An approach to comparing different ontologies in the context of hydrographical information

Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 193-207

  Vilches Blazquez, L M ^a   Ramos, J A ^a   Lopez Pellicer, F J ^a   Corcho, O ^a   Nogueras Iso, J ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

Comparison; Data harmonization and integration; Geographical information; Heterogeneity; Hydrographical ontologies; Top down and bottom up approach

Indexed keywords

DATA INTEGRATION; INFORMATION FUSION; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; INFORMATION USE; ONTOLOGY; SEMANTICS;

BOTTOM UP APPROACH; COMPARISON; DATA HARMONIZATION; GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION; HETEROGENEITY;

GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

EID: 84863215159     PISSN: 18632351     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-00304-2_13     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (36)

1. Arpirez JC, Corcho O, Fernandez-Lopez M, and Gomez-Perez A (2003) WebODE in a nutshell. AI Magazine
2. Arpirez JC, Gomez-Perez A, Lozano A, and Pinto HS (1998) (ONTO) 2Agent: An ontology-based WWW broker to select ontologies. In: Gomez-Perez A, Benjamins RV (eds) ECAI'98 Workshop on Applications of Ontologies and Problem-Solving Methods. Brighton, United Kingdom, pp 16-24
3. Chaudhri VK, Farquhar A, Fikes R, Karp PD, and Rice JP (1998) Open knowledge base connectivity 2.0.3. Technical Report KSL-98-06, Knowledge Systems Laboratory, Stanford, CA, http://www.ai.sri.com/okbc/okbc-2-0-3.pdf
4. De Diego R (2001) Metodo de mezcla de catalogos electronicos. Grade thesis, Facultad de Informatica, Universidad Politecnica de Madrid
5. Euzenat J (2004) An API for ontology alignment, In: Proceedings of the Third International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC)
6. Farquhar A, Fikes R, and Rice J (1997) The Ontolingua server: A tool for collaborative ontology construction. Int J Human Comput Studies 46(6):707-727
7. Ganter B and Wille R (1997) Formal concept analysis: Mathematical foundations. New York, Springer, Secaucus, NJ, USA; Translator-C. Franzke
8. Gessler DD, Joslyn CA, Verspoor KM, and Schmidt SE (2006) Deconstruc-tion, re-construction, and ontogenesis for large, monolithic, legacy ontologies in semantic web service applications. Technical Report 06-5859, Los Alamos
9. Gimenez-Lugo GA, Amandi A, Sichman JS, and Godoy D (2002) Enriching information agents' knowledge by ontology Comparison: A case study. In: Proceedings of 8th Ibero-American Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IBERAMIA'02), Seville, Spain
10. Gomez-Perez A, Fernandez-Lopez M, and Corcho O (2003) Ontological Engineering. London (United Kingdom), Springer
11. Gomez-Perez A, Juristo N, and Pazos J (1995) Evaluation and assessment of knowledge sharing technology. In: Mars NJ (ed) Towards Very Large Knowledge Bases. Knowledge Building and Knowledge Sharing, IOS Press, pp 289-296
12. Gomez-Perez A (2003) Ontology evaluation. In: Staab S and Studer R (eds) Handbook on Ontologies, Springer, pp 251-274
13. Gruber TR (1993) Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing. In: International Workshop on Formal Ontology in Conceptual Analysis and Knowledge Representation. Padova, Italy, Kluwer, Netherlands
14. Gruber TR (1995) Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing. Int J Human Comput Studies pp 43(5-6)
15. Gruber TR (1993) A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowledge Acquisition 5:199-220
16. Guarino N and Welty C (2000) A formal ontology of properties. In: Dieng R and Corby O (eds), Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management: Methods, Models and Tools. 12th Intnal. Conference, EKAW2000. Springer
