Limitations of Imageless Computer-Assisted Navigation for Total Hip Arthroplasty

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 596-605

  Lin, Fang ^a,b   Lim, Dohyung ^a,c   Wixson, Richard L ^a   Milos, Steven ^a   Hendrix, Ronald W ^a   Makhsous, Mohsen ^a,b  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b REHABILITATION INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^c Korea Institute of Industrial Technology   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Computer assisted navigation; Hip arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ACETABULUM; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; MALE; PALPATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RELIABILITY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

ACETABULUM; AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BONE MALALIGNMENT; FEMALE; FLUOROSCOPY; HIP DISLOCATION; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; INCIDENCE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING, INTRAOPERATIVE; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 79955961827     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: 15328406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2010.05.027     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Morrey B.F. Difficult complications after hip joint replacement. Dislocation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1997, 344:179.
2. Lewinnek G.E., Lewis J.L., Tarr R. Dislocations after total hip replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg 1978, 60A:217.
3. Barrack R. Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: implant design and orientation. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2003, 11:89.
4. McCollum D.E., Gray W.J. Dislocations after total hip arthroplasty: causes and prevention. Clin Orthop 1990, 261:159.
5. Jolles B., Zangger P., Leyvraz P. Factors predisposing to dislocation after primary arthroplasty: a multivariate analysis. J Arthroplasty 2002, 17:282.
6. Biedermann R., Tonin A., Krismer M., et al. Reducing the risk of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: the effect of orientation of the acetabular component. J Bone Joint Surg 2005, 87B:762.
7. Nishii T., Sugano N., Miki H., et al. Influence of component positions on dislocation: computed tomographic evaluations in a consecutive series of total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2004, 19:162.
8. Padgett D.E.M.D., Lipman J.M.S., Robie B.P., et al. Influence of total hip design on dislocation: a computer model and clinical analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006, 447:48. [Report].
9. Burroughs B.R., Hallstrom B., Golladay G.J., et al. Range of motion and stability in total hip arthroplasty with 28-, 32-, 38-, and 44-mm femoral head sizes: an in vitro study. J Arthroplasty 2005, 20:11.
10. Kennedy J., Rogers W., Soffe K., et al. Effect of acetabular component orientation on recurrent, dislocation, pelvic osteolysis, polyethylene wear, and component migration. J Arthroplasty 1998, 13:530.
11. Del Schutte H.J., Lipman A., Bannar S., et al. Effects of acetabular abduction on cup wear rates in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1998, 13:621.
12. D'Lima D., Urquhart A., Buehler K., et al. The effect of the orientation of the acetabular and femoral components on the range of motion of the hip at different head-neck ratios. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2000, 82A:315.
13. Pellicci P., Bostrom M., Poss R. Posterior approach to total hip replacement using enhanced posterior soft tissue repair. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1998, 355:224.
14. Kwon M.S., Kuskowski M., Mulhall K.J., et al. Does surgical approach affect total hip arthroplasty dislocation rates?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006, 447:34.
15. Daly P.J., Morrey B.F. Operative correction of an unstable total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 1992, 74A:1334.
16. Hedlundh U., Sanzen L., Fredin H. The prognosis and treatment of dislocated total hip arthroplasties with a 22 mm head. J Bone Joint Surg 1997, 79B:374.
17. Khan A., Brakenbury P., Reynolds I. Dislocation following total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg 1981, 63B:214.
18. Wolf A., DiGioia A.M., Mor A.B., et al. Cup alignment error model for total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005, 437:132.
19. Kalteis T., Beckmann J., Herold T., et al. Accuracy of an image-free cup navigation system-an anatomical study. Biomed Tech (Berl) 2004, 49:257.
20. Nogler M., Kessler O., Prassl A., et al. Reduced variability of acetabular cup positioning with use of an imageless navigation system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004, 426:159.
21. Richolt J.A., Effenberger H., Rittmeister M.E. How does soft tissue distribution affect anteversion accuracy of the palpation procedure in image-free acetabular cup navigation? An ultrasonographic assessment. Comput Aided Surg 2005, 10:87.
