Determining inventor status and its effect on knowledge diffusion: A study on nanotechnology literature from China, Russia, and India

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 62, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 1166-1176

  Liu, Xuan ^a   Kaza, Siddharth ^b   Zhang, Pengzhu ^c   Chen, Hsinchun ^d  

^a EAST CHINA UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b TOWSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES; COAUTHORSHIP NETWORKS; INSTITUTIONAL DIFFERENCES; KNOWLEDGE DIFFUSION; RESEARCH ORGANIZATION; RUSSIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES; SOCIAL NETWORK ANALYSIS;

ELECTRIC NETWORK ANALYSIS; NANOTECHNOLOGY; RESEARCH; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

DIFFUSION;

EID: 79956093756     PISSN: 15322882     EISSN: 15322890     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.21528     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Ahuja, G., (2000). Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45 (3), 425-455.
2. Allison, P.D., (1995). Survival analysis using the SAS system: A practical guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
3. Arunachalam, S., &, Doss, M.J., (2000). Mapping international collaboration in science in Asia through coauthorship analysis. Current Science, 79 (5), 621-628.
4. Arunachalam, S., Srinivasan, R., &, Raman, V., (1994). International collaboration in science: Participation by the Asian giants. Scientometrics, 30 (1), 7-22.
5. Bonacich, P., (1987). Power and centrality: A family of measures. American Journal of Sociology, 92 (5), 1170-1182.
6. Bornmann, L., &, Daniel, H.D., (2008). Selecting manuscripts for a high-impact journal through peer review: A citation analysis of communications that were accepted by Angewandte Chemie International editor or rejected but published elsewhere. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59 (11), 1841-1852.
7. Burt, R.S., (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8. Cox, D.R., (1972). Regression models and life tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, B34, 187-220.
9. Davis, M., (2009). Author-choice open access publishing in the biological and medical literature: A citation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60 (1), 3-8.
10. Ding, Y., Yan, E.J., Frazho, A., &, Caverlee, J., (2009). PageRank for ranking authors in co-citation networks. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60 (11), 2229-2243.
11. Fleming, L., (2001). Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management Science, 47 (1), 117-132. (Pubitemid 34191966)
12. Freeman, L.C., (1979). Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 3, 215-239.
13. Guan, J., &, Ma, N., (2007). China's emerging presence in nanoscience and nanotechnology: A comparative bibliometric study of several nanoscience giants. Research Policy, 36 (6), 880-886. (Pubitemid 46898556)
14. Hassan, M.H.A., (2005). Nanotechnology: Small things and big changes in the developing world. Science, 309 (5731), 65-66. (Pubitemid 40934950)
15. Huang, Z., Chen, H., Chen, Z., &, Roco, M.C., (2004). International nanotechnology development in 2003: Country, institution, and technology field analysis based on USPTO patent database. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 6, 325-354.
16. Kretschmer, H., (2004). Author productivity and geodesic distance in bibliographic co-authorship networks, and visibility on the Web. Scientometrics, 60 (3), 409-420. (Pubitemid 38926349)
17. Leydesdorff, L., &, Sun, Y., (2009). National and international dimensions of the triple helix in Japan: University-industry-government versus international coauthorship relations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60 (4), 778-788.
18. Li, X., Chen, H., Dang, Y., Lin, Y., Larson, C.A., &, Roco, M.C., (2008). A longitudinal analysis of nanotechnology literature: 1976-2004. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 10, 3-22.
19. Liu, X., Zhang, P.Z., Li, X., Chen, H., Dang, Y., Larson, C.A., &, Wang, X.W., (2009). Trends for nanotechnology development in China, Russia, and India. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 11 (8), 1845-1866.
20. Luukkonen, T., Persson, O., &, Sivertsen, G., (1992). Understanding patterns of international scientific collaboration. Science, Technology & Human Values, 17 (1), 101-126.
21. Moody, J., (2004). The structure of a social science collaboration network: Disciplinary cohesion from 1963 to 1999. American Sociological Review, 69 (2), 213-238. (Pubitemid 38727984)
22. Nerkar, A., &, Paruchuri, S., (2005). Evolution of R&D capabilities: The role of knowledge networks within a firm. Management Science, 51 (5), 771-785. (Pubitemid 40867143)
23. Newman, M.E.J., (2001). From the cover: The structure of scientific collaboration networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 98 (2), 404-409. (Pubitemid 32105053)
24. Newman, M.E.J., (2004). Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 101 (1), 5200-5205. (Pubitemid 38469127)
25. Newman, M.E.J., (2005). A measure of betweenness centrality based on random walks. Social Networks, 27, 39-54. (Pubitemid 40272648)
26. Patrakosol, B., &, Olson, D.L., (2007). How interfirm collaboration benefits IT innovation. Information & Management, 44 (1), 53-62. (Pubitemid 46027480)
27. Podolny, J.M., &, Stuart, T.E., (1995). A role-based ecology of technological change. American Journal of Sociology, 100 (5), 1224-1260.
28. Singh, J., (2007). External collaboration, social networks and knowledge creation: Evidence from scientific publications. Danish Research Unit of Industrial Dynamics Summer Conference (pp. 1-43). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
29. Tretyakov, Y.D., (2007). Challenges of nanotechnological development in Russia and abroad. Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 77 (1), 15-21.
30. Wagner, C.S., &, Leydesdorff, L., (2005). Mapping global science using international co-authorships: A comparison of 1990 and 2000. International Journal of Technology and Globalization, 2 (1), 185-208.
31. Yamashita, Y., &, Okubo, Y., (2006). Patterns of scientific collaboration between Japan and France: Inter-sectoral analysis using Probabilistic Partnership Index (PPI). Scientometrics, 68 (2), 303-324. (Pubitemid 44597405)
32. Yoshikane, F., &, Kageura, K., (2004). Comparative analysis of coauthorship networks of different domains: The growth and change of networks. Scientometrics, 60 (3), 435-446.
33. Zitt, M., Bassecoulard, E., &, Okubo, Y., (2000). Shadows of the past in international cooperation: Collaboration profiles of the top five producers of science. Scientometrics, 47 (3), 627-657.
34. Zucker, L.G., &, Darby, M.R., (1996). Star scientists and institutional transformation: Patterns of invention and innovation in the formation of the biotechnology industry. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 93 (23), 12709-12716. (Pubitemid 26382707)