On the distribution of growth among the trees in a stand and the dependency of the ratio of distribution on the respective site conditions;Zur verteilung des zuwachses zwischen den bäumen eines bestandes und abhängigkeit des verteilungsschlüssels von den standortbedingungen

Allgemeine Forst- und Jagdzeitung

Volumn 181, Issue 1-2, 2010, Pages 4-13

  Pretzsch, H ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Asymmetric competition; Matter allocation; Resource distribution; Size symmetric competition

Indexed keywords

FAGUS; FAGUS SYLVATICA; PICEA ABIES; PINUS SYLVESTRIS; QUERCUS PETRAEA;

EID: 77949791446     PISSN: 00025852     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. AMMER, CH. (1996) : Konkurrenz um Licht - Zur Entwicklung der Naturverjüngung im Bergmischwald. Forst. Forschungsber. München, Forstwiss. Fak. der Univ. München, Nr. 158, 211 S.
2. rd edn. McGraw-Hill Inc, New York, 331 S.
3. BIGING, G. S. und M. DOBBERTIN (1995) : Evaluation of competition indices in individual tree growth models. For Sci 41: 360-377.
4. CANNELL, M. G. R. und J. GRACE (1993) : Competition for light: detection, measurement, and quantification. Can. J. For. Res. 23: 1969-1979.
5. HARA, T. (1993) : Mode of Competition and Size-structure Dynamics in Plant Communities. Plant Species Biol. 8: 75-84.
6. Müller, I., B. SCHMID und J. WEINER (2000) : The effect of nutrient availability on biomass allocation patterns in 27 species of herbaceous plants. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 3/2: 115-127.
7. PRETZSCH, H. (1997) : Analysis and modeling of spatial stand structures. Methological considerations based on mixed beech-larch stands in Lower Saxony. Forest Ecology and Management 97: 237-253.
8. PRETZSCH, H. (2006) : Von der Standflächeneffizienz der Bäume zur Dichte-Zuwachs-Beziehung des Bestandes. Beitrag zur Integration von Baum-und Bestandesebene. Allg. Forst-u. J.-Ztg. 177 (10/11) : 188-199.
9. PRETZSCH, H., P. BIBER und J. DURSKY (2002) : The single tree based stand simulator SILVA. Construction, application and evaluation. Forest Ecology and Management 162: 3-21.
10. PRETZSCH, H. und P. BIBER (2005) : A re-evaluation of Reineke's rule and Stand Density Index. For Sci 51: 304-320.
11. PRETZSCH, H., R. GROTE, B. REINEKING, TH. ROTZER und ST. SEIFERT (2008) : Models for Forest Ecosystem Management. A European Perspective. Annals of Botany 101: 1065-1087.
12. PRETZSCH, H. (2009) : Forest dynamics, growth and yield. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 664 S.
13. PRODAN, M. (1951) : Messung der Waldbestände. J. D. Sauerländer's Verlag, Frankfurt am Main, 260 S.
14. REINEKE, L. H. (1933) : Perfecting a stand-density index for even-aged forests. J Agr. Res. 46: 627-638.
15. SCHÜTZ, J.-PH. (1989) Der Plenterbetrieb, Fachbereich Waldbau, ETH, 1989, 54 S.
16. SCHWINNING, S. und J. WEINER (1998) : Mechanisms determining the degree of size asymmetry in competition among plants. Oecologia 113: 447-455.
17. THOMAS, S. C. und J. WEINER (1989) : Growth, Death and Size Distribution Change in an Impatiens Pallida Population. Journal of Ecology 77: 524-536.
18. WEINER, J. und S. C. THOMAS (1986) : Size variability and competition in plant monocultures. Oikos 47: 211-222.
19. WEINER, J. (1990) : Asymmetric competition in plant populations. Tree 5 (11) : 360-364.
20. WEINER, J., P. STOLL, H. MULLER-LANDAU und A. JASENTULIYANA (2001) : The Effects of Density, Spatial Pattern, and Competitive Symmetry on Size Variation in Simulated Plant Populations. The American Naturalist 158 (4) : 438-450.
21. WENK, G., V. ANTANAITIS und Š. ŠMELKO (1990) : Waldertragslehre. VEB Deutscher Landwirtschaftsverlag, Berlin, 448 S.
22. WICHMANN, L. (2001) : Annual Variations in Competition Symmetry in Evenaged Sitka Spruce. Annals of Botany 88: 145-151.