Clinicopathological outcomes of clinical T1a renal cell carcinoma by tumor size

Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology

Volumn 41, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 637-641

  Kitagawa, Yasuhide ^a   Nakashima, Kazufumi ^a   Shima, Takashi ^a   Izumi, Kouji ^a   Narimoto, Kazutaka ^a   Miwa, Sotaro ^a   Miyagi, Tohru ^a   Maeda, Yuji ^a   Kadono, Yoshifumi ^a   Konaka, Hiroyuki ^a   Mizokami, Atsushi ^a   Namiki, Mikio ^a  

^a KANAZAWA UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Clinicopathological outcome; Renal cell carcinoma; T1a

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CANCER INVASION; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER RECURRENCE; CANCER RISK; CANCER SCREENING; CANCER SIZE; CANCER SURGERY; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL EVALUATION; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CORRELATIONAL STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; KIDNEY CARCINOMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; METASTASIS; MICROVASCULATURE; NEPHRECTOMY; NEPHRON SPARING SURGERY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROBABILITY; PROGNOSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;

AGED; CARCINOMA, RENAL CELL; DISEASE-FREE SURVIVAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; KAPLAN-MEIER ESTIMATE; KIDNEY NEOPLASMS; MALE; MICROCIRCULATION; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; NEOPLASM STAGING; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VASCULAR NEOPLASMS;

EID: 79955870393     PISSN: 03682811     EISSN: 14653621     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyr007     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Harmer M. TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours, 3rd edn. Geneva: International Union Against Cancer 1974.
2. Sobin LH, Fleming ID. TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors, 5th ed.: Union Internationale Contre le Cancer and the American Joint Committee on Cancer. Cancer 1997;80:1803-4.
3. Greene FL, Page DL, Fleming ID, Fritz AG, Balch CM, Haller DG, et al. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 6th edn. New York: Springer 2002.
4. Igarashi T, Tobe T, Nakatsu H, Suzuki N, Murakami S, Hamano M, et al. The impact of a 4 cm: cutoff point for stratification of T1N0M0 renal cell carcinoma after radical nephrectomy. J Urol 2001;165:1103-6.
5. Zini L, Patard J, Capitanio U, Crepel M, de la Taille L, Tostain J, et al. Cancer-specific and non-cancer-related mortality rates in European patients with T1a and T1b renal cell carcinoma. BJU Int 2008;103: 894-8.
6. Pahernik S, Ziegler S, Roos F, Melchior SW, Thüroff JW. Small renal tumors: correlation of clinical and pathological features with tumor size. J Urol 2007;178:414-7.
7. Thompson RH, Hill JR, Babayev Y, Cronin A, Kaag M, Kundu S, et al. Metastatic renal cell carcinoma risk according to tumor size. J Urol 2009;182:41-5.
8. Klatte T, Patard JJ, de Martino M, Bensalah K, Verhoest G, de la Taille A, et al. Tumor size does not predict risk of metastatic disease or prognosis of small renal cell carcinomas. J Urol 2008;179:1719-26.
9. Bedke J, Pritsch M, Buse S, Jakobi H, Elsaesser KH, Pahernik S, et al. Prognostic stratification of localized renal cell carcinoma by tumor size. J Urol 2008;180:62-7.
10. Kovacs G, Akhtar M, Beckwith BJ, Bugert P, Cooper CS, Delahunt B, et al. The Heidelberg classification of renal cell tumours. J Pathol 1997;183:131-3.
11. Chow WH, Devesa SS, Warren JL, Fraumeni JF. Rising incidence of renal cell cancer in the United States. JAMA 1999;281:1628.
12. Kume H, Suzuki M, Fujimura T, Fukuhara H, Enomoto Y, Nishimatsu H, et al. Distant metastasis of renal cell carcinoma with a diameter of 3 cm or less-which is aggressive cancer?. J Urol 2010;184:64-8.
13. Hsu RM, Chan DY, Siegelman SS. Small renal cell carcinomas: correlation of size with tumor stage, nuclear grade, and histologic subtype. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004;182:551-7.
14. Remzi M, Özsoy M, Klingler HC, Susani M, Waldert M, Seitz C, et al. Are small renal tumors harmless? Analysis of histopathological features according to tumors 4 cm or less in diameter. J Urol 2006;176: 896-9.
15. Dall'Oglio MF, Antunes AA, Sarkis Á S, Crippa A, Leite KR, Lucon AM, et al. Microvascular tumour invasion in renal cell carcinoma: the most important prognostic factor. BJU Int 2007;100:552-5.
16. Porpiglia F, Volpe A, Billia M, Scarpa RM. Laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy: analysis of the current literature. Eur Urol 2008;53:732-43.
17. Jeon HG, Jeong IG, Kwak C, Kim HH, Lee SE, Lee E. Reevaluation of renal cell carcinoma and perirenal fat invasion only. J Urol 2009;182:2137-43.
18. Siemer S, Lehmann J, Loch A, Becker F, Stein U, Schneider G, et al. Current TNM classification of renal cell carcinoma evaluated: revising stage T3a. J Urol 2005;173:33-7.
19. Yoo C, Song C, Hong JH, Kimk CS, Ahn H. Prognostic significance of perinephric fat infiltration and tumor size in renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 2008;180:486-91.
20. May M, Bookman-Amissah S, Kendel F, Knoll N, Roigas J, Hoschke B, et al. Validation of a postoperative prognostic model consisting of tumor microvascular invasion, size, and grade to predict disease-free and cancer-specific survival of patients with surgically resected renal cell carcinoma. Int J Urol 2009;16:616-21.