Clinical value of combined single photon emission computerized tomography and conventional computer tomography (SPECT/CT) in sports medicine

Sports Medicine and Arthroscopy Review

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 174-181

  Hirschmann, Michael Tobias ^a,c   Davda, Kinner ^c   Rasch, Helmut ^b   Arnold, Markus P ^a   Friederich, Niklaus F ^a  

^a Kantonsspital Bruderholz ^*  (Switzerland)

^b Institute for Radiology and Nuclear Medicine   (Switzerland)

^c CHARING CROSS HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

ankle; foot; hip; knee; SPECT CT; spine; sports medicine

Indexed keywords

TECHNETIUM 99M;

ANKLE; BONE MARROW EDEMA; BONE METABOLISM; BONE PAIN; BONE SCINTISCANNING; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FEMOROACETABULAR IMPINGEMENT; FOOT; HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OSTEOARTHRITIS; OSTEOCHONDRITIS DISSECANS; PATELLA; PATELLOFEMORAL PAIN SYNDROME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SINGLE PHOTON EMISSION COMPUTER TOMOGRAPHY; SPORTS MEDICINE;

ANKLE INJURIES; CARPAL BONES; FEMALE; FOOT INJURIES; FRACTURES, CLOSED; HIP INJURIES; HUMANS; KNEE INJURIES; MALE; OSTEOCHONDRITIS DISSECANS; PATELLOFEMORAL PAIN SYNDROME; SPORTS MEDICINE; SYNOSTOSIS; TARSAL BONES; TOMOGRAPHY, EMISSION-COMPUTED, SINGLE-PHOTON; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 79955857510     PISSN: 10628592     EISSN: 15381951     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/JSA.0b013e3181ec8707     Document Type: Review

References (22)

1. Even-Sapir E, Keidar Z, Bar-Shalom R. Hybrid imaging (SPECT/CT and PET/CT)-improving the diagnostic accuracy of functional/metabolic and anatomic imaging. Semin Nucl Med. 2009;39:264-275.
2. Breunung N, Barwick T, Fernando R, et al. Additional benefit of SPECT-CT in investigating heel pain. Clin Nucl Med. 2008; 33:705-706.
3. Roarke MC, Nguyen BD, Pockaj BA. Applications of SPECT/CT in nuclear radiology. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;191: W135-W150.
4. Scharf S. SPECT/CT imaging in general orthopedic practice. Semin Nucl Med. 2009;39:293-307.
5. Knupp M, Pagenstert GI, Barg A, et al. SPECT-CT compared with conventional imaging modalities for the assessment of the varus and valgus malaligned hindfoot. J Orthop Res. 2009; 27:1461-1466.
6. Hirschmann MT, Iranpour F, Davda K, et al. Combined single-photon emission computerized tomography and conventional computerized tomography (SPECT/CT): clinical value for the knee surgeons? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010;18:341-345.
7. Hirschmann MT, Iranpour F, Konala P, et al. A novel standardized algorithm for evaluating patients with painful total knee arthroplasty using combined single photon emission tomography and conventional computerized tomography (SPECT/CT). Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010; 18:939-944.
8. Pagenstert GI, Barg A, Leumann AG, et al. SPECT-CT imaging in degenerative joint disease of the foot and ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91:1191-1196.
9. Bybel B, Brunken RC, DiFilippo FP, et al. SPECT/CT imaging: clinical utility of an emerging technology. Radiographics. 2008; 28:1097-1113.
10. Seo Y, Mari C, Hasegawa BH. Technological development and advances in single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography. Semin Nucl Med. 2008;38: 177-198. (Pubitemid 351466914)
11. Henckel J, Richards R, Lozhkin K, et al. Very low-dose computed tomography for planning and outcome measurement in knee replacement. The imperial knee protocol. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88:1513-1518. (Pubitemid 44782136)
12. Lee A, Emmett L, Van der Wall H, et al. SPECT/CT of femeroacetabular impingement. Clin Nucl Med. 2008;33: 757-762.
13. Mulholland NJ, Gnanasegaran G, Mohan HK, et al. Recognition of the femoroacetabular impingement syndrome on MDP SPECT CT. Clin Nucl Med. 2008;33:125-127.
14. Gnanasegaran G, Barwick T, Adamson K, et al. Multislice SPECT/CT in benign and malignant bone disease: when the ordinary turns into the extraordinary. Semin Nucl Med. 2009; 39:431-442.
15. Lorberboym M, Ami DB, Zin D, et al. Incremental diagnostic value of 99mTc methylene diphosphonate bone SPECT in patients with patellofemoral pain disorders. Nucl Med Commun. 2003;24:403-410.
16. Kijowski R, Blankenbaker D, Stanton P, et al. Correlation between radiographic findings of osteoarthritis and arthroscopic findings of articular cartilage degeneration within the patellofemoral joint. Skeletal Radiol. 2006;35:895-902. (Pubitemid 44697625)
17. Elias DA, White LM. Imaging of patellofemoral disorders. Clin Radiol. 2004;59:543-557. (Pubitemid 38950069)
18. Naslund JE, Odenbring S, Naslund UB, et al. Diffusely increased bone scintigraphic uptake in patellofemoral pain syndrome. Br J Sports Med. 2005;39:162-165. (Pubitemid 40314913)
19. Carson WG Jr, James SL, Larson RL, et al. Patellofemoral disorders: physical and radiographic evaluation. Part II: radiographic examination. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1984;185:178-186. (Pubitemid 14137576)
20. Kim HR, So Y, Moon SG, et al. Clinical value of (99m)Tcmethylene diphosphonate (MDP) bone single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2008;16:212-218. (Pubitemid 351218178)
21. Mohan HK, Gnanasegaran G, Vijayanathan S, et al. SPECT/CT in imaging foot and ankle pathology-the demise of other coregistration techniques. Semin Nucl Med. 2010;40:41-51.
22. Papathanassiou D, Bruna-Muraille C, Jouannaud C, et al. Single-photon emission computed tomography combined with computed tomography (SPECT/CT) in bone diseases. Joint Bone Spine. 2009;76:474-480.