-
1
-
-
77954549902
-
-
M. Liljenberg, T. Brinck, B. Herschend, T. Rein, G. Rockwell, and M. Svensson J. Org. Chem. 14 2010 4696 4705
-
(2010)
J. Org. Chem.
, vol.14
, pp. 4696-4705
-
-
Liljenberg, M.1
Brinck, T.2
Herschend, B.3
Rein, T.4
Rockwell, G.5
Svensson, M.6
-
2
-
-
3743065708
-
-
second ed. McGraw-Hill International Book Company
-
J. March Advanced Organic Chemistry second ed. 1984 McGraw-Hill International Book Company
-
(1984)
Advanced Organic Chemistry
-
-
March, J.1
-
19
-
-
27844600578
-
-
L.V. Politanskaya, L.A. Malysheva, I.V. Beregovaya, I.Y. Bagryanskaya, Y.V. Gatilov, E.V. Malykhin, and V.D. Shteingarts J. Fluorine Chem. 126 2005 1502 1509
-
(2005)
J. Fluorine Chem.
, vol.126
, pp. 1502-1509
-
-
Politanskaya, L.V.1
Malysheva, L.A.2
Beregovaya, I.V.3
Bagryanskaya, I.Y.4
Gatilov, Y.V.5
Malykhin, E.V.6
Shteingarts, V.D.7
-
20
-
-
79956060023
-
-
version 7.0; Schrödinger, LLC: New York
-
Jaguar, version 7.0; Schrödinger, LLC: New York, 2007.
-
(2007)
Jaguar
-
-
-
21
-
-
79956022617
-
-
1
-
1.
-
-
-
-
24
-
-
37049073397
-
-
Sodium methoxide in methanol at rt. D.R. Chambers, M.J. Seabury, D.L.H. Williams, and N. Hughes J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1988 255 257
-
(1988)
J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1
, pp. 255-257
-
-
Chambers, D.R.1
Seabury, M.J.2
Williams, D.L.H.3
Hughes, N.4
-
25
-
-
0000584363
-
-
3 in acetone/water at reflux J.F.W. Keana J. Org. Chem. 55 1990 3640 3647
-
(1990)
J. Org. Chem.
, vol.55
, pp. 3640-3647
-
-
Keana, J.F.W.1
-
26
-
-
79956031106
-
-
In order to measure the accuracy, we calculated the energy differences between the two experimentally determined major isomers and the corresponding differences for the proposed method. For each reaction, we then calculated the deviation between the experimental energy difference and the calculated energy difference, and so obtained the average absolute deviation
-
In order to measure the accuracy, we calculated the energy differences between the two experimentally determined major isomers and the corresponding differences for the proposed method. For each reaction, we then calculated the deviation between the experimental energy difference and the calculated energy difference, and so obtained the average absolute deviation.
-
-
-
-
27
-
-
79956039364
-
-
Provided that these reactions will proceed at all - this model has nothing to say about absolute reaction rates
-
Provided that these reactions will proceed at all - this model has nothing to say about absolute reaction rates.
-
-
-
-
28
-
-
79955983460
-
-
This could be an indication that for some reactions involving sulfur nucleophiles, TS modeling is required to achieve high accuracy. We will return to this question in forthcoming work
-
This could be an indication that for some reactions involving sulfur nucleophiles, TS modeling is required to achieve high accuracy. We will return to this question in forthcoming work.
-
-
-
-
32
-
-
37049067823
-
-
Sodium methoxide in methanol at -82 to -84 °C (entry 6). Sodium hydrosulfide (NaHS) in DMF and ethylene glycol at -5 to 2 °C (entry 7). Sodium methanethiolate in ethanol at -85 to -90 °C (entry 8)
-
Sodium methoxide in methanol at -82 to -84 °C (entry 6). Sodium hydrosulfide (NaHS) in DMF and ethylene glycol at -5 to 2 °C (entry 7). Sodium methanethiolate in ethanol at -85 to -90 °C (entry 8). Brooke, G. M.; Chambers, R. D.; Drury, C. J.; Bower, M. J. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1, 1993, 2201-2209.
-
(1993)
Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans.
, vol.1
, pp. 2201-2209
-
-
Brooke, G.M.1
Chambers, R.D.2
Drury, C.J.3
Bower, M.J.J.4
|