A corpus-based approach to online materials development for writing research articles

English for Specific Purposes

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 222-234

  Chang, Ching Fen ^a   Kuo, Chih Hua ^a  

^a NATIONAL CHIAO TUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Corpus based approach; EAP; Genre analysis; Online materials development; Research articles

Indexed keywords

EID: 79956004478     PISSN: 08894906     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.esp.2011.04.001     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Anthony L. Writing research article introductions in software engineering: How accurate is the standard model?. IEEE Transactions of Professional Communication 1999, 42:38-46.
2. Anthony, L. (2005). AntConc, Version 3.0.1. Retrived from [computer software]. http://www.antlab.sci.waseda.ac.jp/software.html.
3. Berkenkotter C., Huckin T.N. Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication: Cognition/culture/power 1995, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
4. Bhatia V.K. Analyzing genres: Language use of professional settings 1993, Longman, London.
5. Bhatia V.K. Professional discourse: Towards a multi-dimensional approach and shared practice. Research and practice in professional discourse 2002, 39-60. City University of Hong Kong Press, Hong Kong. C.C. Candlin (Ed.).
6. Bianchi F., Pazzaglia R. Student writing of research articles in a foreign language: Metacognition and corpora. Corpus linguistics 25 years on 2007, 259-287. Rodopi, Amsterdam. R. Fachinetti (Ed.).
7. Bloch J. The design of an online concordancing program for teaching about reporting verbs. Language Learning and Technology 2009, 13(1):59-78.
8. Bloor M. Lexical and grammatical choices in innovative language use in computer science. Linguistic choice across genres: Variation in spoken and written English 1998, 155-171. John Benjamins, Amsterdam. A. Sánchez-Macarro, R. Carter (Eds.).
9. Butler C.S. Qualifications in science: Modal meanings in scientific texts. The writing scholar: Studies in academic discourse 1990, 137-170. Sage, Newbury Park, CA. W. Nash (Ed.).
10. Chapelle C.A. English language learning and technology 2003, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
11. Charles M. Phraseological patterns in reporting clauses in citation: A corpus-based study of theses in two disciplines. English for Specific Purposes 2006, 25(4):310-331.
12. Charles M. Reconciling top-down and bottom-up approaches to graduate writing: Using a corpus to teach rhetorical functions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2007, 6(4):289-302.
13. Cowie A.P. Phraseology: Theory, analysis, and applications 1998, Clarendon Press, Oxford, England.
14. Dudley-Evans T. Genre analysis: An investigation of the introduction and discussion sections of M.Sc. dissertations. Talking about text 1986, English Language Research, Birmingham University, Birmingham, England. M. Couthard (Ed.).
15. Genre studies in English for academic purposes 1998, Servei de Publicacions-Universitat Jaume I, Castelló, Spain, Castelló, Spain. I. Fortanet, S. Posteguillo, J.C. Palmer, J.F. Coll (Eds.).
16. Flowerdew J. Problems in writing for scholarly publication in English: The case of Hong Kong. Journal of Second Language Writing 1999, 8:243-264.
17. Academic discourse 2002, Pearson Education, London. J. Flowerdew (Ed.).
18. Small corpus studies and ELT 2001, John Benjamins, Amsterdam. M. Ghadessy, A. Henry, R.L. Roseberry (Eds.).
19. Giannoni D.S. Worlds of gratitude: A contrastive study of acknowledgement texts in English and Italian research articles. Applied Linguistics 2002, 23(1):131-156.
20. Gledhill C. The discourse functions of collocation in research article introductions. English for Specific Purposes 2000, 19(2):115-135.
21. Han Z., Park E.S., Combs C. Textual enhancement of input: Issues and possibilities. Applied Linguistics 2008, 29(4):597-618.
22. Hopkins A., Dudley-Evans T. A genre-based investigation of the discussion sections in articles and dissertations. English for Specific Purposes 1988, 7(2):113-122.
23. Howarth P. Phraseology in English academic writing 1996, Max Niemeyer Verlag, Tubingen, Germany.
