Degenerative processes in bioprosthetic mitral valves in juvenile pigs

Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2011, Pages

  Honge, Jesper L ^a   Funder, Jonas A ^a   Pedersen, Torben B ^a   Kronborg, Mads B ^a   Hasenkam, J Michael ^a  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Calcification; Mitral valveglutaraldehydeporcine model

Indexed keywords

GLUTARALDEHYDE;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOPROSTHESIS; CALCINOSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DISEASE MODEL; DRUG EFFECT; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; GRAFT REJECTION; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; METHODOLOGY; MITRAL VALVE; PATHOLOGY; SWINE; TISSUE PRESERVATION; TRANSPLANTATION; VALVULAR HEART DISEASE;

ANIMALS; BIOPROSTHESIS; CALCINOSIS; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; GLUTARAL; GRAFT REJECTION; HEART VALVE DISEASES; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; MITRAL VALVE; SWINE; TISSUE PRESERVATION;

EID: 79955860098     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17498090     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1749-8090-6-72     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Chatterjee K, de Leon ACJ, Faxon DP, Freed MD, et al. Focused update incorporated into the ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease): endorsed by the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Circulation 2008, 118:e523-e661.
2. Hammermeister K, Sethi GK, Henderson WG, Grover FL, Oprian C, Rahimtoola SH. Outcomes 15 years after valve replacement with a mechanical versus a bioprosthetic valve: final report of the Veterans Affairs randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000, 36:1152-1158. 10.1016/S0735-1097(00)00834-2, 11028464.
3. Gallegos RP, Nockel PJ, Rivard AL, Bianco RW. The current state of in-vivo pre-clinical animal models for heart valve evaluation. J Heart Valve Dis 2005, 14:423-432.
4. Hasenkam JM, Nygaard H, Terp K, Riis C, Paulsen PK. Hemodynamic evaluation of a new bileaflet valve prosthesis: an acute animal experimental study. J Heart Valve Dis 1996, 5:574-580.
5. Smerup M, Pedersen TF, Nyboe C, Funder JA, Christensen TD, Nielsen SL, et al. A long-term porcine model for evaluation of prosthetic heart valves. Heart Surg Forum 7:E259-E264.
6. Flameng W, Meuris B, De VG, Cunanan C, Lane E, Verbeken E, et al. Trilogy pericardial valve: hemodynamic performance and calcification in adolescent sheep. Ann Thorac Surg 2008, 85:587-592. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.09.041, 18222270.
7. Bodnar E. The Medtronic Parallel valve and the lessons learned. J Heart Valve Dis 1996, 5:572-573.
8. Simon P, Kasimir MT, Seebacher G, Weigel G, Ullrich R, Salzer-Muhar U, et al. Early failure of the tissue engineered porcine heart valve SYNERGRAFT in pediatric patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2003, 23:1002-1006. 10.1016/S1010-7940(03)00094-0, 12829079.
9. Swindle MM, Horneffer PJ, Gardner TJ, Gott VL, Hall TS, Stuart RS, et al. Anatomic and anesthetic considerations in experimental cardiopulmonary surgery in swine. Lab Anim Sci 1986, 36:357-361.
10. Goodman SL. Sheep, pig, and human platelet-material interactions with model cardiovascular biomaterials. J Biomed Mater Res 1999, 45:240-250. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19990605)45:3<240::AID-JBM12>3.0.CO;2-C, 10397982.
11. Pelagalli A, Belisario MA, Tafuri S, Lombardi P, d'Angelo D, Avallone L, et al. Adhesive properties of platelets from different animal species. J Comp Pathol 2003, 128:127-131. 10.1053/jcpa.2002.0615, 12634089.
12. McGowan JH, Cleland JG. Reliability of reporting left ventricular systolic function by echocardiography: a systematic review of 3 methods. Am Heart J 2003, 146:388-397. 10.1016/S0002-8703(03)00248-5, 12947354.
13. Hatle L, Brubakk A, Tromsdal A, Angelsen B. Noninvasive assessment of pressure drop in mitral stenosis by Doppler ultrasound. Br Heart J 1978, 40:131-140. 10.1136/hrt.40.2.131, 482788, 637964.
14. Rosenhek R, Binder T, Maurer G, Baumgartner H. Normal values for Doppler echocardiographic assessment of heart valve prostheses. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2003, 16:1116-1127. 10.1067/S0894-7317(03)00638-2, 14608282.
15. Gross DR. Thromboembolic phenomena and the use of the pig as an appropriate animal model for research on cardiovascular devices. Int J Artif Organs 1997, 20:195-203.
16. Gross DR, Dewanjee MK, Zhai P, Lanzo S, Wu SM. Successful prosthetic mitral valve implantation in pigs. ASAIO J 1997, 43:M382-M386. 10.1097/00002480-199709000-00003, 9360066.
17. Honge JL, Funder JA, Jensen H, Dohmen PM, Konertz WF, Hasenkam JM. Recellularization of decellularized mitral heart valves in juvenile pigs. J Heart Valve Dis 2010, 19:584-592.
18. Weber PA, Jouan J, Matsunaga A, Pettenazzo E, Joudinaud T, Thiene G, et al. Evidence of mitigated calcification of the Mosaic versus Hancock Standard valve xenograft in the mitral position of young sheep. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006, 132:1137-1143. 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.06.027, 17059935.
19. Flameng W, Meuris B, Yperman J, De VG, Herijgers P, Verbeken E. Factors influencing calcification of cardiac bioprostheses in adolescent sheep. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006, 132:89-98. 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.02.036, 16798307.
20. Duarte IG, MacDonald MJ, Cooper WA, Schmarkey SL, Gott JP, Brown WM, et al. In vivo hemodynamic, histologic, and antimineralization characteristics of the Mosaic bioprosthesis. Ann Thorac Surg 2001, 71:92-99. 10.1016/S0003-4975(00)01989-5, 11216817.
21. Ishihara T, Ferrans VJ, Jones M, Boyce SW, Roberts WC. Occurrence and significance of endothelial cells in implanted porcine bioprosthetic valves. Am J Cardiol 1981, 48:443-454. 10.1016/0002-9149(81)90071-0, 7270450.
22. Irwin E, Lang G, Clack R, St CJ, Runge W, Foker J, et al. Long-term evaluation of prosthetic mitral valves in sheep. J Invest Surg 1993, 6:133-141. 10.3109/08941939309141604, 8512887.
23. Crick SJ, Sheppard MN, Ho SY, Gebstein L, Anderson RH. Anatomy of the pig heart: comparisons with normal human cardiac structure. J Anat 1998, 193:105-119. 10.1046/j.1469-7580.1998.19310105.x, 1467827, 9758141.
24. Kunzelman KS, Cochran RP, Verrier ED, Eberhart RC. Anatomic basis for mitral valve modelling. J Heart Valve Dis 1994, 3:491-496.