Wet versus dry age-related macular degeneration in patients with central field loss: Different effects on maximum reading speed

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 52, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 2417-2424

  Calabrèse, Aurélie ^a   Bernard, Jean Baptiste ^a   Hoffart, Louis ^b   Faure, Géraldine ^b   Barouch, Fatiha ^b   Conrath, John ^b   Castet, Eric ^a  

^a AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITY   (France)

^b TIMONE HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; DISEASE COURSE; EYE FIXATION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PATIENT SELECTION; PERIMETRY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSEUDOPHAKIA; READING; RELIABILITY; RETINA FOVEA; RETINA MACULA AGE RELATED DEGENERATION; SCOTOMA; VISUAL ADAPTATION; VISUAL FIELD DEFECT; VISUOMOTOR COORDINATION;

ADAPTATION, OCULAR; GEOGRAPHIC ATROPHY; HUMANS; LASER COAGULATION; PHOTOCHEMOTHERAPY; READING; SCOTOMA; VISUAL FIELD TESTS; VISUAL FIELDS; WET MACULAR DEGENERATION;

EID: 79956014494     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: 15525783     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.09-5056     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Legge GE, Ross JA, Isenberg LM, LaMay JM. Psychophysics of reading: clinical predictors of low-vision reading speed. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1992;33(3):677-687.
2. Cheung SH, Legge GE. Functional and cortical adaptations to central vision loss. Vis Neurosci. 2005;22(2):187-201.
3. Legge, G.B. (2007). Psychophysics of Reading in Normal and Low Vision. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2007.
4. Neelam K, Nolan J, Chakravarthy U, Beatty S. Psychophysical function in age-related maculopathy. Surv Ophthalmol. 2009; 54(2):167-210.
5. Rubin GS, Feely M. The role of eye movements during reading in patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Neuroophthalmology. 2009;33(3):120-126.
6. Ergun E, Maar N, Radner W, Barbazetto I, Schmidt-Erfurth U, Stur M. Scotoma size and reading speed in patients with subfoveal occult choroidal neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology. 2003;110(1):65-69.
7. Sunness JS, Applegate CA, Haselwood D, Rubin GS. Fixation patterns and reading rates in eyes with central scotomas from advanced atrophic age-related macular degeneration and Stargardt disease. Ophthalmology. 1996;103(9):1458-1466.
8. Cummings RW, Whittaker SG, Watson GR, Budd JM. Scanning characters and reading with a central scotoma. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1985;62(12):833-843.
9. Crossland MD, Culham LE, Rubin GS. Predicting reading fluency in patients with macular disease. Optom Vis Sci. 2005b;82(1): 11-17.
10. Crossland MD, Culham LE, Rubin GS. Fixation stability and reading speed in patients with newly developed macular disease. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2004;24(4):327-333.
11. Schuchard RA. Preferred retinal loci and macular scotoma characteristics in patients with age-related macular degeneration. Can J Ophthalmol. 2005;40(3):303-312.
12. Crossland MD, Culham LE, Kabanarou SA, Rubin GS. Preferred retinal locus development in patients with macular disease. Ophthalmology. 2005;112(9):1579-1585.
13. Fletcher DC, Schuchard RA, Watson G. Relative locations of macular scotomas near the PRL: effect on low vision reading. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1999;36(4):356-364.
14. de Jong PTVM. Age-related macular degeneration. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(14):1474-1485.
15. Zarbin MA. Current concepts in the pathogenesis of age-related macular degeneration. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122(4):598-614.
16. Ferris FL 3rd, Fine SL, Hyman L. Age-related macular degeneration and blindness due to neovascular maculopathy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1984;102(11):1640-1642.
17. Calabrese A, Bernard JB, Hoffart L, et al. Small effect of interline spacing on maximal reading speed in low-vision patients with central field loss irrespective of scotoma size. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51(2):1247-1254.
18. Rohrschneider K, Bultmann S, Springer C. Use of fundus perimetry (microperimetry) to quantify macular sensitivity. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2008;27(5):536-548.
19. Rohrschneider K. Determination of the location of the fovea on the fundus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45(9):3257-3258.
20. Tarita-Nistor L, Gonzalez EG, Markowitz SN, Steinbach MJ. Fixation characteristics of patients with macular degeneration recorded with the mp-1 microperimeter. Retina. 2008;28(1):125-133.
21. Kabanarou SA, Rubin GS. Reading with central scotomas: is there a binocular gain? Optom Vis Sci. 2006;83(11):789-796.
22. Rubin GS, Munoz B, Bandeen-Roche K, West SK. Monocular versus binocular visual acuity as measures of vision impairment and predictors of visual disability. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000; 41(11):3327-3334.
