Is it possible to recognize cervical artery dissection on stroke brain MR imaging? A matched case-control study

American Journal of Neuroradiology

Volumn 32, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 869-873

  Naggara, Olivier ^a   Soares, F ^a   Touze, E ^a   Roy, D ^b   Leclerc, X ^c   Pruvo, J P ^c   Mas, J L ^a   Meder, J F ^a   Oppenheim, C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

^b NOTRE DAME HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^c LILLE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CAROTID ARTERY INJURY; CASE CONTROL STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; FEMALE; HEMATOMA; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH STROKE SCALE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STROKE;

EID: 79956114329     PISSN: 01956108     EISSN: 1936959X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2553     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Schievink WI. Spontaneous dissection of the carotid and vertebral arteries. N Engl J Med 2001;344:898-906 (Pubitemid 32224399)
2. Debette S, Leys D. Cervical-artery dissections: predisposing factors, diagnosis, and outcome. Lancet Neurol 2009;8:668-78
3. Engelter ST, Brandt T, Debette S, et al. Antiplatelets versus anticoagulation in cervical artery dissection. Stroke 2007;38:2605-11 (Pubitemid 47329646)
4. Latchaw RE, Alberts MJ, Lev MH, et al. Recommendations for imaging of acute ischemic stroke: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Stroke 2009;40:3646-78
5. Fairhead JF, Mehta Z, Rothwell PM. Population-based study of delays in carotid imaging and surgery and the risk of recurrent stroke. Neurology 2005;65:371-75 (Pubitemid 41099798)
6. Halliday AW, Lees T, Kamugasha D, et al. Waiting times for carotid endarterectomy in UK: observational study. BMJ 2009;338:b1847
7. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Radiology 2003;226:24-28 (Pubitemid 36163903)
8. Mokri B, Houser OW, Sandok BA, et al. Spontaneous dissections of the vertebral arteries. Neurology 1988;38:880-85
9. Provenzale JM, Morgenlander JC, Gress D. Spontaneous vertebral dissection: clinical, conventional angiographic, CT, and MR findings. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1996;20:185-93 (Pubitemid 26108699)
10. Arnold M, Bousser MG, Fahrni G, et al. Vertebral artery dissection: presenting findings and predictors of outcome. Stroke 2006;37:2499-503 (Pubitemid 44454668)
11. Zangerle A, Kiechl S, Spiegel M, et al. Recanalization after thrombolysis in stroke patients: predictors and prognostic implications. Neurology 2007;68:39-44 (Pubitemid 46058549)
12. Georgiadis D, Lanczik O, Schwab S, et al. IV thrombolysis in patients with acute stroke due to spontaneous carotid dissection. Neurology 2005;64:1612-14 (Pubitemid 40617700)
13. Derex L, Nighoghossian N, Turjman F, et al. Intravenous TPA in acute ischemic stroke related to internal carotid artery dissection. Neurology 2000;54:2159-61 (Pubitemid 30397221)
14. Lavallee PC, Mazighi M, Saint-Maurice JP, et al. Stent-assisted endovascular thrombolysis versus intravenous thrombolysis in internal carotid artery dissection with tandem internal carotid and middle cerebral artery occlusion. Stroke 2007;38:2270-74 (Pubitemid 47457567)
15. Baumgartner RW, Georgiadis D, Nedeltchev K, et al. Stent-assisted endovascular thrombolysis versus intravenous thrombolysis in internal carotid artery dissection with tandem internal carotid and middle cerebral artery occlusion. Stroke 2008;39:e27-28
16. Schabitz WR. MR mismatch is useful for patient selection for thrombolysis: No. Stroke 2009;40:2908-09
17. Hacke W, Albers G, Al-Rawi Y, et al. The desmoteplase in acute ischemic stroke trial (DIAS): a phase II MRI-based 9-hour window acute stroke thrombolysis trial with intravenous desmoteplase. Stroke 2005;36:66-73 (Pubitemid 40054177)