Early functional outcome after subvastus or parapatellar approach in knee arthroplasty is comparable

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

Volumn 19, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 943-951

  van Hemert, Wouter L W ^a   Senden, Rachel ^a   Grimm, Bernd ^a   van der Linde, Matthijs J A ^a   Lataster, Arno ^b   Heyligers, Ide C ^a  

^a Sittard Geleen Heerlen   (Netherlands)

^b MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Clinimetrics; Knee replacement; Performance based test; Subvastus approach; Vastus medialis anatomy

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CADAVER; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVALESCENCE; DISSECTION; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; KNEE; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PATELLA; PHYSIOLOGY; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUADRICEPS FEMORIS MUSCLE; RADIOGRAPHY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; CADAVER; DISSECTION; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PATELLA; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUADRICEPS MUSCLE; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; RISK ASSESSMENT; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 79956065856     PISSN: 09422056     EISSN: 14337347     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00167-010-1292-0     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Argenson JN, Scuderi GR, Komistek RD, Scott WN, Kelly MA, Aubaniac JM (2005) In vivo kinematic evaluation and design considerations related to high flexion in total knee arthroplasty. J Biomech 38: 277-284.
2. Bach CM, Nogler M, Steingruber IE, Ogon M, Wimmer C, Gobel G, Krismer M (2002) Scoring systems in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 399: 184-196.
3. Barink M, van de Groes S, Verdonschot N, De Waal Malefijt M (2006) The difference in trochlear orientation between the natural knee and current prosthetic knee designs; towards a truly physiological prosthetic groove orientation. J Biomech 39: 1708-1715.
4. Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW (1988) Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 15: 1833-1840.
5. Berth A, Urbach D, Neumann W, Awiszus F (2007) Strength and voluntary activation of quadriceps femoris muscle in total knee arthroplasty with midvastus and subvastus approaches. J Arthroplasty 22: 83-88.
6. Chen AF, Alan RK, Redziniak DE, Tria AJ Jr (2006) Quadriceps sparing total knee replacement. The initial experience with results at two to four years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88: 1448-1453.
7. Cila E, Guzel V, Ozalay M, Tan J, Simsek SA, Kanatli U, Ozturk A (2002) Subvastus versus medial parapatellar approach in total knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 122: 65-68.
8. Davies AP (2002) Rating systems for total knee replacement. Knee 9: 261-266.
9. Franklin PD, Li W, Ayers DC (2008) The chitranjan ranawat award: functional outcome after total knee replacement varies with patient attributes. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466: 2597-2604.
10. Holt G, Nunn T, Allen RA, Forrester AW, Gregori A (2008) Variation of the vastus medialis obliquus insertion and its relevance to minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 23: 600-604.
11. Huang HT, Su JY, Chang JK, Chen CH, Wang GJ (2007) The early clinical outcome of minimally invasive quadriceps-sparing total knee arthroplasty: report of a 2-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty 22: 1007-1012.
12. Hubbard JK, Sampson HW, Elledge JR (1997) Prevalence and morphology of the vastus medialis oblique muscle in human cadavers. Anat Rec 249: 135-142.
13. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN (1989) Rationale of the knee society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248: 13-14.
14. Kelly MJ, Rumi MN, Kothari M, Parentis MA, Bailey KJ, Parrish WM, Pellegrini VD Jr (2006) Comparison of the vastus-splitting and median parapatellar approaches for primary total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88: 715-720.
15. Kleijn LL, van Hemert WL, Meijers WG, Kester AD, Lisowski L, Grimm B, Heyligers IC (2007) Functional improvement after unicompartmental knee replacement: a follow-up study with a performance based knee test. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 10: 1187-1193.
16. Kort N (2007) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Thesis. University of Groningen. 76-87.
17. Kreibich DN, Vaz M, Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH, Kim P, Hardie R, Kramer J, Kirkley A (1996) What is the best way of assessing outcome after total knee replacement? Clin Orthop Relat Res 331: 221-225.
18. Lavernia CJ, D' Apuzzo MR, Hernandez VH, Lee DJ, Rossi MD (2006) Postdischarge costs in arthroplasty surgery. J Arthroplasty 21: 144-150.
