Parametrial involvement in FIGO stage IB1 cervical carcinoma: Diagnostic impact of tumor diameter in preoperative magnetic resonance imaging

International Journal of Gynecological Cancer

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 349-354

  Kamimori, Teruyo ^a   Sakamoto, Kimihiko ^a   Fujiwara, Kiyoshi ^a   Umayahara, Kenji ^a   Sugiyama, Yuko ^a   Utsugi, Kuniko ^a   Takeshima, Nobuhiro ^a   Tanaka, Hiroko ^b   Gomi, Naoya ^b   Takizawa, Ken ^a  

^a Departments of Gynecology   (Japan)

^b CANCER INSTITUTE HOSPITAL   (Japan)

Author keywords

Cervical carcinoma; Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); Parametrial involvement; Radical hysterectomy; Tumor diameter

Indexed keywords

CISPLATIN;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BRACHYTHERAPY; CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER INVASION; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; CANCER SIZE; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURGERY; CANCER SURVIVAL; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; LYMPH NODE METASTASIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA; VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY;

ADULT; AGED; CARCINOMA, SQUAMOUS CELL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM STAGING; PELVIC FLOOR; PROGNOSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TUMOR BURDEN; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79956065772     PISSN: 1048891X     EISSN: 15251438     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/IGC.0b013e3182072eea     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Piver MS, Rutledge F, Smith JP. Five classes of extended hysterectomy for women with cervical cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 1974;44:265-272.
2. Randall ME, Michale H, Long H 3rd, et al. Uterine cervix. In: Barakat RR, Perelman RO, Markman M, Randall M, eds. Principles and Practice of Gynecologic Oncology. 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2009:623-681.
3. Landoni F, Maneo A, Cormio G, et al. Class II versus class III radical hysterectomy in stage IB-IIA cervical cancer: a prospective randomized study. Gynecol Oncol. 2001;80:3-12. (Pubitemid 32062080)
4. Panici PB, Angioli R, Palaia I, et al. Tailoring the parametrectomy in stages IA2-IB1 cervical carcinoma: is it feasible and safe? Gynecol Oncol. 2005;96:792-798. (Pubitemid 40255503)
5. Covens A, Rosen B, Murphy J, et al. How important is removal of the parametrium at surgery for carcinoma of the cervix? Gynecol Oncol. 2002;84:145-149. (Pubitemid 34056481)
6. Wright JD, Grigsby PW, Brooks R, et al. Utility of parametrectomy for early stage cervical cancer treated with radical hysterectomy. Cancer. 2007;110:1281-1286. (Pubitemid 47435599)
7. Strnad P, Robova H, Skapa P, et al. A prospective study of sentinel lymph node status and parametrial involvement in patients with small tumour volume cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2008;109:280-284.
8. Frumovitz M, Sun CC, Schmeler KM, et al. Parametrial involvement in radical hysterectomy specimens for women with early-stage cervical cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114:93-99.
9. Delgado G, Bundy B, Zaino R, et al. Prospective surgical-pathological study of disease-free interval in patients with stage IB squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol. 1990;38:352-357. (Pubitemid 20362555)
10. Kamura T, Tsukamoto N, Tsuruchi N, et al. Multivariate analysis of the histopathologic prognostic factors of cervical cancer in patients undergoing radical hysterectomy. Cancer. 1992;69:181-186.
11. Van de Putte G, Lie AK, Vach W, et al. Risk grouping in stage IB squamous cell cervical carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2005;99:106-112. (Pubitemid 41354590)
12. Hoffman MS, Cardosi RJ, Roberts WS, et al. Accuracy of pelvic examination in the assessment of patients with operable cervical cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190: 986-993. (Pubitemid 38561513)
13. Lee YK, Han SS, Kim JW, et al. Value of pelvic examination and imaging modality for the evaluation of tumor size in cervical cancer. J Gynecol Oncol. 2008;19:108-112.
14. Subak LL, Hricak H, Powell CB, et al. Cervical carcinoma: computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative staging. Obstet Gynecol. 1995;86:43-50.
15. Wagenaar HC, Trimbos JB, Postema S, et al. Tumor diameter and volume assessed by magnetic resonance imaging in the prediction of outcome for invasive cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2001;82:474-482. (Pubitemid 32826447)
16. Sheu MH, Chang CY, Wang JH, et al. Preoperative staging of cervical carcinoma with MR imaging: a reappraisal of diagnostic accuracy and pitfalls. Eur Radiol. 2001;11:1828-1833.
17. Mitchell DG, Snyder B, Coakley F, et al. Early invasive cervical cancer: tumor delineation by magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and clinical examination, verified by pathologic results, in the ACRIN 6651/GOG 183 Intergroup Study. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:5687-5694. (Pubitemid 46631310)
18. Jung DC, Ju W, Choi HJ, et al. The validity of tumour diameter assessed by magnetic resonance imaging and gross specimen with regard to tumour volume in cervical cancer patients. Eur J Cancer. 2008;44:1524-1528.
19. Hricak H. Carcinoma of the female reproductive organs. Value of cross-sectional imaging. Cancer. 1991;67:1209-1218.
20. Reznek RH, Sahdev A. MR imaging in cervical cancer: seeing is believing. The 2004 Mackenzie Davidson memorial lecture. Br J Radiol. 2005;78:S73-S85.
21. Sevin BU, Lu Y, Bloch DA, et al. Surgically defined prognostic parameters in patients with early cervical carcinoma. A multivariate survival tree analysis. Cancer. 1996;78:1438-1446. (Pubitemid 26317864)
22. Lai CH, Hong JH, Hsueh S, et al. Preoperative prognostic variables and the impact of postoperative adjuvant therapy on the outcomes of stage IB or II cervical carcinoma patients with or without pelvic lymph node metastases: an analysis of 891 cases. Cancer. 1999;85:1537-1546. (Pubitemid 29152826)
23. Kristensen GB, Abeler VM, Risberg B, et al. Tumor size, depth of invasion, and grading of the invasive tumor front are the main prognostic factors in early squamous cell cervical carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 1999;74:245-251. (Pubitemid 29377220)
24. Togashi K, Nishimura K, Sagoh T, et al. Carcinoma of the cervix: staging with MR imaging. Radiology. 1989;171:245-251. (Pubitemid 19093078)
25. Hricak H, Lacey CG, Sandles LG, et al. Invasive cervical carcinoma: comparison of MR imaging and surgical findings. Radiology. 1988;166:623-631. (Pubitemid 18058914)
26. Sahdev A, Sohaib SA, Wenaden AE, et al. The performance of magnetic resonance imaging in early cervical carcinoma: a long-term experience. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2007;17:629-636. (Pubitemid 46743998)
27. Itoh K, Shiozawa T, Ohira S, et al. Correlation between MRI and histopathologic findings in stage I cervical carcinomas: influence of stromal desmoplastic reaction. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2006;16:610-614.