23. Chylack LT Jr, Leske MC, McCarthy D, Khu P, Kashiwagi T, Sperduto R. Lens Opacities Classification System II (LOCS II). Arch Ophthalmol. 1989;107(7):991-997.
24. Legge GE, Ross JA, Luebker A, LaMay JM. Psychophysics of reading, VIII: The Minnesota Low-Vision Reading Test. Optom Vis Sci. 1989;66(12):843-853.
25. Baayen, R.H., Davidson DJ, Bates DM. Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. J Mem Lang. 2008; 59:390-412.
26. Bolker BM, Brooks ME, Clark CJ, et al. Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol Evol. 2009;24(3):127-135.
27. Cheng J, Edwards LJ, Maldonado-Molina MM, Komro KA, Muller KE. Real longitudinal data analysis for real people: building a good enough mixed model. Stat Med. 2010;29(4):504-520.
28. Cheung SH, Kallie CS, Legge GE, Cheong AM. Nonlinear mixedeffects modeling of MNREAD data. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49(2):828-835.
29. Cohen J, Cohen P, West SG, Aiken LS. Applied Multiple Regression/ Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2003.
30. Cudeck R, Harring JR. Analysis of nonlinear patterns of change with random coefficient models. Annu Rev Psychol. 2007;58:615-637.
31. Gelman A, Hill, J. Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/ Hierarchical Models. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2007.
32. Pinheiro JC, Bates DM. Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-Plus: Statistics and Computing. New York: Springer; 2000.
33. Fleckenstein M, Adrion C, Schmitz-Valckenberg S, et al. for the FAM Study Group. Concordance of disease progression in bilateral geographic atrophy due to AMD. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010; 51(2):637-642.
34. Reinhard J, Messias A, Dietz K, et al. Quantifying fixation in patients with Stargardt disease. Vision Res. 2007;47(15):2076-2085.
35. R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2008.
36. Akutsu H, Legge GE, Showalter M, Lindstrom RL, Zabel RW, Kirby VM. Contrast sensitivity and reading through multifocal intraocular lenses. Arch Ophthalmol. 1992;110(8):1076-1080.
37. Mutlu FM, Akay F, Bayer A. Effect of pseudophakia on standard perimetry parameters. Curr Eye Res. 2009;34(9):711-716.
38. Timberlake GT, Peli E, Essock EA, Augliere RA. Reading with a macular scotoma, II: retinal locus for scanning text. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1987;28(8):1268-1274.
39. Timberlake GT, Sharma MK, Grose SA, Maino JH. Retinal locus for scanning text. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2006;43(6):749-760.
40. Deruaz A, Goldschmidt M, Whatham AR, et al. A technique to train new oculomotor behavior in patients with central macular scotomas during reading related tasks using scanning laser ophthalmoscopy: immediate functional benefits and gains retention. BMC Ophthalmol. 2006;6:35.
41. Duret F, Issenhuth M, Safran AB. Combined use of several preferred retinal loci in patients with macular disorders when reading single words. Vision Res. 1999;39(4):873-879.
42. Safran AB, Duret F, Issenhuth M, Mermoud C. Full text reading with a central scotoma: pseudo regressions and pseudo line losses. Br J Ophthalmol. 1999;83(12):1341-1347.
43. Fine EM, Rubin GS. Reading with simulated scotomas: attending to the right is better than attending to the left. Vision Res. 1999; 39(5):1039-1048.
44. Nilsson UL, Frennesson C, Nilsson SE. Location and stability of a newly established eccentric retinal locus suitable for reading, achieved through training of patients with a dense central scotoma. Optom Vis Sci. 1998;75(12):873-878.
45. Nilsson UL, Frennesson C, Nilsson SE. Patients with AMD and a large absolute central scotoma can be trained successfully to use eccentric viewing, as demonstrated in a scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Vision Res. 2003;43(16):1777-1787.
46. Varsori M, Perez-Fornos A, Safran AB, Whatham AR. Development of a viewing strategy during adaptation to an artificial central scotoma. Vision Res. 2004;44(23):2691-2705.
47. Petre KL, Hazel CA, Fine EM, Rubin GS. Reading with eccentric fixation is faster in inferior visual field than in left visual field. Optom Vis Sci. 2000;77(1):34-39.
48. Bernard J, Moscoso del Prado Martin F, Montagnini A, Castet E. A model of optimal oculomotor strategies in reading for normal and damaged visual fields. In: Perrinet LU, Dauncé E, eds. Proceedings of the Second French Conference on Computational Neuroscience (Neurocomp08). Marseille, France: Societé Française des Neurosciences; 2008:97-102.
49. Sunness JS. The natural history of geographic atrophy, the advanced atrophic form of age-related macular degeneration. Mol Vis. 1999;5:25.
50. Sunness JS, Bressler NM, Tian Y, Alexander J, Applegate CA. Measuring geographic atrophy in advanced age-related macular degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999;40(8):1761-1769.
51. Sunness JS, Gonzalez-Baron J, Applegate CA, et al. Enlargement of atrophy and visual acuity loss in the geographic atrophy form of age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology. 1999;106(9): 1768-1779.
52. Rubin GS. Vision rehabilitation for patients with age-related macular degeneration. Eye, 2001;15 (Pt 3):430-435.