22. Ybinger T., Kumpan W., Hoffart H.E., et al. Accuracy of navigation-assisted acetabular component positioning studied by computed tomography measurements: methods and results. J Arthroplasty 2007, 22:812.
23. Parratte S., Kilian P., Pauly V., et al. The use of ultrasound in acquisition of the anterior pelvic plane in computer-assisted total hip replacement: a cadaver study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008, 90:258.
24. Tannast M., Murphy S.B., Langlotz F., et al. Estimation of pelvic tilt on anteroposterior X-rays-a comparison of six parameters. Skeletal Radiol 2006, 35:149.
25. Lembeck B., Mueller O., Reize P., et al. Pelvic tilt makes acetabular cup navigation inaccuate. Acta Orthopaedica 2005, 205:517.
26. Murray D.W. The definition and measurement of acetabular orientation. J Bone Joint Surg 1993, 75B:228.
27. Lin F., Lim D., Wixson R.L., et al. Validation of a computer navigation system and a CT method for determination of the orientation of implanted acetabular cup in total hip arthroplasty: A cadaver study. Clin Biomech 2008, 23:1004.
28. Lim D., Lin F., Hendrix R., et al. Prediction of potential acetabular component misalignment due to inaccurate pelvic plane determination in navigated total hip arthroplasty (THA) 2006.
29. Spencer J.M., Day R.E., Sloan K.E., et al. Computer navigation of the acetabular component: a cadaver reliability study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006, 88B:972.
30. Kalteis T., Handel M., Bäthis H., et al. Imageless navigation for inserton of the acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty: is it as accurate as CT-based navigation?. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2006, 88B:163.
31. Parratte S., Argenson J.N. Validation and usefulness of a computer-assisted cup-positioning system in total hip arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized, controlled study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007, 89:494.
32. Dorr L.D., Malik A., Wan Z., et al. Precision and bias of imageless computer navigation and surgeon estimates for acetabular component position. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007, 465:9.
33. Archbold H.A., Mockford B., Molloy D., et al. The transverse acetabular ligament: an aid to orientation of the acetabular component during primary total hip replacement: a preliminary study of 1000 cases investigating postoperative stability. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006, 88:883.
34. Pearce C.J., Sexton S.A., Davies D.C., et al. The transverse acetabular ligament may be used to align the acetabular cup in total hip arthroplasty. Hip Int 2008, 18:7.
35. Mihalko W.M., Kammerzell S., Saleh K.J. Acetabular orientation with different pelvic registration landmarks. Orthopedics 2009, 32(10 Suppl):11.
36. Hakki S., Dordelly L., Oliveira D. Comparative study of acetabular center axis vs anterior pelvic plane registration technique in navigated hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics 2008, 31(10 Suppl 1).
37. DiGioia A.I., Jaramaz B., Plakseychuk A., et al. Comparison of a mechanical acetabular alignment guide with computer placement of the socket. J Arthroplasty 2002, 38:359.
38. Grutzner P., Zheng G., Langlotz U., et al. C-arm based navigation in total hip arthroplasty-background and clinical experience. Injury 2004, 35:S-A90-5.
39. Nishihara S., Sugano N., Nishii T., et al. Measurements of pelvic flexion angle using three-dimensional computed tomography. Clin Orthop 2003, 411:140.
40. Laffargue P., Pinoit Y., Tabutin J., et al. Computer-assisted positioning of the acetabular cup for total hip arthroplasty based on joint kinematics without prior imaging: preliminary results with computed tomographic assessment. Rev Chir Orthop Repar Appar Mot 2006, 92:316.
41. Widmer K.H. A simplified method to determin acetabular cup anteversion from plain radiographs. J Arthroplasty 2004, 19:387.
42. Dorr L.D., Maheshwari A.V., Long W.T., et al. Early pain relief and function after posterior minimally invasive and conventional total hip arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized, blinded study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007, 89:1153.
43. Widmer K.H., Majewski M. The impact of the CCD-angle on range of motion and cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Biomech 2005, 20:723.
44. Seki M., Yuasa N., Ohkuni K. Analysis of optimal range of socket orientations in total hip arthroplasty with use of computer-aided design simulation. J Orthop Res 1998, 16:513.
45. Widmer K.H., Zurfluh B. Compliant positioning of total hip components for optimal range of motion. J Orthop Res 2004, 22:815.
46. Harris W. Traumatic arthritis of hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1969, 51:737.
47. Bellamy N., Buchanan W., Goldsmith C.H., et al. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 1988, 15:1833.