The role of working memory and contextual constraints in children's processing of relative clauses

Journal of Child Language

Volumn 38, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 579-605

  Weighall, Anna R ^a   Altmann, Gerry T M ^b  

^a SHEFFIELD HALLAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ASSOCIATION; CHILD; COGNITION; COMPREHENSION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT; LEARNING; LINGUISTICS; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; SEMANTICS; SHORT TERM MEMORY; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

CHILD; COGNITION; COMPREHENSION; CUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT; MALE; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; SEMANTICS; SPEECH PERCEPTION; VERBAL LEARNING;

EID: 79956102071     PISSN: 03050009     EISSN: 14697602     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0305000910000267     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Bates, E., Devescovi, A. & D'Amico, S. (1999). Processing complex sentences : A cross-linguistic study. Language and Cognitive Processes 14, 69-123.
2. Bates, E. & MacWhinney, B. (1989). Functionalism and the competition model. In B. MacWhinney & E. Bates (eds), The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing, 3-73. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
3. Booth, J. R., MacWhinney, B. & Harasaki, Y. (2000). Developmental differences in visual and auditory processing of complex sentences. Child Development 74, 981-1003.
4. Cohen, J. D., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M. & Provost, J. (1993). PsyScope: A new graphic interactive environment for designing psychology experiments. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers 25, 257-71.
5. Correa, L. M. (1995). An alternative assessment of children's comprehension of relative clauses. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 24, 183-203.
6. Crain, S. & Steedman, M. J. (1985). On not being led up the garden path: The use of context by the psychological parser. In D. Dowty, L. Karttunen & A. Zwicky (eds), Natural language parsing : Psychological, computational, and theoretical perspectives, 320-58. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
7. Dahan, D. & Tanenhaus, M. (2005). Looking at the rope when looking for the snake : Conceptually mediated eye movements during spoken-word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 12, 453-59. (Pubitemid 41382746)
8. Daneman, M. & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 19, 450-66.
9. Eisenberg, S. (2002). Interpretation of relative clauses by young children : Another look. Journal of Child Language 29, 177-88.
10. Felser, C., Marinis, T. & Clahsen, H. (2003). Children's processing of ambiguous sentences : A study of relative clause attachment. Language Acquisition 11, 127-63.
11. Ford, J. D., Bresnan, J. W. & Kaplan, R. M. (1982). A competence based theory of syntactic closure. In J. W. Bresnan (ed.), The mental representation of grammatical relations, 727-96. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. Fragman, C., Goodluck, H. & Heggie, L. (2007). Child and adult construal of restrictive relative clauses : Knowledge of grammar and differential effects of syntactic context. Journal of Child Language 34, 345-80.
13. Frazier, L. (1987). Sentence processing : A tutorial review. In M. Coltheart (ed.), Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading, 539-86. Hillsdale, NJ : Erlbaum.
14. Friedman, N. & Novogrodsky, R. (2004). The acquisition of relative clause comprehension in Hebrew: A study of SLI and normal development. Journal of Child Language 31, 661-81. (Pubitemid 39636981)
15. Gaulin, C. A. & Campbell, T. F. (1994). Procedure for assessing verbal working memory in normal school-age children : Some preliminary data. Perceptual and Motor Skills 79, 55-64.
16. Gibson, E. (1998). Linguistic complexity : Locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition, 68, 1-76. (Pubitemid 128424124)
17. Goodluck, H. (1990). Knowledge integration in processing and acquisition : Comments on Grimshaw and Rosen. In L. Frazier & J. De Villiers (eds), Language processing and language acquisition, 369-82. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
18. Goodluck, H. & Tavakolian, S. (1982). Competence and processing in children's grammar of relative clauses. Cognition 11, 1-27.
19. Gordon, P. C., Hendrick, R. & Johnson, M. (2001). Memory interference during language processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology : Learning, Memory and Cognition 27, 1411-23. (Pubitemid 33684702)
20. Gordon, P. C., Hendrick, R. & Levine, W. H. (2002). Memory load interference in syntactic processing. Psychological Science 13, 425-30. (Pubitemid 41692263)
21. Hamburger, H. & Crain, S. (1982). Relative acquisition. In S. Kuczaj (eds), Language development II, 245-74. Hillsdale, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
22. Huettig, F. & Altmann, G. T. M. (2004). The online processing of ambiguous and unambiguous words in context : Evidence from head-mounted eye-tracking. In M. Carreiras & C. Clifton (eds), The on-line study of sentence comprehension: Eyetracking, ERP, and beyond, 187-207. New York: Psychology Press.
23. Huettig, F. & Altmann, G. T. M. (2005). Word meaning and the control of eye fixation: Semantic competitor effects and the visual world paradigm. Cognition 96, B23-B32.
24. Huettig, F. & Altmann, G. T. M. (2007). Visual-shape competition during languagemediated attention is based on lexical input and not modulated by contextual appropriateness. Visual Cognition 15, 985-1018. (Pubitemid 350011584)
25. Just, M. A. & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review 99, 122-49.
26. Just, M. A., Carpenter, P. A. & Keller, T. A. (1996). The capacity theory of comprehension : New frontiers of evidence and arguments. Psychological Review 103, 773-80. (Pubitemid 126664723)
27. Kidd, E. (2003). Relative clause comprehension revisited : Commentary on Eisenberg (2002). Journal of Child Language 30, 671-79. (Pubitemid 37110160)
