Contraception use and effectiveness among women in a trial of the diaphragm for HIV prevention

Contraception

Volumn 83, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 556-563

  Blanchard, Kelly ^a   Bostrom, Alan ^b   Montgomery, Elizabeth ^c,d,h   Van Der Straten, Ariane ^c,h   Lince, Naomi ^a   De Bruyn, Guy ^e   Grossman, Dan ^a   Chipato, Tsungai ^f   Ramjee, Gita ^g   Padian, Nancy ^c,h  

^a IBIS REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d LONDON SCHOOL OF HYGIENE AND TROPICAL MEDICINE   (United Kingdom)

^e UNIVERSITY OF THE WITWATERSRAND   (South Africa)

^f UNIVERSITY OF ZIMBABWE   (Zimbabwe)

^g SOUTH AFRICAN MEDICAL RESEARCH COUNCIL   (South Africa)

^h RTI INTERNATIONAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Contraception; diaphragm; HIV prevention; South Africa; Zimbabwe

Indexed keywords

CONTRACEPTIVE AGENT;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONDOM; CONTRACEPTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; DIAPHRAGM; DRUG EFFICACY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS INFECTION; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY RATE; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SOUTH AFRICA;

ADULT; CONDOMS; CONTRACEPTION BEHAVIOR; CONTRACEPTIVE AGENTS; CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES, FEMALE; FEMALE; HIV INFECTIONS; HUMANS; MALE; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY RATE; SOUTH AFRICA; VAGINAL CREAMS, FOAMS, AND JELLIES; ZIMBABWE;

EID: 79955942241     PISSN: 00107824     EISSN: 18790518     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2010.10.018     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Hatcher RA, Trussell J, Stewart F, et al, editors. Contraceptive technology. 18th revised ed. New York: Ardent Media, Inc; 2004.
2. Yu J, Li J, Li HG, Li JX, Xie CS, Zhu CH. Comparative study on contraceptive efficacy and clinical performance of the copper/lowdensity polyethylene nanocomposite IUD and the copper T220C IUD. Contraception 2008;78:319-23.
3. Gallo MF, Nanda K, Grimes DA, Lopez LM, Schulz KF. 20 microg versus >20 microg estrogen combined oral contraceptives for contraception. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008;4:CD003989 Review.
4. Lopez LM, Grimes DA, Gallo MF, Schulz KF. Skin patch and vaginal ring versus combined oral contraceptives for contraception. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010:CD003552 Review.
5. Allen RE. Diaphragm fitting. Am Fam Physician 2004;69:97-100.
6. Warner L, Hatcher RA, Steiner MJ. Male condoms. In: Hatcher RA, Trussell J, Stewart F, et al, editors. Contraceptive technology. 18th revised ed. New York: Ardent Media, Inc; 2004. p. 334.
7. Moench TR, Chipato T, Padian NS. Preventing disease by protecting the cervix: the unexplored promise of internal vaginal barrier devices. AIDS 2001;15:1595-602. (Pubitemid 32918113)
8. Harvey SM, Bird ST, Branch MR. A new look at an old method: the diaphragm. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2003;35:270-3. (Pubitemid 38063087)
9. PATH. Re-examining the role of cervical barrier devices. Outlook 2003;20(2) Available at: http://www.path.org/files/eol20-2.pdf. Accessed September 2, 2009.
10. World Health Organization. Medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use, 3rd ed. Available at: http://www.who.int/reproductive-health/publications/ mec/mec.pdf. Accessed June 16, 2009.
11. Padian NS, van der Straten A, Ramjee G, et al. Diaphragm and lubricant gel for prevention of HIV acquisition in southern African women: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2007;370:251-61. (Pubitemid 47069513)
12. Trussell J. Contraceptive efficacy. In: Hatcher RA, Trussell J, Stewart F, et al, editors. Contraceptive technology. 18th revised ed. New York: Ardent Media, Inc; 2004. p. 792.
13. Steiner MJ, Kwok C, Dominik R, et al. Pregnancy risk among oral contraceptive pill, injectable contraceptive, and condom users in Uganda, Zimbabwe, and Thailand. Obstet Gynecol 2007;110:1003-9. (Pubitemid 350059403)
14. WHO/CONRAD Technical consultation on Nonoxynol-9: summary report. WHO, Geneva, 9-10 October 2001. World Health Organization, 2003.
15. Cook L, Nanda K, Grimes D. Diaphragm versus diaphragm with spermicides for contraception. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003: CD002031 Review.
16. Smith C, Farr G, Feldblum PJ, Spence A. Effectiveness of the nonspermicidal fit-free diaphragm. Contraception 1995;51:289-91.
17. Bounds W, Guillebaud J, Dominik R, Dalberth BT. The diaphragm with and without spermicide. A randomized, comparative efficacy trial. J Reprod Med 1995;40:764-74.
18. Barnhart KT, Rosenberg MJ, MacKay HT, et al. Contraceptive efficacy of a novel spermicidal microbicide used with a diaphragm: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2007;110:577-86. (Pubitemid 47359581)
19. The Cervical Barrier Advancement Society (CBAS). http://cervicalbarriers. org. Accessed September 2, 2009.
20. PATH. A new kind of diaphragm. Available at: http://www.path.org/ projects/silcs.php. Accessed December 6, 2010.
21. Raymond EG, Taylor D, Cates Jr W, et al. Pregnancy in effectiveness trials of HIV prevention agents. Sex Transm Dis 2007;34:1035-9. (Pubitemid 350158859)
22. Feldblum PJ, Adeiga A, Bakare R, et al. SAVVY vaginal gel (C31G) for prevention of HIV infection: a randomized controlled trial in Nigeria. PLoS One 2008;3:e1474.
23. Schreiber CA, Sammel M, Hillier SL, Barnhart KT. A little bit pregnant: modeling how the accurate detection of pregnancy can improve HIV prevention trials. Am J Epidemiol 2009;169:515-21.
24. Kibuuka H, Guwatudde D, Kimutai R, et al. Contraceptive use in women enrolled into preventive HIV vaccine trials: experience from a Phase I/II trial in East Africa. PLoS One 2009;4:e5164.