The dependency of the size-growth relationship of Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.) and European beech (Fagus sylvatica [L.]) in forest stands on long-term site conditions, drought events, and ozone stress

Trees - Structure and Function

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 355-369

  Pretzsch, Hans ^a   Dieler, Jochen ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Allocation principle; Competition; Diameter increment; Limitation; Resource partitioning; Size asymmetric growth; Stand structure

Indexed keywords

ALLOCATION PRINCIPLE; DIAMETER INCREMENT; LIMITATION; RESOURCE PARTITIONING; SIZE-ASYMMETRIC GROWTH; STAND STRUCTURE;

CLIMATE CHANGE; DROUGHT; ECOLOGY; LANDFORMS; OZONE;

FORESTRY;

APPROPRIATION; CLIMATES; COMPETITION; DIAMETER; DIMENSIONAL MEASUREMENT; DROUGHT; ECOLOGY; FAGUS SYLVATICA; FORESTS; GROWTH; OZONE; PICEA ABIES; RESOURCE MANAGEMENT;

FAGUS; FAGUS SYLVATICA; PICEA ABIES;

EID: 79956088043     PISSN: 09311890     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00468-010-0510-1     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Ammer Ch (1996) Konkurrenz um Licht-Zur Entwicklung der Naturverjüngung im Bergmischwald. Forst. Forschungsber. München, Forstwiss. Fak. der Univ. München, Nr. 158, 211 p.
2. Assmann E (1970) The principles of forest yield study. Pergamon Press, Oxford 506.
3. Assmann E, Franz F (1963) Vorläufige Fichten-Ertragstafel für Bayern. Forstl Forschungsanst München, Inst Ertragskd, 104 p.
4. Beierkuhnlein C, Foken Th (2008) Klimawandel in Bayern. Auswirkungen und Anpassungsmöglichkeiten. Bayreuther Forum Ökologie, University Bayreuth, vol 113, 501p.
5. Biging GS, Dobbertin M (1995) Evaluation of competition indices in individual tree growth models. For Sci 41: 360-377.
6. Bugmann H, Grote R, Lasch P, Lindner M, Suckow F (1997) A new forest gap model to study the effects of environmental change on forest structure and functioning. In: Mohren GMJ, Kramer K, Sabaté S (eds) Impacts of global change on tree physiology and forest ecosystems. Forestry sciences. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Wageningen, pp 255-261.
7. Bundesministerium für Ernährung, Landwirtschaft und Verbraucherschutz (2005) Die zweite Bundeswaldinventur-BWI2, Der Inventurbericht. Bundesministerium für Ernährung, Landwirtschaft und Verbraucherschutz, Bonn, 231p.
8. Canell MGR, Grace J (1993) Competition for light: detection, measurement, and quantification. Can J For Res 23: 1969-1979.
9. Eckstein D, Bauch J (1969) Beitrag zur Rationalisierung eines dendrochronolgischen Verfahrens und zur Rationalisierung seiner Aussagesicherheit. Forstwissenschaftliche Centralblatt 88: 230-250.
10. Elling W (1993) Immissionen im Ursachenkomplex von Tannenschädigung und Tannensterben. AFJZ 48(2): 87-95.
11. FAO (2005) Global Forest Resources Assessment 2005. FAO, Rome.
12. Hara T (1993) Mode of competition and size-structure dynamics in plant communities. Plant Species Biol 8: 75-84.
13. Jentsch A, Kreyling J, Beierkuhnlein C (2007) A new generation of climate change experiments: events, not trends. Front Ecol Environ 5(7): 365-374.
14. Kreutzer K, Foerst K (1978) Forstliche Wuchsgebietsgliederung Bayerns. Karte 1: 1, 000, 000. Bayerisches Staatsministerium für Ernährung, Landwirtschaft und Forsten.
15. Landsberg JJ (1986) Physiological ecology of forest production. Academic Press, New York, p 198.
16. Löw M, Herbinger K, Nunn AJ, Häberle K-H, Leuchner M, Heerdt C, Werner H, Wipfler P, Pretzsch H, Tausz M, Matyssek R (2006) Extraordinary drought of 2003 overrules ozone impact on adult beech trees (Fagus sylvatica). Trees 20: 539-548.
17. Mäkelä A, Hari P (1986) Stand growth model based on carbon uptake and allocation in individual trees. Ecol Mod 33: 205-229.
18. Matyssek R, Sandermann H (2003) Impact of ozone on trees: an ecophysiological perspective. Prog Bot 64: 349-404.
19. Matyssek R, Agerer R, Ernst D, Munch JC, Oßwald W, Pretzsch H, Priesack E, Schnyder H, Treutter D (2005) The plant's capacity in regulating resource demand. Plant Biol 7: 560-580.
20. Matyssek R, Wieser G, Ceulemans R, Renneberg H, Pretzsch H, Haberer K, Löw M, Nunn AJ, Werner H, Wipfler P, Oßwald W, Nikolova P, Hanke D, Kraigher H, Tausz M, Bahnweg G, Kitao M, Dieler J, Sandermann H, Herbinger K, Grebenc T, Blumenröther M, Deckmyn G, Grams TEE, Heerdt C, Leuchner M, Fabian P, Häberle KH (2010) Enhanced ozone strongly reduces carbon sink strength of adult beech (Fagus sylvatica)-resume from the free-air fumigation study at Kranzberg Forest. Environ Pollut 158: 2527-2532.
21. Mielikäinen K, Timonen M (1996) Growth trends of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris, L.) in unmanaged and regularly managed stands in southern and central Finland. In: Spiecker H, Mielikäinen K, Köhl M, Skovsgaard JP (eds) Growth trends in European forests. European Forest Institute, Research Report 5, Springer, Heidelberg, pp 41-59.
