Macular perimetry in low vision

Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 39, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 56-60

  Markowitz, Samuel N ^a,b   Muller, Charlene ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b NONE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Eccentric fixation; Low vision; Perimetry

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; EQUIPMENT; EYE FIXATION; EYE TRACKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; OUTPATIENT DEPARTMENT; PERIMETER; PERIMETRY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RETINA MACULA LUTEA; SCANNING LASER OPHTHALMOSCOPY; SCOTOMA; STANDARD; VALIDATION PROCESS; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 1542374126     PISSN: 00084182     EISSN: 17153360     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0008-4182(04)80053-X     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Schuchard RA. Validity and interpretation of Amsler grid reports. Arch Ophthalmol 1993;111(6):776-80.
2. Bischoff P, Lang J, Huber A. Macular sparing as a perimetric artifact. Am J Ophthalmol 1995;119(1):72-80.
3. Bass SJ, Sherman J. Visual field testing in the low vision patient. In: Rosenthal BP, Cole RG, editors. Functional assessment of low vision. St Louis: Mosby; 1996. p. 89-104.
4. Midena E, Degli Angeli C, Blarzino MC, Valenti M, Segato T. Macular function impairment in eyes with early age-related macular degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1997;38(2):469-77.
5. Appel SD, Brilliant RL. The low vision examination. In: Brilliant RL, editor. Essentials of low vision practice. Boston: Butterworth/Heinemann; 1999. p. 42-5.
6. Goodlaw EJ. Assessing field defects of the low vision patient. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1981;58:486-91.
7. Swann PG, Lowie-Kitchen JE. Age-related maculopathy. II: The nature of the central visual field loss. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1991;11(1):59-70.
8. Atchison DA, Lovie-Kitchin JE, Swann PG. Investigation of central visual fields in patients with age-related macular changes. Optom Vis Sci 1990;67(3):179-83.
9. Ray JS, Maahs MA. Low vision special populations. II: The stoke patient. In: Brilliant RL, editor. Essentials of low vision practice. Boston: Butterworth/Heinemann; 1999. p. 338-9.
10. Alexander MF, Maguire MG, Lietman TM, Snyder JR, Elman MJ, Fine SL. Assessment of visual function in patients with age-related macular degeneration and low visual acuity. Arch Ophthalmol 1988;106(11):1543-7.
11. Sunness JC, Schuchard RA, Shen N, Rubin GS, Dagnelle G, Haselwood DM. Landmark-driven fundus perimetry using the scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1995;36(9):1863-74.
12. Fletcher DC, Schuchard RA. Preferred retinal loci relationship to macular scotomas in a low-vision population. Ophthalmology 1997;104(4):632-8.
13. Whittaker SG, Budd J, Cummings RW. Eccentric fixation with macular scotoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1988;29 (2):268-78.
14. Haley MJ. The modern static perimeter. In: Haley MJ, editor. The field analyzer primer. 2nd ed. San Leandro (CA): Allergan Humphrey; 1987. p. 6-11.
15. Heijl A. Humphrey Field Analyzer. In: Drance SM, Anderson DR. Automated perimetry in glaucoma. New York: Grune & Stratton; 1985. p. 129-40.
16. Heijl A, Krakau CET. An automatic static perimeter, design and pilot study. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1975; 53:293-310.
17. Newman SA. Insensitivity of the automated monitoring system of the Octopus 2000R to small eye movements [abstract]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1987:28(suppl):270.
18. Kelly JS. Fundoscopically controlled scotometry. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1983;81:592-629.
19. Rohrschneider K, Becker M, Kruse FE, Fendrich T, Volcker HE. Stability of fixation: results of fundus-controlled examination using the scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Ger J Ophthalmol 1995;4(4):197-202.
20. Von Noorden GK, Mackensen G. Phenomenology of eccentric fixation. Am J Ophthalmol 1962;53:642-61.