Investigation of automatic prediction of software quality

Annual Conference of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society - NAFIPS

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages

  Osbeck, Joshua ^a   Virani, Shamsnaz ^b   Fuentes, Olac ^b   Roden, Patricia ^c  

^a WARTBURG COLLEGE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT EL PASO   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NORTH ALABAMA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATIC PREDICTION; CLASSIFIER MODELS; CODE QUALITY; ENSEMBLE LEARNING; MACHINE-LEARNING; NATURE OF SOFTWARE; QUALITY OF SOFTWARES; SOFTWARE CODES; SOFTWARE COMPANY; SOFTWARE MANAGERS; SOFTWARE QUALITY; SUBJECTIVE EVALUATIONS; UNDERSTANDABILITY;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE SELECTION AND EVALUATION; DATA PROCESSING; DECISION TREES; FORECASTING; REUSABILITY;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE REUSABILITY;

EID: 79955886450     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/NAFIPS.2011.5751946     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Research Triangle Institute, "The economic impacts of inadequate infrastructure for software testing", National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, 2002.
2. R. N. Charette, "Why software fails-the reasons that software projects go awry are well known. Yet failures, near failures, and just plain old bad software will continue to plague us", IEEE Spectr., vol. 42, no. 9, Sept. 2005.
3. Standish Group, "New Standish Group report shows more project failing and less successful projects", The Standish Group International, Inc., 2009.
4. M. C. Paulk, C. V. Weber, B. Curtis, and M. B. Chrissis. The Capability Maturity Model: Guidelines for Improving the Software Process. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Professional, 1995.
5. B. Amaba, "Business driven development", IIE Annu. Conf. and Expo., Orlando, FL, 2006.
6. S. S. Virani, S. Messimer, P. Roden, and L. Etzkorn, "Software quality management tool for engineering managers", Proc. of the 2008 Industrial Engineering Research Conf., Vancouver, Canada, 2008, pp. 1401-1406.
7. T. M. Mitchell, Machine Learning, 1st ed. New York: McGraw- Hill, 1997.
8. M. Hall, E. Frank, G. Holmes, B. Pfahringer, P. Reutemann, I. Witten, "The WEKA Data Mining Software: An Update", SIGKDD Explorations, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 10-18, 2009.
9. I. H. Witten, E. Frank, L. Trigg, M. Hall, G. Holmes, and S. J. Cunningham. "Weka: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques with Java Implementations", Proc. of ANNES'99 Int. Workshop on Emerging Engineering and Connectionnist-based Information System, Dunedin, New Zealand, 1999, pp. 192-196.
10. L. Breiman, "Random forests", Machine Learning, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 5-32, 2001.
11. I. Witten and E. Frank, Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques, 2nd ed. Boston, MA: Morgan Kaufmann, 2005.
12. D. H. Wolpert, "Stacked generalization", Neural Networks, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 241-259, 1992.
13. J. Bansiya and C.G. Davis, "A hierarchical model for object-oriented design quality assessment", IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng., vol. 28, no. 1, pp.4-17, 2002.
14. C. Chen, A. Liaw, and L. Breiman. "Using random forest to learn imbalanced data", University of California, Berkeley, 2004.
15. T. M. Khoshgoftaar, M. Golawala, and J. Van Hulse, "An empirical study of learning from imbalanced data using random forest", 19th IEEE Conf. on Tools with Artificial Intelligence, Patras, Greece, 2007, pp. 311-317.