Bearing surfaces for motion control in total knee arthroplasty

Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Guide to Get Better Performance

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 295-302

  Walker, P S ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79955967071     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-27658-0_47     Document Type: Chapter

References (32)

1. Akagi M et al (2000) The bisurface total knee replacement: a unique design for flexion. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 82:1626-1633
2. Ateshian GA et al (1991) Quantitation of articular surface topography and cartilage thickness in knee joints using stereophotogrammetry. J Biomech 24:761-776
3. Ateshian GA (2003) Topography of knee femoral articular surface. (Personal communication)
4. Blankevoort L et al (1988) The envelope of passive knee joint motion. J Biomech 21:705-720
5. Buechel FF (2002) Long-term follow-up after mobile bearing total knee replacement. Clin Orthop 404:40-50
6. Callaghan CM et al (1995) Patient outcomes following unicompartmental or bicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. J Arthroplasty 10:141-50
7. Cohen ZA et al (2003) Templates of the cartilage layers of the patello-femoral joint and their use in the assessment of osteoarthritic cartilage damage. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 11:569-579 (Pubitemid 36926532)
8. Draganich L et al (1998) TRAC PS knee design and clinical outcome. Abstracts Book, Annual Symposium of the Int Soc for Technology in Arthroplasty. Marseille, pp 96-99
9. Ewald FC (1974) Joint prostheses. United States Patent, number 3798679, March
10. Ewald FC (1989) The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop 248:9-12 (Pubitemid 20204774)
11. Feikes JD et al (1998) The unique track of intact passive knee motion as a kinematic baseline. Trans Orthop Res Soc 23:170
12. Haider H, Walker PS (2005) Measurements of constraint of total knee replacement. J Biomech 38:341-348 (Pubitemid 39642956)
13. Hill PF et al (2000) Tibiofemoral movement. II: The loaded and unloaded knee studied by MRI. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 82:1196-1198
14. Insall JH, Clarke HD (2001) Historic development, classification, and characteristics of knee prostheses. In: Insall JH (ed) Surgery of the knee, 3rd edn. Chap 73, vol 2, pp 1516-1552
15. Iwaki H et al (2000) Tibiofemoral movement. I: The shapes and relative movements of the femur and tibia in the unloaded cadaver knee. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 82:1189-1195
16. Li G, Zayontz et al (2003) Kinematics of the knee at high flexion angles. J Orthop Res 22:90-95
17. Luger E et al (1997) Inherent differences in the laxity and stability between the intact knee and total knee replacements. Knee 4:7-14 (Pubitemid 27160682)
18. MacWilliams BA et al (1999) Hamstrings co-contraction reduces internal rotation, anterior translation, and anterior cruciate ligament load in weight-bearing flexion. J Orthop Res 17:817-822 (Pubitemid 30033281)
19. Murray DG et al (1982) The variable axis prosthesis: 2-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 63:687-694
20. Nakagawa S et al (2000) Tibiofemoral movement: full flexion in the living knee studied by MRI. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 82:1199-2000
21. Rovick JS et al (1991) Relation between knee motion and ligament length patterns. Clin Biomech 6:213-220
22. Sathasivam S et al (1997) A computer model with surface friction for the prediction of total knee kinematics. J Biomech 30:177-184 (Pubitemid 27029796)
23. Sathasivam S et al (1999) The conflicting requirements of laxity and conformity in total knee replacement. J Biomech 32:239-247 (Pubitemid 29125447)
24. Seedhom BB et al (1974) The Leeds knee. Proc Institution of Mechanical Engineers, London, Symposium on Total Knee Replacement. CP16:108-114
25. Thompson WO et al (1991) Tibial meniscus dynamics using three-dimensional reconstruction of the magnetic resonance images. Am J Sports Med 19:210-216
26. Walker PS et al (1974) Proc Institution of Mechanical Engineers, London, Symposium on Total Knee Replacement. CP16: 22-29
27. Walker PS (1991) Design of Kinemax total knee replacement bearing surfaces. Acta Orthop Belg 57:108-113
28. Walker PS et al (1999) The design of guide surfaces for fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing knee replacements. J Biomech 32:27-34 (Pubitemid 29052412)
29. Walker PS et al (2000) Controlling the Motion of total knee replacement using intercondylar guide surfaces. J Orthop Res 18:48-55
30. Walker PS (2001) A new concept in guided motion total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 16:157-163 (Pubitemid 33151064)
31. Walker PS et al (2003) Characterising the motion of total knee replacements in laboratory tests. Clin Orthop 410:54-68 (Pubitemid 36538549)
32. Weiss JM et al (2002) What functional activities are important to patients with knee replacements? Clin Orthop 404:172-188 (Pubitemid 35351069)