28. Kidd, E. & Bavin, E. L. (2002). English-speaking children's comprehension of relative clauses : Evidence for general cognitive and language specific constraints on development. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 31, 599-617. (Pubitemid 41462068)
29. Kidd, E. & Bavin, E. L. (2007). Lexical and referential influences on on-line spoken language comprehension : A comparison of adults and primary school children. First Language 27, 29-52.
30. Kidd, E., Brandt, S., Lieven, E. & Tomasello, M. (2007). Object relatives made easy : A cross-linguistic comparison of the constraints influencing young children's processing of relative clauses. Language and Cognitive Processes 22, 860-92.
31. MacDonald, M. C. & Christiansen, M. H. (2002). Reassessing working memory: Comment on Just and Carpenter (1992) and Waters and Caplan (1996). Psychological Review 109, 35-54.
32. MacDonald, M. C., Just, M. A. & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). Working memory constraints on the processing of syntactic ambiguity. Cognitive Psychology 24, 56-98.
33. MacWhinney, B. & Pleh, C. (1988). The processing of restrictive relative clauses in Hungarian. Cognition 29, 95-141.
34. Mak, W. M., Vonk, W. & Schriefers, H. (2002). The influence of animacy on relative clause processing. Journal of Memory and Language 47, 50-68. (Pubitemid 36161070)
35. Mendelsohn, A. and Pearlmutter, N. (1999). Individual differences in attachment preferences. Poster presented at the 12th Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, New York.
36. Miller, G. A. (1962). Some psychological studies of grammar. American Psychologist 17, 748-62.
37. Nation, K., Adams, J. W., Bowyer-Crane, C. A. & Snowling, M. J. (1999). Working memory deficits in poor comprehenders reflect underlying language impairments. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 73, 139-58.
38. Pearlmutter, N. J. & MacDonald, M. C. (1995). Individual differences and probabilistic constraints in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language 34, 521-42.
39. Seidenberg, M. & MacDonald, M. C. (1999). A probabilistic constraints approach to language acquisition and processing. Cognitive Science 23, 569-88.
40. Sheldon, A. (1974). The role of parallel function in the acquisition of relative clauses in English. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 13, 272-81.
41. Sheldon, A. (1977). On strategies for processing relative clauses : A comparison of children and adults. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 6, 305-318.
42. Slobin, D. I. (1973). Cognitive prerequisites for the development of grammar. In C. A. Ferguson & D. I. Slobin (eds), Studies of child language development, 175-208. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
43. Snedeker, J. & Trueswell, J. C. (2004). The developing constraints on parsing decisions : The role of lexical-biases and referential scenes in child and adult sentence processing. Cognitive Psychology, 49, 238-99. (Pubitemid 39196026)
44. Snedeker, J. & Yuan, S. (2008). Effects of prosodic and lexical constraints on parsing in young children (and adults). Journal of Memory and Language 58, 574-608.
45. Spivey-Knowlton, M. & Tanenhaus, M. (1994). Referential context and syntactic ambiguity resolution. In C. Clifton, L. Frazier & K. Rayner (eds), Perspectives on sentence processing, 415-39, Hillsdale, NJ : LEA Press.
46. Stothard, S. E. & Hulme, C. (1992). Reading comprehension difficulties in children : The role of language comprehension and working memory skills. Reading and Writing 4, 245-56.
47. Swets, B., Desmut, T., Hambrick, D. Z. & Ferreira, F. (2007). The role of working memory in syntactic ambiguity resolution : A psychometric approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 136, 64-81.
48. Tanenhaus, M. K., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., Eberhard, K.M. & Sedivy, J. C. (1995). Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science 268, 1632-34.
49. Tavakolian, S. L. (1981). The conjoined-clause analysis of relative clauses. In S. L. Tavakolian (ed.), Language acquisition and linguistic theory, 167-87. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
50. Townsend, D. & Erb, M. (1975). Children's strategies for interpreting complex comparative questions. Journal of Child Language 2, 1-7.
51. Townsend, D., Ottaviano, D. & Bever, T. (1979). Immediate memory for words from main and subordinate clauses at different age levels. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 8, 83-101.
52. Traxler, M. (2002). Plausibility and subcategorisation preference in children's processing of temporarily ambiguous sentences : Evidence from self-paced reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 55A, 75-96.
53. Traxler, M. J., Morris, R. K. & Seeley, R. E. (2002). Processing subject and object relative clauses : Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language 47, 69-90. (Pubitemid 36161071)
54. Traxler, M. J., Williams, R. S., Blozis, S. A. & Morris, R. K. (2005). Working memory, animacy, and verb class in the processing of relative clauses. Journal of Memory and Language 53, 204-224. (Pubitemid 40854745)
55. Trueswell, J. C. & Gleitman, L. (2004). Children's eye movements during listening : Developmental evidence for a constraint-based theory of sentence processing. In J. M. Henderson & F. Ferreira (eds), The interface of language, vision, and action : Eye movements and the visual world, 319-46. New York: Psychology Press.
56. Trueswell, J. C., Sekerina, I., Hill, N. M. & Logrip, L. (1999). The kindergarten-path effect: Studying on-line sentence processing in young children. Cognition 73, 89-134.
57. Wanner, E. & Maratsos, M. (1978). An ATN approach to comprehension. In M. Halle, J. Bresnan & G. A. Miller (eds), Linguistic theory and psychological reality, 119-61. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
58. Weighall, A. (2008). On still being led down the kindergarten path: Children's processing of structural ambiguities. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 99, 75-95.