22. Müller I, Schmid B, Weiner J (2000) The effect of nutrient availability on biomass allocation patterns in 27 species of herbaceous plants. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 3(2): 115-127.
23. Niklas KJ (1994) Plant allometry. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
24. Oliver CD, Larson B (1996) Forest stand dynamics. Wiley, New York, p 520.
25. Pretzsch H (1999) Waldwachstum im Wandel, Konsequenzen für Forstwissenschaft und Forstwirtschaft. Forstw Cbl 118: 228-250.
26. Pretzsch H (2009) Forest dynamics, growth and yield. From measurement to model. Springer, Berlin 664.
27. Pretzsch H (2010) Zur Verteilung des Zuwachses zwischen den Bäumen eines Bestandes und Abhängigkeit des Verteilungsschlüssels von den Standortbedingungen. Allg Forst J Ztg 181(1/2): 4-13.
28. Pretzsch H, Biber P (2005) A re-evaluation of Reineke's rule and stand density index. For Sci 51: 304-320.
29. Pretzsch H, Biber P (2010) Size-symmetric versus size-asymmetric competition and growth partitioning among trees in forest stands along an ecological gradient in central Europe. Can J For Res 40(2): 370-384.
30. Pretzsch H, Schütze G (2009) Transgressive overyielding in mixed compared with pure stands of Norway spruce and European beech in Central Europe: evidence on stand level and explanation on individual tree level. Eur J Forest Res 128: 183-204.
31. Pretzsch H, Kahn M, Grote R (1998) Die Fichten-Buchen-Mischbestände des Sonderforschungsbereiches "Wachstum oder Parasitenabwehr?" im Kranzberger Forst. Forstwisschaftliches Centralblatt 117: 241-257.
32. Pretzsch H, Grote R, Reineking B, Rötzer T, Seifert S (2008) Models for forest ecosystem management: a European perspective. Ann Bot 101: 1065-1087.
33. Pretzsch H, Dieler J, Matyssek R, Wipfler P (2010) Tree and stand growth of mature Norway spruce and European beech under long-term ozone fumigation. Environ Pollut 158: 1061-1070.
34. Prodan M (1965) Holzmeßlehre. JD Sauerländer's Verlag, Frankfurt am Main, 644 p.
35. R Development Core Team (2009) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ISBN 3-900051-07-0, Vienna, Austria.
36. Reineke LH (1933) Perfecting a stand-density index for even-aged forests. J Agr Res 46: 627-638.
37. Röhle H (1987) Entwicklung von Vitalität, Zuwachs und Biomassenstruktur der Fichte in verschiedenen bayerischen Untersuchungsgebieten unter dem Einfluß der neuartigen Walderkrankungen. Forstl Forschungsber München 83: 122.
38. Schober R (1967) Buchen-Ertragstafel für mäßige und starke Durchforstung. In: Schober R (1972) Die Rotbuche 1971. Schr Forstl Fak Univ Göttingen u Niedersächs Forstl Versuchsanst 43/44, JD Sauerländer's Verlag, Frankfurt am Main, 333 p.
39. Schweingruber FH, Albrecht H, Beck M, Hessel J, Joos K, Keller D, Kontic R, Lange K, Niederer M, Nippel C, Spang S, Spinnler A, Steiner B, Winkler-Seifert A (1986) Abrupte Zuwachsschwankungen in Jahrringabfolgen als ökologische Indikatoren. Ber Eidg Anst forstl Versuchswesen, pp 125-179.
40. Schwinning S, Weiner S (1998) Mechanisms determining the degree of size asymmetry in competition among plants. Oecologia 113: 447-455.
41. Spiecker H, Mielikäinen K, Köhl M, Skovsgaard JP (eds) (1996) Growth trends in European forests. European Forest Institute, Research Report 5, Springer, Heidelberg, 372 p.
42. Thomas SC, Weiner J (1989) Growth, death and size distribution change in an Impatiens Pallida population. J Ecol 77: 524-536.
43. Utschig H (1989) Waldwachstumskundliche Untersuchungen im Zusammenhang mit Waldschäden. Auswertung der Zuwachstrendanalyseflächen des Lehrstuhles für Waldwachstumskunde für die Fichte (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) in Bayern. Forstl Forschungsber München 97, 198p.
44. van Kuijk M, Anten NPR, Oomen RJ, van Bentum DW, Werger MJA (2008) The limited importance of size-asymmetric light competition and growth of pioneer species in early secondary forest succession in Vietnam. Oecologia 157: 1-12.
45. Weiner J (1990) Asymmetric competition in plant populations. Trends Ecol Evol 5(11): 360-364.
46. Weiner J, Thomas SC (1986) Size variability and competition in plant monocultures. Oikos 47: 211-222.
47. Werner H, Fabian P (2002) Free-air fumigation of mature trees-a novel system for controlled ozone enrichment in grown-up beech and spruce canopies. Environ Sci Pollut Res 9: 12-117.
48. Wichmann L (2001) Annual variations in competition symmetry in even-aged Sitka Spruce. Ann Bot 88: 145-151.
49. Wichmann L (2002) Competition symmetry. Chapter 7. In: modelling the effects of competition between individual trees in forest stands. PhD thesis, University of Forestry, Copenhagen, pp 67-77.