoption; ICT promotion strategy; Perceived usefulness; Relative advantage

Indexed keywords

EID: 79956128273     PISSN: 15501876     EISSN: 15501337     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4018/jicte.2011010105     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Adams, D. A., Nelson, R. R., & Todd, P. A. (1992). Perceived Usefulness, Ease of Use, and Usage of Information Technology - A Replication. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 16(2), 227-247. doi:10.2307/249577
2. Agarwal, R., & Karahanna, E. (2000). Time flies when you're having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 24(4), 665-694. doi:10.2307/3250951
3. Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (1998). A conceptual and operational definition of personal innovativeness in the domain of information technology. Information Systems Research, 9(2), 204-215. doi:10.1287/isre.9.2.204
4. Barclay, D., Higgins, C. A., & Thompson, R. L. (1995). The partial least squares approach to causal modeling, personal computing adoption and use as an illustration. Technology Studies, 2(2), 285-309.
5. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderatormediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
6. Bhattacherjee, A., & Premkumar, G. (2004). Understanding changes in belief and attitude toward information technology usage: A theoretical model and longitudinal test. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 28(2), 229-254.
7. Chin, W. W. (1998). Issues and opinions on structural equation modeling. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 22(1), vii-xvi.
8. Choudhury, V., & Karahanna, E. (2008). The Relative Advantage of Electronic Channels: A Multidimensional View. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 32(1), 179-200. (Pubitemid 351378754)
9. Compeau, D., Higgins, C. A., & Huff, S. (1999). Social cognitive theory and individual reactions to computing technology: A longitudinal study. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 23(2), 145-158. doi:10.2307/249749
10. Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995). Computer Self-Efficacy - Development Of A Measure And Initial Test. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 19(2), 189-211. doi:10.2307/249688
11. Compeau, D. R., Meister, D. B., & Higgins, C. A. (2007). From Prediction to Explanation: Reconceptualizing and Extending the Perceived Characteristics of Innovating. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8(8), 409-439.
12. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. doi:10.2307/249008
13. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User Acceptance of Computer-Technology - A Comparison of two Theoretical-Models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003. doi:10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
14. Fliegel, F. C., & Kivlin, J. E. (1966). Attributes of Innovations as Factors in Diffusion. American Journal of Sociology, 72(3), 235-248. doi:10.1086/224292
15. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39-50. doi:10.2307/3151312
16. Gefen, D., Straub, D. W., & Boudreau, M.-C. (2000). Structural Equation Modeling and Regression: Guidelines for Research Practice. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 4(7), 1-77.
17. Goodhue, D. L., & Thompson, R. L. (1995). Tasktechnology fit and individual performance. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 19(2), 213-236. doi:10.2307/249689
18. Jones, M. A., Mothersbaugh, D. L., & Beatty, S. E. (2002). Why customers stay: measuring the underlying dimensions of services switching costs and managing their differential strategic outcomes. Journal of Business Research, 55, 441-450. doi:10.1016/S0148-2963 (00) 00168-5
19. Karahanna, E., Agarwal, R., & Angst, C. M. (2006). Reconceptualizing compatibility beliefs in technology acceptance research. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 30(4), 781-804. (Pubitemid 46051904)
20. Lim, K. H., & Benbasat, I. (2000). The effect of multimedia on perceived equivocality and perceived usefulness of information systems. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 24(3), 449-471. doi:10.2307/3250969
21. Moore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. (1991). Development of an instrument to measure the perception of adopting an information technology innovation. Information Systems Research, 2(3), 192-222. doi:10.1287/isre.2.3.192
22. Ridings, C. M., & Gefen, D. (2000). Applying TAM to A Parallel Systems Conversion Strategy. Journal of Information Technology Theory & Application, 2(2), 1-11.
23. Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Will, A. (2008). Smart-PLS. Retrieved from http://www.smartpls.de/
24. Rogers, E. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press.
25. Rogers, E. M. (1962). Diffusion of Innovations (1st ed.). New York: Free Press.
26. Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995). Understanding Information Technology Usage - A Test of Competing Models. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 144-176. doi:10.1287/isre.6.2.144 (Pubitemid 126102974)
27. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204. doi:10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926 (Pubitemid 30594361)
28. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478.
29. Wixom, B. H., & Todd, P. A. (2005). A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance. Information Systems Research, 16(1), 85-102. doi:10.1287/isre.1050.0042 (Pubitemid 40701110)
30. Yang, Z. L., & Peterson, R. T. (2004). Customer perceived value, satisfaction, and loyalty: the role of switching costs. Psychology and Marketing, 21(10), 799-822. doi:10.1002/mar.20030 (Pubitemid 39375233)