An approach to compare two ontological models for representing Quranic words

iiWAS2010 - 12th International Conference on Information Integration and Web-Based Applications and Services

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 674-678

  Al Khalifa, Hend S ^a   Al Yahya, Maha ^a   Bahanshal, Alia ^b   Al Odah, Iman ^b   Al Helwah, Nawal ^c  

^a KING SAUD UNIVERSITY   (Saudi Arabia)

^b KING ABDULAZIZ CITY FOR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Saudi Arabia)

^c PRINCESS NOURAH BINT ABDULRAHMAN UNIVERSITY   (Saudi Arabia)

Author keywords

Arabic language; Componential analysis; Holy Quran; Modeling; Ontology engineering

Indexed keywords

ARABIC LANGUAGES; COMPONENTIAL ANALYSIS; HOLY QURAN; MODELING; ONTOLOGY ENGINEERING;

INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; SEMANTICS; USER INTERFACES; WEB SERVICES;

ONTOLOGY;

EID: 79956045355     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1967486.1967593     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. F. R. Palmer. Semantics: A New Outline. Cambridge University Press. 1976.
2. A. Ǵomez-Ṕerez, M. Ferńandez-Ĺopez, and O. Corcho. Ontological Engineering. Springer, 2003.
3. Hirst, G. Ontology and the Lexicon. In Staab, S. and Studer, R. (eds) Handbook on Ontologies and Information Systems. pp. 209-230 .Springer, Heidelberg (2004).
4. Ullman, S. Semantics: An Introducton to the Science of Meaning. Blackwell, Oxford (1972).
5. Trier, J. Der detutche Wortschatz im Sinnbezirk des Verstandes. Heidelberg (1931).
6. Lyons, J. Semantics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1977).
7. Fodor, J. D. Semantics: Thoreis of Meaning in Generative Grammer. Harvester Press Limited, Sussesx (1977).
8. Katz, J. J. Semantic Theory. Harper and Row, New York (1972).
9. Lakoff, G. On Generative Semantics. In Steinberg, D. D. and Jakobovits, L. A. (eds) Semantics: An Interdiciplinary reader in philosophy, linguistics, and Psycology. pp 232-296. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1971).
10. Leech, G. Semantics. Penguin Books, Harmondsworth (1974).
11. Hollmann, W. B. Semantic Change. In Culpeper, J. Katamba, F., Kerswill, P., McEnery, T. (eds) The English Language. Palgrave, Basingstoke, To Appear (n.d).
12. Al-Helwah, Nawal. Time Vocabulary in the Holy Quran: A Semantic Analysis Approach. Princess Norah University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia (2006).
13. Al-Mubaid H, Nguyen HA. A cluster-based approach for semantic similarity in the biomedical domain. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2006;1:2713-7. (Pubitemid 46520468)
14. Kalfoglou, Y. (2001). Exploring Ontologies. In: Handbook of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering: vol. 1: Fundamentals, pp. 863-887, World Scientific Publishing. ISBN 981-02-4973-X.
15. Isaac, A., van derMeij, L., Schlobach, S., Wang, S.: An empirical study of instance-based ontology matching. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Semantic Web Conference, Busan, Korea (2007).
16. T. R. Gruber. A translation approach to portable ontologies. Knowledge Acquisition, 5(2):199-220, 1993.
17. M. Uschold, M. King, S. Moralee, and Y. Zorgio: The Enterprise Ontology, Knowledge Engineering Review, 11(2), 1996.
18. Gruninger M, Fox MS. Methodology for the design and evaluation of ontologies. In: Skuce D, editor. IJCAI96 Workshop on basic ontological issues in knowledge sharing; 1995; 1995. p. 61-10.
19. Schreiber, G., Weilinga, B. & Jansweijer, W. (1995), The Kactus View on the'o' World, in'IJCAI95's workshop on Basic Ontological Issues in Knowledge Sharing'.
20. De Nicola, A., Missikoff, M., Navigli, R. A software engineering approach to ontology building. Information Systems. 34, 258-275 (2009).
21. Alexander Maedhe, Steffen Staab. "Comparing Ontologies-Similarity Measures and a Comparison Study". Internal Report No. 408, Institute AIFB, University of Karlsruhe, Germany. March 2001.
22. Vilches-Blázquez, L. M., Ramos, J. A., López-Pellicer, F. J., Corcho, O., Nogueras-Iso, J. An approach to comparing different ontologies in the context of hydrographical information. Popovich et al., (eds.): IF&GIS'09. LNG&C Springer. Pages: 193-207, 2009 St. Petersburg, Russia.