17. Hyung Hwang S, Kim HG, and Yang HS (2005) A FCA-based ontology construction for the design of class hierarchy. In: ICCSA (3), pp 827-835
18. IEEE (1996). IEEE Standard for Developing Software Life Cycle Processes. IEEE Std 1074-1995. New York, IEEE Computer Society
19. Kim IC (2004) FCA-based ontology augmentation in a medical domain. In: PAKM
20. Lopez-Pellicer F, Vilches-Blazquez LM, Nogueras-Iso J, Corcho O, Bernabe MA, and Rodriguez AF (2007) Using a hybrid approach for the development of an ontology in the hydrographical domain. In: Proceedings of 2nd Workshop of COST Action C21 -Towntology Ontologies for urban development: conceptual models for practitioners
21. Maedche A and Staab S (2001) Comparing Ontologies- Similarity Measures and a Comparison Study, Institute AIFB, University of Karlsruhe, Internal Report
22. Mizoguchi R, Vanwelkenhuysen J, and Ikeda M (1995) Task ontology of reuse of problem solving knowledge. Towards Very Large Knowledge Bases: Knowledge Building & Knowledge Sharing, pp 46-59
23. Noy NF and Musen MA (2004) Using prompt ontology - comparison tools in the EON ontology alignment contest, In: Proceedings of the Third International Workshop Evaluation of Ontology-based Tools (EON)
24. Noy NF, Fergerson RW, and Musen MA (2000) The knowledge model of Protege-2000: Combining interoperability and flexibility. In: Dieng R, Corby O (eds) 12th International Conference in Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management (EKAW'00). Juan-Les-Pins, France. (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence LNAI 1937) Springer, Berlin, Germany, pp 17-32
25. Rodriguez Pascual AF and Garcia Asensio L (2005) A fully integrated information system to manage cartographic and geographic data at a 1:25,000 scale. XXII International Cartographic Conference (ICC2005), A Coruna, Spain
26. Studer R, Benjamins VR, and Fensel D (1998) Knowledge engineering: principles and methods. IEEE Trans on Data Knowledge Eng 25(1-2):161-197
27. Uschold M and Griininger M (1996) Ontologies: Principles, methods and applications. Knowledge Eng Rev 11(2):93-155
28. van Heijst G, Schreiber A, and Wielinga B (1997) Using explicit ontologies in KBS development. Int J of Human Comput Studies 46(2/3):183-292
29. Vilches-Blazquez LM, Bernabe-Poveda MA, Suarez-Figueroa MC, Gomez-Perez A, and Rodriguez-Pascual AF (2007) Towntology & hydrOntology: Relationship between urban and hydrographic features in the geographic information domain. In: Ontologies for Urban Development. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 61, pp 73-84
30. Wang JZ, Ali F, and Appaneravanda R (2005) A Web Service for Efficient Ontology Comparison. ICWS 2005, pp 843-844
31. Wang JZ and Ali F (2005) An Efficient Ontology Comparison Tool for Semantic Web Applications. In: Proceedings Web Intelligence 2005, pp 372-378
32. Weinstein P and Birmingham W (1999) Comparing concepts in differentiated ontologies. In: Proceedings of KAW-99
33. Zimmermann K (2004) Ontology Comparison D19 v0.1. SW-Portal Working Draft. Available in http://www.deri.at/research/projects/sw-portal/2004/d19/v0. 1/20040906/
34. Dean M and Schreiber G (2003) OWL Web Ontology Language Reference. W3C Working Draft. http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-ref/
35. McGuinness DL and van Harmelen F (2004) OWL Web Ontology Language Overview. W3C Recommendation. http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-features/
36. Fonseca FT, Egenhofer MJ, Davis CA, and Camara G (2002) Semantic granularity in ontology-driven geographic information systems. AMAI Annal Math Artif Intell 36 (1-2):121-151 semántica colaborativa con dispositivos móviles en el Camino de Santiago" metainformación para la gestión de información y servicios en infraestructuras de datos geoespaciales