19. Lefebvre R, Leroux A, Poumarat G, Galtier B, Guillot M, Vanneuville G, Boucher JP (2006) Vastus medialis: anatomical and functional considerations and implications based upon human and cadaveric studies. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 29: 139-144.
20. Matsueda M, Gustilo RB (2000) Subvastus and medial parapatellar approaches in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 371: 161-168.
21. Maxwell S, Delaney H (2003) Designing experiments and analyzing data: a model comparison perspective, 2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum, UK.
22. Miner AL, Lingard EA, Wright EA, Sledge CB, Katz JN (2003) Knee range of motion after total knee arthroplasty: how important is this as an outcome measure? J Arthroplasty 18: 286-294.
23. Mizner RL, Petterson SC, Snyder-Mackler L (2005) Quadriceps strength and the time course of functional recovery after total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 35: 424-436.
24. Mizner RL, Petterson SC, Stevens JE, Vandenborne K, Snyder-Mackler L (2005) Early quadriceps strength loss after total knee arthroplasty. The contributions of muscle atrophy and failure of voluntary muscle activation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87: 1047-1053.
25. Mizner RL, Stevens JE, Snyder-Mackler L (2003) Voluntary activation and decreased force production of the quadriceps femoris muscle after total knee arthroplasty. Phys Ther 83: 359-365.
26. Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, van der Slikke RM, van Lummel RC, Benink RJ, Bouter LM, de Vet HC (2005) Reproducibility and validity of the Dynaport Kneetest. Arthritis Rheum 53: 357-363.
27. Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, van Lummel RC, de Witte SJ, Wetzels L, Bouter LM, de Vet HC (2005) Construct validity of the Dynaport Kneetest: a comparison with observations of physical therapists. Osteoarthr Cartil 13: 738-743.
28. Ozkoc G, Hersekli MA, Akpinar S, Ozalay M, Uysal M, Cesur N, Tandogan RN (2005) Time dependent changes in patellar tracking with medial parapatellar and midvastus approaches. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 13: 654-657.
29. Panagiotopoulos E, Strzelczyk P, Herrmann M, Scuderi G (2006) Cadaveric study on static medial patellar stabilizers: the dynamizing role of the vastus medialis obliquus on medial patellofemoral ligament. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14: 7-12.
30. Parent E, Moffet H (2002) Comparative responsiveness of locomotor tests and questionnaires used to follow early recovery after total knee arthroplasty. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 83: 70-80.
31. Ryd L, Karrholm J, Ahlvin P (1997) Knee scoring systems in gonarthrosis. Evaluation of interobserver variability and the envelope of bias. Score assessment Group. Acta Orthop Scand 68: 41-45.
32. Sakai N, Luo ZP, Rand JA, An KN (2000) The influence of weakness in the vastus medialis oblique muscle on the patellofemoral joint: an in vitro biomechanical study. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 15: 335-339.
33. Tait RC, Pollard CA, Margolis RB, Duckro PN, Krause SJ (1987) The pain disability index: psychometric and validity data. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 68: 438-441.
34. Taskiran E, Dinedurga Z, Yagiz A, Uludag B, Ertekin C, Lok V (1998) Effect of the vastus medialis obliquus on the patellofemoral joint. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 6: 173-180.
35. van den Akker-Scheek I (2007) Recovery after short-stay total hip and knee arthroplasty. Evaluation of a support program and outcome determination. Thesis University of Groningen. 111-128.
36. van den Dikkenberg N, Meijer OG, van der Slikke RM, van Lummel RC, van Dieen JH, Pijls B, Benink RJ, Wuisman PI (2002) Measuring functional abilities of patients with knee problems: rationale and construction of the Dynaport knee test. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 10: 204-212.
37. van Hemert WL, Senden R, Grimm B, Kester AD, van der Linde MJ, Heyligers IC (2008) Patella retention versus replacement in total knee arthroplasty; functional and clinimetric aspects. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2: 259-265.
38. van Mameren H, Lataster A, Rensema H, Drukker J (1985) The use of modern imaging techniques (CT-scanning and NMR) in the study of the locomotor apparatus. Acta Morphol Neerl Scand 23: 247-257.
39. Weinhardt C, Barisic M, Bergmann EG, Heller KD (2004) Early results of subvastus versus medial parapatellar approach in primary total knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 124: 401-403.
40. Weinrauch P, Myers N, Wilkinson M, Dodsworth J, Fitzpatrick P, Whitehouse S (2006) Comparison of early postoperative rehabilitation outcome following total knee arthroplasty using different surgical approaches and instrumentation. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 14: 47-52.
41. White RE Jr, Allman JK, Trauger JA, Dales BH (1999) Clinical comparison of the midvastus and medial parapatellar surgical approaches. Clin Orthop Relat Res 376: 117-122.