24. Hyland K. Hedging in scientific research articles 1998, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
25. Hyland K. Disciplinary discourse: Social interactions in academic writing 2000, Longman, London.
26. Hyland K. Teaching and researching writing 2002, Longman, New York, NY.
27. Johnson, C. (1985). The composing process of six ESL students. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation) Illinosis State University, Normal, Illinois.
28. Kuo C.-H. The use of personal pronouns: Role relationships in scientific journal articles. English for Specific Purposes 1999, 18(2):121-138.
29. Kuo C.-H. Designing an online writing system: Learning with support. RELC Journal 2008, 39(3):285-299.
30. Lee D., Swales J.M. A corpus-based course for NNS doctoral students: Moving from available specialized corpora to self-compiled corpora. English for Specific Purposes 2006, 25(1):56-75.
31. Lim J.M.H. Method sections of management research articles: A pedagogically motivated qualitative study. English for Specific Purposes 2006, 25(4):282-309.
32. Liou, H. -C., Chang, J. -S., Kuo, C. -H., Chen, H., & Chang, C. -F. (2005). Web-based academic English course design and materials development. In Proceedings of the fourteenth international symposium on English teaching (pp. 452-463). Taipei, Taiwan: Crane Publishing.
33. Martin-Betancourt, M. (1986). The composing processes of Puerto Rican college students of English as a second language. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Fordham University, New York, NY.
34. Nation P. Learning vocabulary in another language 2001, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.
35. Nwogu K.N. The medical research paper: Structure and functions. English for Specific Purposes 1997, 16(2):119-138.
36. Peng J. Organizational features in chemical engineering research articles. ELR Journal 1987, 1:79-116.
37. Posteguillo S. The schematic structure of computer science research articles. English for Specific Purposes 1999, 18(2):139-160.
38. Robinson P. Review article: Attention, memory and the "noticing" hypothesis. Language Learning 1995, 45:285-331.
39. Corpus linguistics: Readings in a widening discipline 2004, Continuum, London. G. Sampson, D. McCarthy (Eds.).
40. Samraj B. Introductions in research articles: Variations across disciplines. English for Specific Purposes 2002, 21(1):1-17.
41. Schmidt R.W. The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics 1990, 11(2):129-158.
42. Schmidt R.W. Deconstructing consciousness in search of useful definitions for applied linguistics. AILA Review 1994, 11:11-26.
43. Sharwood Smith M. Speaking to many minds: On the relevance of different types of language information for the L2 learner. Second Language Research 1991, 72:118-132.
44. Sharwood Smith M. Input enhancement in instructed SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 1993, 15:165-179.
45. Swales J.M. Aspects of article introductions 1981, The University of Aston, Language Studies Unit, Birmingham, England.
46. Swales J.M. Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings 1990, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.
47. Swales J.M. Integrated and fragmented worlds: EAP materials and corpus linguistics. Academic discourse 2002, 150-164. Pearson Education, Harlow, England. J. Flowerdew (Ed.).
48. Swales J.M. Research genres: Explorations and applications 2004, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.
49. Swales J.M., Feak C.B. Academic writing for graduate students 2004, The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI. 2nd ed.
50. Tarone E., Dwyer S., Gillette S., Icke V. On the use of the passive and active voice in astrophysics journal papers: With extensions to other languages and other fields. English for Specific Purposes 1998, 17(1):113-132.
51. Thompson D.K. Arguing for experimental 'facts' in science: A study of research article results sections in biochemistry. Written Communication 1993, 10(1):106-128.
52. Thompson G., Ye Y. Evaluation of the reporting verbs used in academic papers. Applied Linguistics 1991, 12:365-382.
53. Academic writing: Intercultural and textual issues 1996, John Benjamins, Amsterdam. E. Ventola, A. Mauranen (Eds.).