Indigenous voice, community, and epistemic violence: The ethnographer's 'interests' and what 'interests' the ethnographer

Voice in Qualitative Inquiry: Challenging Conventional, Interpretive, and Critical Conceptions in Qualitative Research

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 27-43

  Marker, Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79956032956     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203891889     Document Type: Chapter

References (36)

1. Archibald, J. (Winter 1999/2000). Review of Brushed by Cedar, Living by the River: Coast Salish Figures of power. B. C. Studies, 124, 110-111.
2. Basso, K. H. (1996). Wisdom sits in places: Landscape and language among the Western Apache. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
3. Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. New York: Chandler Publishing.
4. Berger, T. R. (1991).A long and terrible shadow:White values, native rights in the Americas. Vancouver: Douglas & Mc Intyre.
5. Boxberger, D. (1989). To fish in common: The ethnohistory of lummi Indian salmon fishing. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
6. Chrisman, N. J. (2002). Toward a mature anthropology. Anthropology News, 43(4), 4-5.
7. Clifford, J. (1988). The Predicament of culture: Twentieth-century ethnography, literature, and art. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8. Coltelli, L. (1990). Winged words: American Indian writers speak. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
9. Cronon, W. (1983). Changes in the land: Indians, colonists, and the ecology of New England. New York: Hill &Wang.
10. Cruikshank, J. (1998). The social life of stories: Narrative and knowledge in the Yukon Territory. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
11. Deloria, V. (1977). Indians of the Pacific Northwest: From the coming of the white man to the present day. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
12. Deloria, V. (1995). Red earth white lies: Native Americans and the myth of scientific fact. New York: Scribner.
13. Deloria, V. (1997). Conclusion: Anthros, Indians, and planetary reality. In T. Biolsi & L. Zimmerman (Eds., Indians and anthropologists: Vine Deloria and the critique of anthropology (pp. 209-221). Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
14. di Leonardo, M. (1998). Exotics at home: Anthropologies, others, American modernity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15. Dirks, N., Eley, G., & Ortner, S. (Eds.). (1994). Introduction to Culture/power/history: A reader in contemporary social theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
16. Esber, G. S. (1992). Shortcomings of the Indian self-determination policy. In State and reservation: Newperspectives on federal Indian policy (pp. 212-223). Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
17. Geertz, C. (1995). Review essay: Culture war. New York Review of Books, 42(November 30), 4-7.
18. Harmon, A. (1998). Indians in the making: Ethnic relations and Indian identities around Puget Sound. Berkeley: University of California Press.
19. King, C. (1997). Here come the anthros. In T. Biolsi & L. Zimmerman (Eds., Indians and anthropologists: Vine Deloria and the critique of anthropology (pp. 115-119). Tucson:University of Arizona Press.
20. Lomawaima, T. (2000). Tribal sovereigns: reframing research in American Indian education. Harvard Educational Review, 70(1), 1-21.
21. Marcus, G. E., & Fischer, M. M. J. (1986). Anthropology as cultural critique: An experimental moment in the human sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22. Marker, M. (2000). Lummi identity and white racism: When location is a real place. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 13(4), 401-414.
23. Marker, M. (2001). Economics and local self-determination: Describing the clash zone in First Nations education. Canadian Journal of Native Education, 24(1), 30-44.
24. Martin, C. (1978). The keepers of the game: Indian-animal relationships and the fur trade. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
25. Meyer, M., & Klein, K. L. (1998). Native American studies and the end of ethnohistory. In R. Thornton (Ed.), Studying Native America: Problems and prospects. Madison, WI:University of Wisconsin Press.
26. Nader, L. (1974). Up the anthropologist - perspectives gained from studying up. In D. Hymes (Ed., Reinventing anthropology (pp. 284-311). New York: Vintage Books.
27. Nelson, R. (1989). The island within. New York: Vintage Books.
28. Ortner, S. (1994). Theory in anthropology since the sixties. In N. Dirks, G. Eley,&S. Ortner (Eds., Introduction to Culture/power/history: A reader in contemporary social theory (pp. 372-411). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
29. Said, E. (1978). Orientalism. New York: Pantheon Books.
30. Sewid Smith, D. (1997). The continuing reshaping of our ritual world by academic adjuncts. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 28(4), 594-603.
31. Smith, L. T. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. London: Zed Books.
32. Stoll, D. (1999). Rigoberta Menchú and the story of all poor Guatemalans. Boulder, CO:Westview Press.
33. Swisher, K. (1998). Why Indian people should be the ones to write about Indian education. In D. Mihesuah (Ed., Natives and academics: Researching and writing about American Indians (pp. 190-199). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
34. Tierney, W. G. (2000). Beyond translation: Truth and Rigoberta Menchú. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 13(2), 103-114.
35. Wolf, E. R. (1999a). Envisioning power: Ideologies of dominance and crisis. Berkeley, CA:University of California Press.
36. Wolf, E. R. (1999b). Anthropology and the academy: Historical reflections. In L. G. Basch, L. W. Saunders, et al. (Eds.), Transforming academia: Challenges and opportunities for an engaged anthropology. Arlington, VA: American Anthropological Association.