Pancreatic duct guidewire placement for biliary cannulation in a single-session therapeutic ERCP

World Journal of Gastroenterology

Volumn 17, Issue 15, 2011, Pages 1989-1995

  Xinopoulos, Dimitrios ^a   Bassioukas, Stefanos P ^a   Kypreos, Dimitrios ^a   Korkolis, Dimitrios ^a   Scorilas, Andreas ^b   Mavridis, Konstantinos ^a   Dimitroulopoulos, Dimitrios ^a   Paraskevas, Emmanouil ^a  

^a SAINT SAVVAS HOSPITAL   (Greece)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

Author keywords

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatog raphy; Pancreatic duct; Post endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatog raphy pancreatitis; Pre cut papillotomy

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CANNULATION; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; FEMALE; GENDER; GUIDE WIRE; HEPATOBILIARY SYSTEM; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PANCREAS DUCT; PANCREATITIS; PATIENT SAFETY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SATISFACTION; TECHNIQUE; VATER PAPILLOTOMY;

EID: 79955934722     PISSN: 10079327     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i15.1989     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Freeman ML, Guda NM. ERCP cannulation: a review of reported techniques. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 61: 112-125
2. NIH state-of-the-science statement on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for diagnosis and therapy. NIH Consens State Sci Statements 2002; 19: 1-26
3. Cortas GA, Mehta SN, Abraham NS, Barkun AN. Selective cannulation of the common bile duct: a prospective randomized trial comparing standard catheters with sphinc-terotomes. Gastrointest Endosc 1999; 50: 775-779
4. Lella F, Bagnolo F, Colombo E, Bonassi U. A simple way of avoiding post- ERCP pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 59: 830-834
5. Artifon EL, Sakai P, Cunha JE, Halwan B, Ishioka S, Kumar A. Guidewire cannulation reduces risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis and facilitates bile duct cannulation. Am J Gastroen-terol 2007; 102: 2147-2153
6. Lee TH, Park DH, Park JY, Kim EO, Lee YS, Park JH, Lee SH, Chung IK, Kim HS, Park SH, Kim SJ. Can wire-guided cannulation prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis? A prospective randomized trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: 444-449
7. Cheon YK, Cho KB, Watkins JL, McHenry L, Fogel EL, Sherman S, Lehman GA. Frequency and severity of post-ERCP pancreatitis correlated with extent of pancreatic ductal opacification. Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 65: 385-393
8. Vandervoort J, Carr-Locke DL. Needle-knife access papil-lotomy: an unfairly maligned technique? Endoscopy 1996; 28: 365-366
9. Rollhauser C, Johnson M, Al-Kawas FH. Needle-knife papillotomy: a helpful and safe adjunct to endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography in a selected population. Endoscopy 1998; 30: 691-696
10. Vandervoort J, Soetikno RM, Tham TC, Wong RC, Ferrari AP Jr, Montes H, Roston AD, Slivka A, Lichtenstein DR, Ruymann FW, Van Dam J, Hughes M, Carr-Locke DL. Risk factors for complications after performance of ERCP. Gas-trointest Endosc 2002; 56: 652-656
11. Foutch PG. A prospective assessment of results of needle-knife papillotomy and standard endoscopic sphincterotomy. Gastrointest Endosc 1995; 41: 25-32
12. Bruins Slot W, Schoeman MN, Disario JA, Wolters F, Tytgat GN, Huibregtse K. Needle-knife sphincterotomy as a pre-cut procedure: a retrospective evaluation of effcacy and complications. Endoscopy 1996; 28: 334-339
13. Rabenstein T, Ruppert T, Schneider HT, Hahn EG, Ell C. Benefts and risks of needle-knife papilotomy. Gastrointest Endosc 1997; 46: 207-211
14. Cotton PB. Pre-cut sphincterotomy: a risky technique for experts only. Gastrointest Endosc 1989; 35: 578-579
15. Gyökeres T, Duhl J, Varsányi M, Schwab R, Burai M, Pap A. Double guide wire placement for endoscopic pancreatobiliary procedures. Endoscopy 2003; 35: 95-96
16. Maeda S, Hayashi H, Hosokawa O, Dohden K, Hattori M, Morita M, Kidani E, Ibe N, Tatsumi S. Prospective randomised pilot trial of selective biliary cannulation using pancreatic guide-wire placement. Endoscopy 2003; 35: 721-724
17. Iqbal S, Sharma P, Shah S, Dhar V, Stavropoulos SN, Stevens PD. Role of Double Guide wire cannulation during ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 2008; 67 Suppl 5: S1528
18. Ito K, Fujita N, Noda Y, Kobayashi G, Horaguchi J, Takasawa O, Obana T. The usefulness and safety of pancreatic guidewire placement for achieving deep cannulation of the bile duct. Gastrointest Endosc 2008; 67 Suppl 5: S554
19. Cotton PB, Lehman G, Vennes J, Geenen JE, Russell RC, Meyers WC, Liguory C, Nickl N. Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc 1991; 37: 383-393
20. Schwacha H, Allgaier HP, Deipert P, Olschewski M, Allgaier U, Blum HE. A sphincterotome-based technique for selective transpapillary common bile duct cannulation. Gastrointest Endosc 2000; 52: 387-391
21. Dumonceau JM, Devière J, Cremer M. A new method of achieving deep cannulation of the common bile duct during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Endoscopy 1998; 30: S80
22. Herreros de Tejada A, Calleja JL, Díaz G, Pertejo V, Esoinel J, Gacho G, Jimenez J, Millan I, Gasrcia F, Abreu L. Doubleguidewire technique for difficult bile duct cannulation: a multicenter randomized, controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 70: 700-709
23. Freeman ML. Cannulation techniques for ERCP: one size does not fit all. Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 65: 132-133
24. Freeman ML. Adverse outcomes of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: avoidance and management. Gas-trointest Endosc Clin North Am 2003; 13: 775-798
25. Singh P, Das A, Isenberg G, Wong RC, Sivak MV, Agrawal D, Chak A. Does prophylactic pancreatic stent placement reduce the risk of post-ERCP acute pancreatitis? A meta-analysis of controlled trials. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 60: 544-550
26. Elta GH. Temporary prophylactic pancreatic stents: which patients need them? Gastrointest Endosc 2008; 67: 262-263
27. Goldberg E, Titus M, Haluszka O, Darwin P. Pancreaticduct stent placement facilitates difficult common bile duct cannulation. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 62: 592-596
28. Misra SP. Precut sphincterotomy: does the timing matter? Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: 480-483