Scene perception in age-related macular degeneration

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 51, Issue 12, 2010, Pages 6868-6874

  Tran, Thi Ha Chau ^a,b   Rambaud, Camille ^b   Despretz, Pascal ^a   Boucart, Muriel ^a  

^a CNRS   (France)

^b HÔPITAL SAINT VINCENT DE PAUL   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUTOFLUORESCENCE IMAGING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FLUORESCENCE ANGIOGRAPHY; HUMAN; MALE; OPHTHALMOLOGY; PERCEPTION; PERIMETRY; PERIPHERAL VISION; PHOTOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE TIME; RETINA MACULA AGE RELATED DEGENERATION; SCOTOMA; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL FIELD DEFECT; VISUAL STIMULATION;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEMALE; FLUORESCEIN ANGIOGRAPHY; HUMANS; MACULAR DEGENERATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RETINA; SCOTOMA; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL FIELD TESTS; VISUAL FIELDS; VISUAL PERCEPTION; WET MACULAR DEGENERATION;

EID: 79955972027     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: 15525783     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.10-5517     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Klaver CC, Wolfs RC, Vingerling JR, et al. Age-specific prevalence and causes of blindness and visual impairment in an older population: the Rotterdam Study. Arch Ophthalmol. 1998;116(5): 653-658.
2. Cheung SH, Legge GE. Functional and cortical adaptations to central vision loss. Vis Neurosci. 2005(2); 22:187-201.
3. Grill-Spector K, Malach R. The human visual cortex. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2004;27:649-677.
4. Mangione CM, Lee PP, Gutierrez PR, et al. Development of the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001(7);119:1050-1058.
5. Cahill MT, Banks AD, Stinnett SS, Toth CA. Vision-related quality of life in patients with bilateral severe age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology. 2005(1);112:152-158.
6. Brody BL, Gamst AC, Williams RA, et al. Depression, visual acuity, comorbidity, and disability associated with age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology. 2001(10);108:1893-1900; discussion 900-901.
7. Legge GE, Rubin GS, Pelli DG, Schleske MM. Psychophysics of reading, II: low vision. Vision Res. 1985(2);25:253-265.
8. Legge GE, Rubin GS, Luebker A. Psychophysics of reading, V: the role of contrast in normal vision. Vision Res. 1987(7);27:1165-1177.
9. Legge GE, Ross JA, Luebker A, La May JM. Psychophysics of reading, VIII: the Minnesota Low-Vision Reading Test. Optom Vis Sci. 1989(12);66:843-853.
10. Tejeria L, Harper RA, Artes PH, Dickinson CM. Face recognition in age related macular degeneration: perceived disability, measured disability, and performance with a bioptic device. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002(9);86:1019-1026.
11. Peli E, Goldstein RB, Young GM, et al. Image enhancement for the visually impaired: simulations and experimental results. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1991(8);32:2337-2350.
12. Boucart M, Dinon JF, Despretz P, et al. Recognition of facial emotion in low vision: a flexible usage of facial features. Vis Neurosci. 2008(4);25:603-609.
13. Owsley C, Sloane ME. Contrast sensitivity, acuity, and the perception of 'real-world' targets. Br J Ophthalmol. 1987(10);71:791-796.
14. Levy I, Hasson U, Avidan G, et al. Center-periphery organization of human object areas. Nat Neurosci. 2001(5);4:533-539.
15. Balas B, Nakano L, Rosenholtz R. A summary-statistic representation in peripheral vision explains visual crowding. J Vis. 2009(12); 9:13.1-13.8.
16. Boucart M, Naili F, Despretz P, et al. Implicit and explicit object recognition at very large visual eccentricities: no improvement after loss of central vision. Vis Cogn. 2010(6);18:839-858.
17. Greene MR, Oliva A. The briefest of glances: the time course of natural scene understanding. Psychol Sci. 2009(4);20:464-472.
18. Greene MR, Oliva A. Recognition of natural scenes from global properties: seeing the forest without representing the trees. Cogn Psychol. 2009(2);58:137-176.
19. Oliva A. Gist of the scene. In: Itti L, Rees G, Tsotsos JK, eds. Encyclopedia of Neurobiology of Attention. San Diego, CA: Elsevier; 2005:251-256.
20. Larson AM, Loschky LC. The contributions of central versus peripheral vision to scene gist recognition. J Vis. 2009(10);9:6.1-6.16.
21. Rousselet GA, Joubert OR, Fabre-Thorpe M. How long to get to the gist of natural scenes? Vis Cogn. 2005(6);12:852-877.
22. Joubert OR, Rousselet GA, Fize D, Fabre-Thorpe M. Processing scene context: fast categorization and object interference. Vis Res. 2007(26);47:3286-3297.
23. Holz FG, Bindewald-Wittich A, Fleckenstein M, et al. Progression of geographic atrophy and impact of fundus autofluorescence patterns in age-related macular degeneration. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007(3);143:463-472.
24. Schmitz-Valckenberg S, Bultmann S, Dreyhaupt J, et al. Fundus autofluorescence and fundus perimetry in the junctional zone of geographic atrophy in patients with age-related macular degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004(12);45:4470-4476.
25. Tanner WP Jr, Swets JA. A decision-making theory of visual detection. Psychol Rev. 1954(6);61:401-409.
26. Markowitz SN, Muller C. Macular perimetry in low vision. Can J Ophthalmol. 2004(1);39:56-60.
27. Henderson JM, Hollingworth A. High-level scene perception. Annu Rev Psychol. 1999;50:243-271.
28. Oliva A, Torralba A. Modeling the shape of the scene: a holistic representation of the spatial envelope. Int J Comput Vis. 2001;42: 145-175.
29. Torralba A, Oliva A. Statistics of natural image categories. Netw Comput Neural Syst. 2003;(3)14:391-412.
30. Ergun E, Maar N, Radner W, et al. Scotoma size and reading speed in patients with subfoveal occult choroidal neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology. 2003;(1)110: 65-69.
31. Oliva A, Schyns P. Diagnostic colors mediate scene recognition. Cogn Psychol. 2000;41:176-210.
32. Mace MJ, Thorpe SJ, Fabre-Thorpe M. Rapid categorization of achromatic natural scenes: how robust at very low contrasts? Eur J Neurosci. 2005 (7);21:2007-2018.
33. Mace MJ, Joubert OR, Nespoulous JL, Fabre-Thorpe M. The timecourse of visual categorizations: you spot the animal faster than the bird. PLoS ONE. 2009;(6)4:e5927.